We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Nothing ever changes

Nigel Meek has been doing some digging around in the archives.

Having flicked through a digest of British politician’s speeches about the war, and looking at just the contributions from some members of the Labour Party, four themes seem to stand out.

  1. Devotion to the United Nations as the only real legitimising agency before, during, and after the war.

  2. That because of the various dealings that we may indeed have had with the regime in the past, it is therefore unacceptably hypocritical of us to tackle them now.

  3. Pessimism about the eventual outcome.

  4. Irrespective of the outcome, a belief that it will be extremely costly not least to our own side.

Iraq in 2003? No, the Falkland Islands in 1982.

For reasons that I won’t bore anyone with, earlier today I was puttering around the Latin American section of the University of London’s library at Senate House. My eyes fell on a dusty tome entitled “The Falkland’s Campaign: A Digest of Debates in the House of Commons, 2 April to 15 June 1982” published by HMSO, London.

By a remarkable coincidence, the book fell open at a speech by none other than that master of decisiveness, Robin Cook. Randomly dipping further into the book, it was eerie to read the ‘usual suspects’ such as Cook and Tony Benn making the same speeches then as they’ve been doing two decades later. It’s as if they’ve had their secretaries scan in their old speeches from Hansard, convert them into Microsoft Word documents, and then use Word’s find and replace facility to swap ‘Argentina’ and ‘Iraq’.

There was even dear old Tam Dalyell using the words ‘South Atlantic’, ‘mire’, and ‘Vietnam’ in one speech!

3 comments to Nothing ever changes

  • dave fordwych

    It brings me back to a thought I’ve often had lately.
    Just how many times do these people need to be on the wrong side of history before they are hunted out of public life?How many of the things they believe in need to be proved to be rubbish before we never ever have to hear from them again?

  • Dave,

    I am as bemused as you are and it isn’t just over this Iraq thing either. Time and time again the Tony Benns and George Galloways and Robin Cooks of this world make complete idiots out of themselves without having to pay a single penny piece in terms of either reputation or career. They just keep getting elected regardless of the number of times they are proved to be wrong about just about everything.

    Sickening.