I am not the only one who perceives a Caesarian theme to modern British politics. This portrait of political treachery chilled me to the marrow:
|
|||||
|
I am not the only one who perceives a Caesarian theme to modern British politics. This portrait of political treachery chilled me to the marrow: Misreporting Venezuela’s economy – Mark Weisbrot, writing for the Guardian in September 2010 Venezuela’s devaluation doom-mongers – Mark Weisbrot, writing for the Guardian in March 2013 Sorry, Venezuela haters: this economy is not the Greece of Latin America – Mark Weisbrot, writing for the Guardian in November 2013 For some reason Mr Weisbrot has not written much for the Guardian comment pages on the subject of Venezuela recently, but to its credit the Guardian has covered developments in that country in the news pages: ‘At least 35,000’ Venezuelans cross border to Colombia to buy food and medicine – a story from the Associated Press appearing in the Guardian on 17 July 2016.
Bloomberg reports:
The anti-Jacobite sentiment captured in an old verse of the National Anthem emphatically does not seem dominant today, despite Mr Murray’s moment of rebellion on the morning of the Scottish independence referendum. It is not a silly question to ask what effect Andy’s second Wimbledon Championship victory will have on how people in the various parts of the UK feel about Brexit and the possibility of Indyref2. Remain voter and quintessential Guardian writer of the old school Simon Jenkins now says,
In the run-up to the EU referendum there was a widespread conspiracy theory that
Pathetic delusions. The elite have much more sophisticated methods than that:
I suppose that one should not be surprised that people who saw nothing wrong with the EU’s favourite strategies of ignoring inconvenient popular votes or having referenda repeated until the (almost invariably less well-funded) opposition is worn down see nothing wrong with these views:
This leaflet, Why the Government believes that voting to remain in the European Union is the best decision for the UK, was sent by the Government to every household in the UK some weeks before the referendum. On page 14 it says,
An oft-repeated argument of those who seek to use a procedural trick to overturn the result is that the Leave campaign won as a result of ignorant tabloid-readers believing lies. If it turns out that the biggest lie of all was that the votes of the common folk would count equal to the votes of the quality, expect trouble. When surveyed about what aspects of their lives give them happiness most people cite such reasons as family and friends, a decently paid job, or interesting hobbies. Sorin Hershko may have some or all of those. I don’t know. But in addition to any other sources of satisfaction he also has this:
It is not over, but things are looking good for Leave. Update: Some internet sites where you can watch what is turning out to be a political earthquake: The Guardian‘s live blog. Hats off to them, this is the obvious first place to go. EU referendum rolling forecasts by Chris Hanretty, Reader in Politics University of East Anglia Political Betting.com. Sample headline “The results so far have developed not necessarily to Remain’s advantage”. A student of history, then. * First thoughts: – THE UNITED KINGDOM WILL LEAVE THE EUROPEAN UNION. – The working class did it. The issue was immigration. It wouldn’t have been my choice for main issue, but I am not ashamed to have been in a broad alliance. I’ll gladly bear the next election being won by a party I don’t like in exchange for elections mattering again. – Talking of which, who will win the next election? Which parties will fight it? When will it be? No idea. – Shy Leavers. And I hesitate to say this, but the atmosphere of blame following the murder of Jo Cox will have been perceived by many as moral blackmail. – The EU is holed beneath the waterline. People worldwide have seen that impossible things can happen. – President Trump? His visit to these shores is spookily well timed. – Prime Minister Cameron? – 2010-2016 – Don’t assume that the SNP actually wants another Scottish independence referendum. Right now a second indyref would have the same result as the first. The pro-Remain Daily Mirror has an odd choice for its front page: ![]() “THIS IS WHERE THE MONEY GOES” I know what the Mirror is trying to say, but what with “REMAIN” being in capitals and larger type, the instant impression that it gives to me is that REMAIN is a deep dark hole sucking the hapless voter inwards to destruction. A valiant effort by the Leave mole in the Mirror graphics department, but judging by the final polls, it may not be enough. But don’t let the polls cause you to give up and not bother voting: the pattern has been that phone polls tended towards Remain and online polls towards Leave. I attribute this to “Shy Leavers” being put off from disclosing their true intentions to a possibly disapproving human being, particularly since the murder of Jo Cox. I could, of course, be wrong in this supposition. But it is worth a go. My final Referendum thought? It’s one you could share with undecided left-wingers. A Leave win would increase the chance of Labour winning the next election, an outcome I do not want. But better a thousand times a party with the wrong policies in power for a few years in a system where we retain the power to throw them out next time than being sucked past the event horizon of the European Union, where all votes are votes for ever closer union. |
|||||
![]()
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
|||||