We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Frogs in the EU pot

Below is the story of the Irish referendum on the Nice Treaty. It is as clear a warning to those within the EU reach (grasp, claws etc) about the nature of its objectives and procedures as it gets. Yet it seems that the public, both in the EU and in the Eastern European countries so keen to join, do not register the rising levels of undemocratic behaviour. Just like in the tired old ‘boil a live frog’ myth1. But in this case, not only there is a frog in a pot with hot water, there is another one waiting to jump in as soon as the cooked one shrinks…

First, the Irish Government disregarded last year’s clear referendum result. The Telegraph reported in September:

Mr Ahern has virtually promised his EU counterparts that the Irish will say “Yes”, unlike last time, when they rejected the deal, thus threatening to unravel plans to enlarge the EU in 2004. This is European democracy, Henry Ford style – you can reach any answer, as long as it is yes. In simply refusing to recognise the outcome of the first referendum, the government makes the point of the No campaigners more eloquently than a thousand speeches.

Second, the governement changed the rules and amended the law on the conduct of plebiscites. Ireland used to have admirably fair rules on referendum campaigns, providing for equal airtime on state media and for the distribution to each household of a pamphlet setting out the case for each side. The government scrapped this rule. The way was thus clear for the Yes side to exploit its massive financial advantage. It outspent the anti-treaty campaign by a factor of 10 and played heavily on fears of what Ireland could lose by turning its back on Europe’s ambitions.

Third, the Irish government changed the question. Mr Ahern also rigged the question. Voters were asked to ratify Nice and, in the same vote, to oppose Irish participation in the EU army. Thus, many supporters of neutrality – a natural anti-Nice constituency – felt obliged to vote Yes. Daniel Hannan, a Conservative MEP for South East England explains what has been done to the question:

To see how outrageous this is, imagine that in a British referendum, Tony Blair phrased the question: “Do you want to join the single European currency and preserve the supremacy of the UK Parliament?”

Fourth, the Irish were facing moral blackmail. They were told that if they voted No, they would deprive 70 million people of the benefits they have themselves reaped from EU membership, even if the money has now virtually dried up. The rejection of Nice Treaty for a second time would, apparently, have delayed for at least three years the plans to bring the new members – Hungary, Poland, Latvia and the Czech Republic into the EU. Every big gun from Lech Walesa to St John Hume was wheeled out. Ireland, they all argued, has done well out of Brussels; now let’s give eastern Europe the same opportunity.2

Daniel Hannan again ‘fastidiously’ points out that given the Irish voted for enlargement…

…[it] is something of a surprise, then, to read the Nice Treaty and find that enlargement is barely mentioned: it comes in a codicil tacked on at the end, and could easily have been agreed without a referendum. Nice is about deepening rather than widening the EU.

It provides, among other things, for the scrapping of 39 national vetoes, the harmonisation of justice and home affairs and the establishment of pan-European political parties. The Euro-elites were never going to allow mere public opinion to stop all this. Once again, they have got their way.

…and concludes that:

In order to ratify an essentially undemocratic treaty, Ireland has had to debase its own democratic procedures.

Makes sense to me. In order to cook the frog, you need to increase the temperature…

1 = In the experiment a frog was dropped into a pot of hot (not boiling) water. It immediately jumped out, as would any sensible frog. Then it was placed in a pot of cool water sitting on a stove. This was more to its liking, so it swam about and lounged comfortably. The heat was turned on and raised very gradually. Soon it was hotter than the water in the first experiment, but the frog didn’t jump out. This was because there was no dramatic difference, as there had been when it was taken from room temperature and dropped into hot water. The frog became accustomed to the increased temperature as it was raised little by little. Before long the temperature was so high that the frog was unable to jump out of the pot, and it died.

2= Polish prime minister Leszek Miller, keeping a pledge he made to a local television station, drank a glass of Guinness and sang the popular folk song “I love you, Ireland” when told the Irish had definitely voted Yes.

The EU learning curve

SCENE: BRUSSELS. OFFICES OF THE EU COMMISSION. THE COMMISSIONERS ARE HUDDLED AROUND A SHEAF OF NEWSPAPER REPORTS FROM THE MIDDLE EAST.

LOUIS: Look at this…..100 per cent!!

HANS: It is truly amazing

DIRK: I wouldn’t believe it if I couldn’t see it with my own eyes

SVEN: Vote after vote, all the same; Saddam, Saddam, Saddam, Saddam, Saddam……

HANS: Yes, and how many did that cowboy Bush get, eh?

LOUIS: Precisely, Hans

DIRK: That lucky, lucky bastard

LOUIS: ‘Luck’ had nothing to do with it, Dirk

SVEN: You’re right, Louis. The Iraqi people obviously adore him

HANS: If only we could get an endorsement like this

DIRK: We, too, have our own loyal supporters

LOUIS: Yes, but they’re both getting old now

SVEN: I don’t understand. What does Hussein have that we don’t?

DIRK: Well, the Americans actually pay attention to him

LOUIS: That’s not the reason, Dirk. No, the man is obviously a campaigning genius

HANS: Clearly

SVEN: 100 per cent. 100 per cent. I just love saying those words…

LOUIS: Sven, get your hands out of your pockets, this instant

SVEN: (Sheepish) Sorry, sorry. I..er…just got a little carried away

DIRK: We must find out Saddam’s secret

HANS: Yes, that must be our top priority

LOUIS bangs his fist down on the table

LOUIS: I know exactly what we must do. We must support the American attack on Iraq!

SVEN: WHAT!!??

DIRK: Louis, are you mad?

HANS: You cannot be serious, Louis

SVEN: What about our principles?

DIRK: What about stability in the region?

HANS: What about my investments in Baghdad?

LOUIS: Listen to me, you fools. We support the American attack, they go in and do all the fighting and depose Saddam….Then we bring him to Brussels and employ him as our Public Relations Consultant.

SVEN: Louis, that’s…that’s brilliant!!

DIRK: Damn, why didn’t I think of that?

HANS: Louis, you are a Born Leader.

LOUIS: I know, Hans, I know. And, one day, all of Europe will agree with you.

What’s the punishment for treason nowadays?!

Thanks to Scrofula we know that the British MP, George Galloway is still out there, way out there.

Galloway spoke last Friday at the American University of Beirut, urging students to take to the streets in massive demonstrations if they wanted to avoid a century in which they will see their resources stolen and continued Israeli domination in the region. He talked about a Western plan aimed at carving the Arab world into smaller and even weaker states.

He claimed that British officials are deciding whether Saudi Arabia will be two or three countries and if Sudan will be two states or not. Their intention, according to Galloway, is to create a holy Saudi Arabia for the Muslims and keep the other Saudi Arabia that has oil fields for themselves.

Nothing’s missed, we have it all here – Israel, oil, British imperialism – Brendan O’Neill should leap for joy… I wonder whether Mr Galloway reads Spiked (former Living Marxism).

Galloway told the audience that people in Britain have done their bit by organising protests against a war on Iraq. But he said it is time for Arabs to demonstrate that they can threaten interests of the West in the region.

I led the biggest demonstration in the history of Britain two weeks ago, half a million people marched through the streets of London under the slogan ‘Justice for Palestine and no war in Iraq’

Apart from confusing two very different demonstrations and blatantly lying about importance and size of the anti-war one, what the hell is going on here?! How can a representative of the British public, a member of the nation’s legislature, incite violence (as in inviting ‘demonstration of a threat to insterests of the West in the region’) against his own country? This used to be called treason, fair and square, and George Galloway is guilty of it many times over. If democracy has any spine, why is he running around spewing such non-sense as an elected member of the Parliament? Do the people who voted for him agree with his treason? → Continue reading: What’s the punishment for treason nowadays?!

Be afraid. Be very afraid.

Iain Murray has scared the **** out of me.

If the Blogger bug strikes, as it might well (some bug has certainly prevented me from posting at all on my own blog today), go to The Edge of England’s Sword and scroll down until you reach the words “The end of Habeus Corpus in Britain.” The thing I’m talking about was posted on Tuesday October 15th at 9.19 am.

Don’t give me any of your excuses, either. Whatever the difficulty, go there.

What the f**k do you THINK it means?

In what can only be the yet another indication the the EU intends to ignore even the semblance of democratic norms when it does not suit them, whilst at the same time wrapping themselves in the cloak of legitimacy that the European ‘Parliament’ allegedly brings:

Günter Verheugen, enlargement Commissioner, said on Wednesday, that it would be difficult to interpret a second No by the Irish: “If a treaty is rejected twice in a country and that country knows exactly that this treaty is a precondition for the conclusions of enlargement negotiations, the outside world cannot make the judge whether the rejections means enlargement or something else.”

So if Ireland votes NO to EU enlargement, Günter Verheugen feels it might in fact mean something other than NO to enlargement. I suspect I understand the source of the misunderstanding: When translated by official EU translators from Irish accented English, into Greek and then into Danish and then back into English, the result was:

A pint of Guinness please

However when translated by official EU translators from Irish accented English, into German and then into Swedish and then back into English, the result was:

Top of the morning to you, Mrs. Murphy

Yet when translated by official EU translators from Irish accented English, into Portuguese and then into Italian and then back into English, the result was:

We are just a bunch of Paddy jokers, pay no attention to us

No wonder poor Günter Verheugen is confused as to the meaning of the word NO.

Perhaps FUCK OFF would be more clear?

Betting on a sure thing

Making dire predictions about the organisational abilities of the European Union is a fairly safe bet I reckon, but even I have been taken aback by the speed with which this prediction (from early April):

“So, cue another round of horse-trading, bickering and monumental waste as each part of the Galileo project is apportioned out according to who makes the most noise. The French will build the electrics, the Italians will build the housing, the Belgians will make the navigation system, the Germans will make the rocket boosters, the Spanish will make the launch platform, the Austrians will make the sandwiches and Sweden will provide the environmental protestors.”

has become this reality:

“Germany and Italy are fighting it out within the European Space Agency for the right to provide the main production base for the satellite system, to which EU governments gave the green light in March.

Their dispute has prevented the ESA from beginning work on the project and risks setting back its projected completion date of 2008.”

I submit that I am entitled to enjoy a brief frisson of self-congratulation.

[My thanks to Philip Chaston for the second link]

Europe ‘wants leadership from Britain’

Or so says leading New Labour talking head and failed Northern Ireland Secretary Peter Mandelson.

He says one of Europe’s “huge challenges” in the next couple of years includes “rebuilding the Atlantic alliance”. Well this is indeed a ‘European’ problem, but not a British problem. British relations with the United States and Canada are just fine, thanks… it is the governments of France and Germany which have problems with anti-Americanism at the highest levels.

At least I agree with the dismal Mandelson on one point: the need for ‘British Leadership’ in Europe. Let the nations of Europe follow Britain as it walks briskly for the door marked EXIT.

fuck_the_eu.jpg

EUroaches

Jim Bennett‘s latest Anglosphere article is a particularly good one called The European Roach Motel.

It addressed in more depth the same issues we touched on in The traitor class at work.

The traitor class at work

So moves are afoot to lock the UK into the EU, sponsored by a man who is by any reasonable definition a traitor, by the name of Andrew Duff.

Pass whatever laws you wish, Andrew dear…as long as Britain maintains its own armed forces, ultimately British society can elect to rid itself of its onerous ties to socialist Europe, at bayonet point if required regardless of your meaningless legalisms… at which point it might be best for all concerned if you decided it would be prudent for you to stay in Brussels rather than come back to what you clearly do not regard as home.

fuck_the_eu.jpg

C’mon…higher, higher!

A new poll suggests anti-euro sentiment hits new high. A survey carried out in early August, found 60 percent of respondents said they would vote against joining the euro, if the government held a referendum then on replacing the pound. Only 26 percent of the 2,000 respondents said they would vote in favour of joining the single European currency.

The only problem I have with this news is the old, but true, adage “lies, damn lies, and statistics”. And the sample of 2,000 respondents is far too small for rejoicing. At least it seems to be going the right direction.

fuck_the_eu.jpg

Greece: welcome to the third world

Adriana wishes she were dreaming and so do a number of British Plane Spotters. Let’s face it. The Greek government are a bunch of whackos and their very presence in the EU should be more than enough to convince any sane person to get far clear of it.

I expect the economic consequence to them to be absolutely disastrous. Would you recommend Greece for a holiday if you have to leave your palm pilot, your laptop, your phone and god knows what else behind? Would you even consent to a business meeting in that backward country? Not I, for damn sure.

European Copyright Directive

Want to see just how ghastly the European Copyright Directive is? Well look at this Stand article and then tell me why the EU is a good thing.

fuck_the_eu.jpg