We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
On-line philosophy bot The Ethical Philosophy Selector is an amusing attempt to see what a person’s philosophical influences are. Many blogs seem to be taking the test so I thought “what the heck”… My results leave me rather bemused given my dislike for Sartre.
1. Rand (100%)
2. Mill (90%)
3. Sartre (75%)
4. Epicureans (73%)
5. Kant (73%)
6. Nietzsche (70%)
7. Bentham (69%)
8. Prescriptivism (65%)
9. Aristotle (61%)
10. Stoics (60%)
11. Aquinas (59%)
12. Hume (56%)
13. Augustine (53%)
14. Plato (48%)
15. Spinoza (48%)
16. Cynics (47%)
17. Hobbes (47%)
18. Ockham (33%)
19. Noddings (23%)
Comments are closed.
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
