We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
JRM vs Rupert “Basically my philosophy is Austrian School economics” – at 21:12 in this interview between Jacob Rees-Mogg and Rupert Lowe. How refreshing to see a media interview in which neither participant is an idiot.
What do we think? Is there hope for Britain?
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
Rupert Lowe’s main objective is ensuring Nigel Farage doesn’t crush Labour & the ‘Conservatives’.
That hope sure as hell isn’t represented by Lowe’s vanity project.
“That hope sure as hell isn’t represented by Lowe’s vanity project.”
JRM’s point was that his strategy is doomed. If it’s vanity, that would be an explanation for pursuing a doomed strategy.
The policies l, on the other hand, at least the economic ones, I wish could have a chance. I don’t see too many other people arguing for them.