We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

A possible breaththrough for Alzheimer’s sufferers

This is a development which, despite whatever natural skepticism that I might have about such items, could be enormously positive for the millions of people – not just the very old – who fall victim to the terrible disease of Alzheimer’s.

Samizdata quote of the day

The greatest passions, however, require privacy, and the good society would not deserve to be so-called if it lacked ample opportunities for seclusion and solitude. In work and in love, creativity requires time alone, to think and plan. Great, passionate works of art are not usually brought into existence by committee. The deepest friendships and loves also need time away from prying eyes to blossom; time to share intimacies not shared with others; time to build a special microcosm of private meaning within the wider, public world. A society devoid of privacy would be a society with no room for great passion, and hence not a place I would want to live. Warrantless wiretaps and extensive networks of closed-circuit television cameras have contributed to the United States and England being ranked alongside other “endemic surveillance societies” like Russia and China, according to Privacy International. But those who say, in defense of such invasive government actions, that people who have done nothing wrong have nothing to hide, reveal a profound misunderstanding of the importance of privacy. Privacy matters not because of the bad that it hides, but because of the good and the great that it nurtures.

Bradley Doucet

Defensive British dentistry

I believe I am the senior Samizdatista, in years if not in eloquence or influence. And one of the privileges of advancing years is the right to inflict upon strangers the details of one’s various medical infirmities and experiences. I can’t, yet, quite manage the truly, Platonically essential, shameless way of doing this, which is: in a very loud voice on the top deck of a double-decker bus. But, a blog is a satisfactory next best, so here goes. Stop whatever else you may be doing or trying to do, stop talking amongst yourselves, and listen to me.

A few months ago, a crown that had been attached to one of my disintegrating British teeth started to loosen, and about one month ago, this crown fell off. My non-British dentist advised that what remained of the real tooth was now useless and that it all should go. This was not a wisdom tooth; those are long gone. It was the next one in, top left. But I wouldn’t miss it, said my dentist. If I did, an “implant” could be contrived.

So, a week ago now, the tooth was duly removed. The NHS had been asked to do something about all this, as soon as the crown had become loose. But not a peep was heard from the NHS in three months (apparently a whole clutch of letters due to go out had been delayed for some obscure reason – waiting lists?), so when the crown finally did fall off, I decided to go private. Had I been content to lie about how much it was hurting (in reality it only started hurting after the tooth had been removed), the emergency bit of the NHS might have obliged. But, forced to choose, I preferred buying to lying, and so, for £150, the date was fixed and the deed was done.

Local anaesthetics do away with almost all pain, but I can’t get used to the notion that all that grinding and sawing is not hurting, and I love it when it ends. But taking out a tooth involves flesh, not just teeth. I had supposed that once the tooth had gone, any discomfort involved would end, but gouging out a tooth does damage. It does less damage if all of the tooth comes out in one go, but mine did not. After most of the tooth had been removed, a long, thin root remained, and further damage was done to my gum while that was dug out. So, not surprisingly when I actually thought about it, it was only when the local anaesthetic started to wear off that the serious discomfort began. The pain has by no means been unbearable, but it started out quite bad, and has still not truly abated. For a couple of days all but the smallest mouthful, the shallowest spoonful, involved a painfully slow wrenching open of the jaw. I am still chewing only with the other side of my mouth, not least because the hole takes time to fill itself in. Further dentistry may be required to this end.

Okay, so much for the shouting on a bus bit. Now it gets a little more officially Samizdata-esque. → Continue reading: Defensive British dentistry

Two magazine founders

“I just caught the last couple of minutes of a cable-TV documentary about Playboy magazine, which featured a clip of Hugh Hefner opining about the huge cultural impact the magazine has had in its 50-plus years of existence. And it struck me as an illustration that, even in the realm of culture and ideas, it’s the supply side that makes the greatest difference. Two young men in the mid-1950s had vastly different ideas of what the American audience really wanted and needed, and ventured forth to create magazines that reflected these views. Hugh Hefner, convinced that America was too sexually conservative and really needed to let its hair down, founded Playboy in 1953. Bill Buckley, convinced that America was too politically liberal and needed to restore its older, small-r republican virtues that had been eroded in the Progressive and New Deal eras, founded National Review in 1955. Now, think about how these ventures must have appeared at the time. Playboy was an outrage to conventional pieties about sexuality. National Review was an outrage to conventional pieties about politics. How much money would you have bet, at the time, that either one would survive for very long? “A dirty magazine? Won’t people be embarrassed to buy it?” “A magazine that’s to the right of Eisenhower and Nixon? Are there that many real fringies out there?” But the supply side takes a chance. And, quite amazingly, both ventures succeeded beyond imagining. Playboy bore fruit in the Sexual Revolution, which may already have reached its high point but shows little sign of receding. And from National Review emerged Reaganism, and conservatism as the broadly dominant system of political thought in recent years.”

Michael Potemra.

It is an interesting piece of commentary. Is it really true, though, that conservatism (however defined) is the “broadly dominant system of political thought in recent years”? I suppose it might be to the extent that the rise of Obama is in fact an aberration rather than anything else. But even if that is true, then it would be nice to see this reflected, long term, in the relative decline, not rise, of state power and spending.

Anyway, Hefner and Buckley were indeed very influential figures, no doubt about it. I have always had a lot of time for Hefner – he upsets the sort of people who need to be upset.

Update: Hefner has taken his business private.

Samizdata quote of the day

“For as long as I can remember, I have been shouting at my TV screen. Possibly the first occasion would have been circa 1971, in sheer irritation at the infuriating, self-defeatingly named kiddie programme Why Don’t You Just Switch Off Your Television Set And Go Out And Do Something Less Boring Instead? Perhaps it was even earlier than that. Though I liked Teddy, I used to find Andy Pandy incredibly wet. Bill and Ben were incomprehensible. The Clangers whistled too much. ZsaZsa the Cat and Kiki the Frog were quite maddening in the way they ganged up on Hector the Dog. As for Florence in the Magic Roundabout, what a goodie-goodie!”

James Delingpole

I would say that one of the great benefits of blogging has been that where before a person would get dangerously high blood pressure watching or hearing some drivel on the TV or radio, now they can work off this rage by blogging about it.

Apologies to non-UK readers who may not get the children’s TV references in the quote. That is why Wikipedia was invented!

Ireland chase down 327 to beat England at the Cricket World Cup

England are certainly contributing mightily to the enjoyability of the Cricket World Cup. Their first game, against the Netherlands, stayed interesting almost to the end, on account of the slogging inflicted on England by Ryan ten Doeschate. As a result of that, England had to make nearly three hundred. They did this, but had to bat very well. You kept thinking they might collapse and lose. That was the first really fun game of the tournament, all the previous games having been tediously one-sided demolitions of lesser teams by big teams.

Next up, England played India. India belted 338, and that looked beyond England, but at one stage England looked to be cruising it, until they lost two big wickets in two balls. Then they lost more wickets and looked well beaten. But then, the England tail wagged, and what do you suppose happened then? Only a tie!

And now, now, a true upset is in the offing, because Ireland, chasing England’s satisfactory but not stellar total of 327, and having at one stage been 111-5 (for Americans – that’s bad) are now, get this, 272-5 with all of nine overs left. For Americans – that’s good, really good. Ireland are now odds on to win this!

And the blogger’s curse strikes! Ireland have lost a wicket. A run out!

But this is not over yet, because the batsman who got out, Cusack, has most definitely been the junior partner in the huge stand of 162 that has just ended. At the other end, still batting, is a certain Kevin O’Brien and he is 101 not out, having smashed the record for the fastest (measured in deliveries faced) century in the history of the Cricket World Cup. O’Brien has hit six sixes, including the biggest one of the tournament so far.

WOW says my computer screen. Actually this was an advert for Weightwatchers, but for once an annoyingly interruptive advert hit the nail on the head.

The run rate has now fallen, and it is all getting even more tense. A few more big shots from O’Brien and Ireland will win this, but a close finish plays havoc with the mental equilibrium of even the best players. But, they’ve had a couple of streaky, snicky boundaries and need 34 from 29 balls, with four wickets left.

The funny thing is, even if England lose, they will probably make their way through to the quarter finals. Not a huge amount is at stake. But, if Ireland win, it will be, as they say, what the World Cup is all about!

32 from 26. Ireland now 300-6. Somebody called Mooney is now joining in, with a couple of great boundaries. 23 from 21. 20 from 18. 18 from 16. O’Brien is taking a breather, before what I am sure he hopes will be a triumphant assault, probably in the next over rather than the last one. Ireland won’t want to leave this to the very end. 16 from 13. Bosh! Mooney again! That really hurts England. 12 from 12, still with four wickets left. Even a hectic wicket strewn shambles by Ireland will still probably win this!

Now O’Brien is run out! He scored 113 from 63 deliveries. It’s anybody’s now. Now they’re showing the replay of the O’Brien run out. He had simply run out of puff, poor fellow. No wonder.

And somebody called Johnston hits his first ball, a full toss, to the boundary. Ireland need 7 from 10, and are right back to being hot favourites. 2 more to Johnston! 5 wanted from 8. Ireland 323-7. 4 from 7. One boundary does it. 3 to win from the last over. Mooney, 29 not out, on strike.

Ireland win. Biggest successful run chase at the World Cup, ever.

I was going to do serious things this afternoon. Oh well.

China and me

When I wish to buy cheap low end computer accessories (cables, card readers, laptop batteries, etc), I find that it is much cheaper to buy them on eBay from foreign sellers, rather than from anyone in the UK. I have been doing this for five years or more, and it is interesting to see where the items then come from. Five years ago, they were almost always from Hong Kong, with return addresses in places like Yuen Long. (“The unfashionable end of the western spiral arm of the New Territories”). The markets where the sellers get them from are actually over the border in Shenzhen in China proper, so I suspect that these sellers make regular trips to the markets over the border, bring stuff back, and then post it to buyers in the West.

I still get items from Hong Kong, but in recent times it has become more common for then to come from Shenzhen. I am not sure if this is due to another set of eBay sellers having come into being on the other side of the border, or if the same ones are simply posting from a post office on the other side of the border because this is cheaper. (How international postal services relate to one another, and whether and how much money is paid from the sender to the recipient national post office is a complete mystery to me, alas. I suspect it is as baroque as the equivalent system of international telephone call settlements (which I did understand) was before it collapsed under its own insanity. There are undoubtedly some hidden and probably unintentional subsidies somewhere here). My hunch is, “a little of both”. Some Hong Kong sellers posting in Shenzhen – some Shenzhen sellers.

In recent times, the items have occasionally been posted from Dongguan, part of essentially the same economic and manufacturing cluster as Shenzhen (although not a Special Economic Zone, but politically speaking just an ordinary prefecture level city in Guangdong province). However, far enough away from Hong Kong that Hong Kong people are not going to go there to buy and send stuff. Therefore, these sellers are definitely mainland Chinese.

And today, I received an item from Zhangpu in Fujian province, a good way north up the coast. This is one of the more prosperous regions of coastal China (south of the Special Economic Zone in Xiamen), but Hokkien rather than Cantonese speaking and far from recent European influence and probably a centre more for trade and investment from also Hokkien speaking Taiwan. It is interesting to see this sort of activity moving up the coast, but there is no sign of it moving inland. Of course, it is always going to be close to the factories.

However, write a little English, and the fact that you can sell stuff to people throughout at least the English speaking world has clearly been learned. As an observation, I have found such Chinese sellers to be reliable and honest in their dealings with me. They send you exactly what they say, the products all work properly, and if there is any kind of problem (such as a missing item due to postal problems) they are eager to resolve it. An excellent eBay reputation is very important to such people. This works so well that I don’t actually bother looking at eBay feedback from Chinese sellers before buying: I simply assume that the system has weeded unreliable and dishonest sellers out automatically.

On the other hand, this particular purchase was a card reader, for which I paid a total of £1.67. including postage. eBay fees might amount to about 20p. The postage label says that postage cost ¥9.60, which is at present equal to about 90p. This leaves about 57p to pay for the card reader. Allowing the seller a modest 17p profit, we are left with a card reader coming out of the factory no more than 40p (and possibly a good deal less, depending on how many middle men there are), which is a miniscule sum of money.

My preferred conclusion from this is that economies of scale are wonderful, capitalism is grand, and modern technology is awesome, in that technological products all become so cheap so fast that almost nobody has to be excluded from owning them. And this is true, of course, although I worry about something else. When capital is too cheap due to excessively easy credit, all kinds of capital intensive businesses appear to be profitable, when in reality they are receiving a subsidy from the banking system. (Another, non-Chinese example: a large portion of Europe-Asia air travel has in recent years been taken over by airlines based in the Middle East Gulf states. The cost of capital of these airlines is artificially low, as they are implicitly backed by the oil wealth of Abu Dhabi. Whether they would be profitable with out this, it’s hard to tell).

China’s banking system is incredibly opaque. The bits that we can see aren’t especially pleasant to look at. And of course, opaque = bad, pretty much by definition. When everything unwinds, the consequences will be unpleasant, featuring scenarios that will appear oddly familiar to us. Government bailouts of banks, savers being robbed of the value of their savings, and inflation, perhaps. And perhaps this is already happening. £1.67 is actually a bit on the high side, compared to prices I was paying for similar items a few months back.

Mars needs Billionaires

This is not going to be your usual Samizdata article, if there is indeed any thing usual about articles on Samizdata. However, I strongly suspect his will be the first mission study ever published here, and I should know since I am responsible for most of the space blather around these parts.

I recently got my hands on an interesting NASA study for a deep space manned spaceship called the Nautilus. The more I have thought about the concepts behind the power points, the more excited I have become as to the possibilities… for a private Mars mission.

The NASA design study is interesting because if I were a many times over billionaire or consortium of billionaires, I could buy the majority of the vehicle today using hardware that is flight tested or is an incremental advance on such commercial goods. Nearly everything else one would need will be in that category by the end of the decade, with the exception of two important components. More on that later.

Nautilus spaceship
The Nautilus Deep space ship concept.
Image: NASA

To build this for a reasonable price we must avoid R&D where ever possible; we must avoid shaving pounds or adding efficiency or elegance for the sake of doing so. Given that criteria, I want to buy:

  • A keel made out of one or more ISS truss segments. The only changes are the number and location of various attachment points.
  • A set of Bigelow Aerospace Habs used for cargo holds lining the keel.
  • A rotating joint good for many years of operation in vacuum.
  • A rather largish ion engine with its fuel tanks and plumbing.
  • A toroidal habitation module made out of specially designed Bigelow Habs.
  • A Masten Aerospace or Armadillo Aerospace lander for Mars orbit operations.

→ Continue reading: Mars needs Billionaires