I was going to say that Guido’s headline cannot be improved upon, but, on second thoughts, the headline-writer really should have mentioned that the hamster was dressed as Godzilla. Details matter.
|
|||||
“Ofcom Fines 4chan £520,000, Lawyer Responds With Picture Of Giant Hamster”I was going to say that Guido’s headline cannot be improved upon, but, on second thoughts, the headline-writer really should have mentioned that the hamster was dressed as Godzilla. Details matter. 4 comments to “Ofcom Fines 4chan £520,000, Lawyer Responds With Picture Of Giant Hamster”Leave a Reply |
|||||
![]()
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
|||||
He could have simply referred OFCOM to Arkell vs Pressdram!
Yes indeed.
“Ofcom” and the rest of the regime, and it most certainly is a regime, can Go-To-Hell.
I see a lot of comments on tech sites, thinking they’re being helpful, to the effect that ”perhaps the solution is for 4chan to ban UK IP addresses”. No. Preston Byrne has it absolutely correct. 4chan is under no obligation to do a damned thing.
Excellent 🤣