Maybe I imagined it.
I thought I saw the first few seconds of a scary video, either put out by the Home Office “Prevent” scheme or by some NGO with a similar remit. The video featured a teenage actor – white and male, obviously – portraying a boy lamenting that he had got a criminal record after impulsively posting hate speech online. I remembered the title as being something like “It just takes a few seconds to get a criminal record” or “It only takes a few words to get a criminal record”. From what little I saw of it, the video seemed more sinister than 99% of the hate speech it aimed to combat – because it was not put out by some Twitter-addled rando with thirteen followers but by His Majesty’s government, or an organisation closely associated with the same.
Ya know how it is. I just saw a second or two and thought, “I might blog about that”, but I was too busy to note it down. And now it’s disappeared. I put a query into CoPilot, which might have been unwise, and got this:
🔗 Official Home Office Video Link
🎥 “It Just Takes a Few Words to Get a Criminal Record” — UK Government (Prevent)
YouTube (Official UK Government Channel): https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8hE1G9FqJw (youtube.com in Bing)
This is the authentic version of the video you’re looking for. It’s produced as part of the UK Government’s counter extremism and online safety messaging aimed at young people.
📌 What this video covers
• Warns young people that posting extremist or hateful content online can lead to:
o Arrest
o Prosecution
o A criminal record
• Uses a serious, cautionary tone
• Shows teen actors in realistic online scenarios
• Designed to discourage impulsive posting of harmful content
The link https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G8hE1G9FqJw says “This video isn’t available anymore”
That “anymore” suggests it did once exist, but I am beginning to wonder if I did not hallucinate the whole thing and spur the A.I. to join in my hallucination by means of my prompts.
Assuming I did not imagine it, can I get this video back from the void? I’ve tried the Wayback Machine without success.
UPDATE: That was quick. My thanks to commenter nbc who said, “This one?”
Yes. This one.
https://xcancel.com/Steve_Laws_/status/2029317472059359438
It took me about a second of scrolling down from that post to find views expressed by Steve Laws that I strongly disagreed with. For instance, he mocks Laurence Fox for saying, in the context of the child-killer Ian Huntley being attacked and killed by another prisoner, that even the most depraved criminals should be protected from vigilante justice in prison. Steve Laws appears to be an actual far-right person. They do exist. But as I have said before, “if there is a truth respectable people shy away from mentioning, do not be surprised when the despicable people who will say it aloud are listened to.”
The video appears to have been put out by the police rather than the Home Office, and shows a boy – not “a boy” in the sense of “a young man”; a child of about thirteen – tearfully saying “I just got all my devices taken away by the police. My mum couldn’t believe it. I might get a criminal record and not be able to go to college. I only shared a link. I just thought it was funny. But it was terrorist content, and that is not a game, it’s real life.”
That is a deeply sinister message for the police to be putting out, particularly in that it is aimed at children.
ANOTHER UPDATE: Ted Schuerzinger has provided a direct link to the video: https://www.instagram.com/terrorismpolice/reel/DVd1g1bkg7I/. It came from an Instagram account called “terrorismpolice”. The final frame shows a police logo and the words:
COUNTER TERRORISM POLICING
A.C.T.|ACTION COUNTERS TERRORISM
WHAT YOU SHARE LEAVES A TRACE
CLICK TO FIND OUT MORE
and the caption to the Instagram video says,
Has your child spotted our latest campaign on their feed? 👀
We’ve launched a digital campaign aimed at teenage boys to highlight the real-world consequences of sharing harmful extremist content online.
The content is being promoted on platforms young people already use, to reach them where they are.
Our message is simple: sharing extremist material can lead to serious legal and life-changing consequences.
It’s not just a laugh. What you share leaves a trace.
Learn more about the campaign and the message behind it via the link in our story.
Two questions occur to me:
1) Why was the video removed from YouTube? Hostile comments?
2) Is the video an accurate portrayal of the likely “real-world consequences of sharing harmful extremist content online” when the sharer is a child and the content is something the child shares because they think it is funny? If it is not an accurate portrayal, then the police officers or police employees who made the video are deliberately frightening children with misinformation regarding the law. People have had the police turn up at their doors to issue a “friendly warning” for less. If, however, it is an accurate portrayal of the real world – that is, if children really are being given criminal records for sharing (not creating, sharing) comic memes of whose extremist origin they were unaware, then we are further along than even I thought.
This one?
Note that “Steve Laws” can’t be bothered to give a link to the original video. Grok claims that the UK counter-terrorism police have an Instagram account which is where a video would be posted. Going through that eventually led to this page which looks like the video Steve retweeted.
More likely they were worried about it being virally piss taken like the Amelia videos
Someone with A.I. skills ought to replace that “it was terrorist content!” line with “it showed the Flag of England!”
An evil (yes – evil) video – threatening children.
And made by the same establishment that claim that Britain has Freedom of Speech and that Freedom of Speech is precious to them.
May the lies of the establishment turn to ashes in their throats – and choke them.
“And made by the same establishment that claim that Britain has Freedom of Speech and that Freedom of Speech is precious to them.”
Well, the ring was precious to Gollum and he ate babies. Allegedly.
Doesn’t it seem strange to anyone else that they’re using the scenario of a child being punished for posting the wrong(think) thing on social media, when they intend to ban children from being on social media at all?
The “terrorist content” video was on not the bee a few days ago, but if there is any way to get to content from previous days they don;t make it easy to find. I guess you guys already know the purple haired girl.
anon – not really strange, when we remember that the establishment is evil, very evil indeed. They do not have horns and tails and they do not tend to scream and shout – their evil is that of officials who just do not care about how much suffering they inflict, their evil is “banal” – it is the “banality of evil”. They do not really care if the people they punish have done the things they are punishing them for – they are just doing paper work.
NickM and Mr Weinberg – yes indeed Gentleman, yes indeed.
They don’t have horns or tails?
I had an American girlfriend, J, many years ago. She studied at Cornell. She got in on a scholarship (though her parents were solidly wealthy enough). She had a roomie from NYC who was there on a “diversity” scholarship. When the roomie found out J was Jewish she asked J whether she’d had plastic surgery to remove her horns. I wish I was making this up.
NickM – an aunt of mine (who was blond – and so “could not be Jewish”) also heard the one about Jews having horns.
Clearly when I went bald I had my horns removed.