Etiam pulvinar consectetur dolor sed malesuada. Ut convallis
euismod dolor nec pretium. Nunc ut tristique massa.
Nam sodales mi vitae dolor ullamcorper et vulputate enim accumsan.
Morbi orci magna, tincidunt vitae molestie nec, molestie at mi. Nulla nulla lorem,
suscipit in posuere in, interdum non magna.
Well, there are price controls on some things, most notably petrol. (Heaven knows why). I think the key to understanding probably comes in the words “The major supplier of CO2 in South Africa”. That is, there is either a de facto or de jure monopoly. Probably we blame past or present government industrial policy. (In truth though, I have no idea. I just saw these signs on refrigerators while I was there. Despite their presence, I never had any problem buying a Coke. (In fact, I have never been anywhere in the entire world where I had difficulty buying a Coke).
There are no price controls on CO2. Its just that Afrox who supplies Coke and SAB had 2 of its major suppliers undergo routine maintenance shutdowns at the same time. More like poor planning by Afrox and coke.
I just read today in the local newspaper that a plant in my community is going to be producting 250 tons of purified (food and manufacturing grade) liquid CO2 daily as a by-product of another plant’s ethanol production. Apparently the CO2 otherwise is just released.
Which makes me wonder, if that kind of CO2 is a by-product of ethanol production even before the ethanol is used (by burning), just how ‘green’ can ethanol possibly be? I suppose as long as it’s not fossil it’s a net gain. But it seems efficiency might be an issue.
You hit the nail on the head with the last sentence. A tremendous amount of energy is expended in converting sugary biomass to ethanol. The CO2 released for heating/boiling and then from fermentation is reclaimed in the next crop. (That is, if no fossil fuels are used for boiling.) So, from the perspective of emissions ethanol should be a net-C02 zero fuel.
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. Powered by WordPress & Atahualpa
Why the shortage?
Are there price controls on CO2 in South Africa, or something?
Well, there are price controls on some things, most notably petrol. (Heaven knows why). I think the key to understanding probably comes in the words “The major supplier of CO2 in South Africa”. That is, there is either a de facto or de jure monopoly. Probably we blame past or present government industrial policy. (In truth though, I have no idea. I just saw these signs on refrigerators while I was there. Despite their presence, I never had any problem buying a Coke. (In fact, I have never been anywhere in the entire world where I had difficulty buying a Coke).
There are no price controls on CO2. Its just that Afrox who supplies Coke and SAB had 2 of its major suppliers undergo routine maintenance shutdowns at the same time. More like poor planning by Afrox and coke.
I just read today in the local newspaper that a plant in my community is going to be producting 250 tons of purified (food and manufacturing grade) liquid CO2 daily as a by-product of another plant’s ethanol production. Apparently the CO2 otherwise is just released.
Which makes me wonder, if that kind of CO2 is a by-product of ethanol production even before the ethanol is used (by burning), just how ‘green’ can ethanol possibly be? I suppose as long as it’s not fossil it’s a net gain. But it seems efficiency might be an issue.
Midwesterner:
You hit the nail on the head with the last sentence. A tremendous amount of energy is expended in converting sugary biomass to ethanol. The CO2 released for heating/boiling and then from fermentation is reclaimed in the next crop. (That is, if no fossil fuels are used for boiling.) So, from the perspective of emissions ethanol should be a net-C02 zero fuel.