We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Alien vs. Predator… but which is which?

I am really looking forward to seeing the new Alien vs. Predator movie, the tagline of which is…

Whoever wins… we lose

But I also find it very appropriate to see those sentiments applied here as well regarding the other big fight epic due to be released a few weeks hence. No, I am really not looking forward to that one.

Ah blogs, is there anything they can’t do?

…as Homer Simpson might say when not contemplating donuts.

The always interesting Stacy Tabb has a rather groovy new project called Lab- Tested that does product reviews to determine the ‘dog friendliness’ of various things. Compelling reading for dawg lovers.

mister_starbuck2.gif

Lawyers in heartbreaking story…

It looks like hundreds of British lawyers will have to repay over £50 m taken from clients in what amounted to ‘referal fees’ (an ethical no-no). I cannot tell you how sad that makes me smiley_laugh.gif

Spyware is indeed criminal by its very nature

As US legislators act to make covertly installing spyware on computers illegal, I would be curious to know why Ron Paul thinks otherwise?

Surely installing unrequested spyware is no different than any other unauthorised intrusion onto private property? Is it any different from inviting a travelling salesman into your house only to later discover he covertly installed bugs and hidden cameras when you were not looking so that he could monitor your behaviour for his own benefit?

Government departments are named after whatever it is they seek to prevent

Such as the Department of Trade and Industry, or the Department of Education, for example. Yes, I know it is an old joke but… is it really a joke?

J.K. Rowling … the Anti-Disney?

I have always liked J.K. Rowling’s Harry Potter series (though I must confess I have only seen the movies and not read the books). She writes about wizards and magic and yet the world she creates is populated by characters who still act like real people.

Moreover she is the anti-thesis of the sugar coated Disney pabulum of recent years. Not only do her characters act like real people, when the story calls for it, they die.

l have long loathed Disney for presenting some of the classic children’s stories of Western literature in such a sanitised and castrated form that Disney’s use of the titles is close to being fraudulent (such as the completely inverted ‘Little Mermaid’). J.K. Rowling is made of far sterner stuff and she realises what the focus-group addled hacks at Disney do not… children are also made of sterner stuff.

Please read the damn job decription

A British muslim in the Royal Air Force has been successfully prosecuted for going AWOL after claiming he did not want to help kill fellow muslims in Iraq.

It seems to me that an excellent reason for refusing to join a nation’s military is the simple desire to not shoot at, or facilitate shooting at, people that you might not feel should not be shot at. If you have a goodly distrust for the wisdom of the state to begin with, taking the view that you are not going to kill someone just because the government wants you to is a very reasonable default position to adopt.

Now of course all states and their militaries are not the same. If you voluntarily contract to do the bidding of the government of Sweden or the Vatican or Switzerland or Costa Rica or Swaziland or Belize or Luxembourg… nations who are certainly not ‘military extroverts’… then the range of things you could reasonably expect to be asked to do will generally not include going to far off places you had never previously heard of and dropping bombs on the locals.

However…

If you do elect to join a military in circumstances other than fighting off the clear and present danger of an invasion, it seems to me that you are offering to allow the state make the decision for you of when it is appropriate to shoot and at which particular people. Moreover, if you join a military of some place like Britain, France or the USA, i.e. states who frequently sent their soldiers off to kill folks in far off lands for all manner of reasons other than the direct self-defence of the homeland, then it seems a bit rich to take the state’s pay checks for several years but then act surprised if you get asked to, well, help kill folks in far off lands.

Read the damn job description before you take the shilling.

Of Hippos and Birds

For those of you interested in business oriented blogging, I have written an article called Business Hippos and Blogging Birds over at the Big Blog Company. I have always seen business blogs as the best manifestation of the whole Cluetrain vibe.

Of Hippos and Birds

Remain Vigilant!

That essential source for civil liberties issues, vigilant.tv is showing signs of life again after a long absence from the blogosphere. That can only be a good thing.

Time to dump PayPal?

There has been a disturbing development in which PayPal seems to be threatening to withdrawn its services from blogs which violate their acceptable use policy. Fair enough on the face of it, as it is certainly PayPal’s right to offer to do business on whatever terms they wish.

But then take a look at what those terms are:

The Policy prohibits the use of PayPal in the sale of items or in support of organizations that promote hate, violence, or racial intolerance; items which graphically portray violence or victims of violence; or items closely associated with individuals notorious for committing murderous acts within the last 100 years.

So… write about or show pictures of the victims of a terrorist atrocity, or show pictures of Osama bin Laden and suddenly no more PayPal for you, as Bill Quick of Daily Pundit has found out.

They do not want to do business with Bill Quick? Well I am not so sure I want to continue to do business with PayPal then. Clearly Samizdata.net is going to have to review whether or not we will continue to have those PayPal buttons you see at the moment in our sidebar.

Is Science the ‘new Latin’?

Christy Davies has an interesting article on the Social Affairs Unit blog which looks critically at one of the educational ‘given’ of our age:

Science we are told is something that every child should and must study. Most children hate it, fail to master it and never use it or think about it again after they have left school. It is forced upon unwilling and inept pupils because it is supposed to be good for them. Science is the twenty-first century’s version of Latin.

Interesting stuff. Read the whole thing.

Christian Aid – as in Acquired Intelligence Deficiency?

The socialist charity and political lobbying group Christian Aid, has a new campaign called Vote for Trade Justice.

Free Trade: some people love it.

Imagine getting mugged after a tough day’s work.
Every. Single.Day.
By the same muggers.
Grind you down, wouldn’t it

That’s what it’s like for people struggling to make a living in the world’s poorest countries. Why?

So called Free Trade. Our government claims Free Trade is the solution to the world’s problems. But that’s exactly what you’d expect them to say. Why? Because it allows the world’s richest countries and their fat cat companies to profit.

Ok, so let me get this straight… Western farmers, their operations subsidised with other western taxpayer’s money and their own domestic markets distorted by ‘protective’ tariff barriers which increase the price of imports, sell to African countries and that is… Free trade? FREE TRADE?

What the hell is free about it?

Western agricultural producers are a nightmarish mix of tax subsidy and production quotas, with bizarrely priced surpluses that are occasionally and erratically dumped on Third World markets… and at the same time western consumers are denied access to both First and Third World products at their true economic cost by a vast raft of arcane state and super-state imposed regulations. Please explain who exactly is engaging in laissez faire here. The only intelligent bit is calling it “so called” free trade.

The problem is that vested economic interests (big business and big labour) have zero interest in free trade. They do not give a damn about the Third World, all they see is the extremely low labour costs in the developing countries and what that implies for their own narrow sectional interests… and they have the state to protect those interests with laws.

So is Christian ‘Aid’ screaming “Remove all tariffs to imports NOW”?

Of course not. They are calling for an end to “Free Trade”. What is needed is not democratically sanctified politically managed trade (which we have now) but real, genuine, non-government regulated free trade. The fact that Kenya actually does manage to sell significant quantities of very high quality green beans in Britain is a testament to how some people will succeed in spite of western regulatory systems which would rather their producers just lived in abject poverty and that westerners pay more for their food than they need to.

If Christian Aid really cared about people in the Third World rather than just posturing for their own self-important gratification, they would be demanding true laissez faire free trade in which low labour cost agricultural nations could take on the western open air industrial chemical factories, sorry I mean farms, without having the state/super-state controlling access to the target market tilt the scales against them.

Demand for more ‘organic’ produce increases by the year and many Third World countries are well suited to serve that premium high margin market. That is where the foolish self-appointed Paladins of the Oppressed should be directing their attention rather than calling for mere tinkering with the statist system of trade controls that is so integral to the problem in the first place.

With friends like Christian Aid, people in the developing world do not need enemies.

Socialism kills