|
|||||
|
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
EconomicsSamizdatistas |
Samizdata tweet of the yearJanuary 31st, 2017 |
 8 comments to Samizdata tweet of the year |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons   |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
|||||
Perfect 😆
Oh yeah, that’s a keeper!
I hope that’s the plan.
I’ll do it if I can do it from home!
The government bureaucracy claim to “serve the pubic” by “serving the elected government” – the President and the Congress.
That has been exposed as a LIE.
But the “cynical” response that the government administrators are “only in it for the money and perks” has also been exposed as false.
The high administrators (and some of the low ones also) serve an ideology – one they were taught at school and university. And they are prepared, if need be, to sacrifice their pay and perks for this ideology.
In short PAUL MARKS WAS RIGHT ALL ALONG.
That’s what she said, Harry!
Is this the same person who writes for the Observer? Some of her colleagues’ heads liable to explode!
It has probably been like a decade now where I got this idea about that game ‘king of the hill.’ As long as there is a hill, multiple idiots are going to want to be king- bad enough to spend their time and money trying to charge up that hill. And the libertarian strategy has been to try and convince everybody not to use the hill. This does not work. People still charge up the hill, and other people seem to like having a king on the hill.
So, what if you put a king who demoralizes the hell out of all the hill climbers, and then take the hill down while nobody is looking?