We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
“Does destroying ivory save elephants” – the Guardian seeks your views For the last hour as of 13.34 GMT, the Guardian has been running what it calls an ‘eco audit” asking readers to give their views on whether the destruction of ivory stocks helps save elephants as a species.
I was pleased and surprised to see comments running strongly in favour of the answer ‘no’. The first comment is typical:
It’s a stupid move. It just makes the price of contraband ivory go up and kills more elephants.
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
Whoa. A smidgeon of economic common sense appears among the Guardianista? Whodathunkit?
Does destroying beef stocks save cattle?
Auction off the ivory, and use the funds to protect those elephants that remain
I agree with Mike Giles above. It seems to me that by the time Heffalumps are Ivory it’s a bit too late!
If you want to save elephants, the answer is easy. Privatise them, and legalise the sale of ivory.
I still want to know why we can’t farm them, if ivory is so valuable.
You could of course just knock them out with a tranquiliser gun, take the ivory and leave the elephant. Not sure how essential the tusks are to them. If they are then replace them with a nice carbon fibre tusk, maybe in a ‘safety vest’ yellow colour.
This guy’s coffee companion temporarily had the right idea.
Ah! this is more Guardianist
“I think this decision by France echoes a global sentiment that owning ivory is no longer socially acceptable.”
Totally ignoring the elephant in the drawing room, there is no global sentiment or there wouldn’t be an ivory trade.
Wonder it’s possible to spot any of the little buggers when they’re hiding behind blades of grass.