There are some who maybe still claim Jeremy Corbyn isn’t an antisemite. But he is one of a number of openly antisemitic Jew haters sitting as MPs.
That is frightening.
Here he is spreading horrendous lies about Israel – lies of murder and organ removal.
These lies are already… pic.twitter.com/ZJduHGbKjP— Nicole Lampert (@nicolelampert) February 23, 2026
This tweet (https://x.com/nicolelampert/status/2026017118341263795) from Nicole Lampert shows a 45 second video of Jeremy Corbyn, former Leader of the Opposition and twice the Labour Party’s candidate to be Prime Minister. In it, he says,
‘[I got a message] from the director of Al Shifa Hospital in Gaza. And he said there had been a delivery of boxes to the hospital by the IDF. A large number of boxes, 60 or 70 boxes. And after the IDF had gone off, they opened the boxes. And each one contained the skull of a Palestinian who had been killed. And there were also delivered [sic] of bodies of dead women in Pala- in Gaza – that had been opened and some of the organs removed. I mean, it’s hard to describe this. That is what is happening to the people of Palestine.’
As Alex Hearn said said in the comments, “He won’t believe British intelligence about a Russian chemical attack in Salisbury but he’ll believe a fantasy from Hamas run Gaza.”
There is a slightly longer version of the same video from CAMERA UK here: https://x.com/CAMERAorgUK/status/2026229835803107332. This starts a few seconds earlier than Nicole Lampert’s video and includes Mr Corbyn saying that he got the message from the director of Al Shifa Hospital on Thursday or Friday morning.
In case you are wondering, no, I do not believe the director of Al Shifa Hospital (who appears to be Dr Mohammed Abu Salmiya, although I would like Mr Corbyn to specify who gave him this message) for a moment. Not just because he is the head of an organisation controlled by Hamas, although that would be enough in itself to make me disbelieve him, but because this claim is identical in form to a centuries long stream of anti-Jewish blood libels about Jews murdering Christians or Muslims to harvest their bodies. The old version, exemplified by Little St Hugh of Lincoln had the Jews killing Christians as human sacrifices, usually with the additional detail that the Jews baked the victims’ bodies into their matzos, the unleavened bread served at Passover. This religious version of the blood libel is almost dead in Europe but still commonplace among Palestinians, including academics like Dr Samar Maqusi, formerly of University College London. The slightly updated version drops the matzos and has organ-harvesting as the motive instead. This one is very common among Palestinians and increasingly common among Westerners – witness the Right Honourable Jeremy Corbyn MP speaking in February 2026.
Why does Corbyn think the IDF would bring these boxes of skulls and dismembered corpses to Al Shifa hospital? [Update: OK, someone in the comments to the CAMERA post says the ceasefire agreement required the IDF return unidentified human remains to Gaza. But in that case the director of Al-Shifa hospital would know perfectly well what was going on, and it does not explain why there were claimed to be boxes of skulls in particular, nor why a medical doctor would specifically claim that women’s internal organs had been removed.]
Did Corbyn think to ask the director of Al-Shifa Hospital what he did with them? If the IDF ever deliver any boxes of skulls and corpses with missing organs to me, I’ll be sure and contact all the world’s most eminent forensic pathologists so they can carry out post mortems and give the evidence to the world.
Another update: This was no “misspeaking”. Jeremy Corbyn has publicly made the same allegation in more detail within the last few days. In the comments to the CAMERA post, someone called SHO_MY links to a video posted at 3:03pm on 23 Feb 2026 (https://x.com/EL4JC/status/2025949713292296383) from a pro-Corbyn account called #EL4C @EL4JC:
Devastating.
Jeremy Corbyn shares reports from Gaza:
Boxes full of skulls handed over by the Israeli occupying forces.
Bodies with severed hands.
Abdomens surgically cut open & restitched.
It’s like a horror film but it’s much worse. It’s the reality of Gaza. pic.twitter.com/sHOmGy1DMJ
— #EL4C (@EL4JC) February 23, 2026
In the video Corbyn is addressing a public meeting. In his speech he says,
‘I’m going to read something to you. If you’ve already heard it, please be patient. If you haven’t, please be prepared to be shocked. I got a statement this morning from my good friend Doctor Mustafa Barghouti who’s an independent member of the Palestine National Initiative, a member of the Palestine National Assembly, and he’s forwarded me a statement by the director of Al-Shifa Medical Complex, Gaza, and I’m going to read it to you. “The director of Al-Shifa Medical Complex stated that approximately 10,000 individuals remain missing underneath the rubble across the Gaza Strip. Of these, around 5,000 persons are unaccounted for and their fate remains unknown. He further reported that 66 boxes were received yesterday from the occupying authorities – that’s the IDF – containing only the skulls of deceased victims. In addition, the bodies of women were handed over with no information provided regarding the location or circumstances of their abduction. According to the director, some of the returned bodies showed signs of severe mutilation including severed hands, while others had their abdomens surgically opened and subsequently restitched. Thus these findings raise great, raise grave concerns. He warned of credible indications of organ theft from the bodies of martyrs in the Gaza Strip, describing these acts as serious violations of international humanitarian law and human dignity.” And that I just received this morning. Just think about that statement. And I’ve no reason to disbelieve anything Mustafa Barghouti says, or the director of Al Shifa Medical Complex.’
I do.
And I ask again, what has the director of Al-Shifa Medical Complex done with these bodies that he says show credible indications of organ theft? What action has he taken to get what he believes to be evidence of a horrible crime out to the world so that impartial outside observers can assess it? What is he doing to get these “credible indications” of organ theft either proved or disproved?
It is important to remember that Jeremy Corbyn is not a particularly clever or well educated man. I think he got a couple of A Levels from grammar school, and then embarked on a degree course in trade union studies from a poly, which he did not complete. He then got a job with a public sector trade union, immersed himself in left wing politics, became a Labour MP, and his intellectual development, such as it was, ended.
He has lived in the echo chamber of extreme leftism for about 50 years, and that is bound to send you mad eventually. Sadly, this seems to have been the case. There can be no hope for his recovery now.
I am not in the least surprised. He has been heading in this direction at high speed for many years.
What does surprise me is the number of people who want to believe this sort of vicious calumny.
I’ve had more than enough of the dismal grief-mongers of Gaza. And I have really had more than enough of ghoulish shi’ite stirrers like Corbyn.
The lies that Mr Corbyn comes out with today, the establishment echoes tomorrow.
It will not be long before Sir Ed “Israel is committing genocide” Davey of the Liberal Democrats, is trotting out the lies that Mr Corbyn is trotting out today.
As for the philosophical root of all this, it is NOT the National Socialists and so on just believed that “Jews are different” – the sort of drivel “liberals” come out with on Holocaust Memorial Day and other times, no – Jew haters believe that Jews “oppress and exploit” other people and this is why Jews are, supposedly, richer or more successful in the arts and sciences than other people – if everyone is inherently equal (the foundation of egalitarian thought) and one group of people is more successful (in various fields) than other people – it MUST by-definition mean that this group of people is “oppressing and exploiting” other groups of people – such as “the Palestinians”. The Nazis did NOT want to exterminate black people or Slavs – they want to make slaves of them, the Nazis wanted to exterminate Jews because they, the Nazis, believed that Jews were vicious – that they “oppressed and exploited” other people, and that this was the cause of Jewish success.
Those Jewish people who are themselves egalitarians (leftist Jews) do not grasp that this way of thinking leads to the Gas Chambers.
As for Mr Corbyn – he wrote the forward to the new edition (published a few years ago – and, to be fair to Mr Corbyn, he rows back a bit on some, some, of the doctrines of Hobson) of Mr Hobson’s early 1900s book on Imperialism (a book that influenced the work of Lenin on this subject) – Mr Hobson, a radical “liberal” (a sort of Sir Ed Davy of the early 1900s) believed that the British Empire was based on “exploitation and oppression” and that, secretly, the British Empire was controlled by Jews.
Mr Hobson also believed that government spending was a positive good for the economy, and should be financed by creating “money” from nothing.
Mr Hobson would have loved the Britain, indeed the world, of 2026, no more British Empire, open season on “Jewish exploiters” and lots and lots of money created from nothing, and endless government spending.
JohnK – Mr Jeremy Corbyn is worse educated than you think he is, in spite of his parents spending a lot of money on his education – he got no “A” levels at all, in American terms he did not graduate High School. He went off to the Caribbean for some years (there is also a missing time period in his life story), and that is about it.
However, his well qualified brother Piers Corbyn – also hates Israel, with the same bovine excrement “reasoning” about “exploitation and oppression”.
I’m so old I remember [from like last year] a doctor in Gaza claiming Israel had weapons that “dissolved the bodies”, which is why there was no evidence of their evil crimes.
Evidently that magic device just teleported them for decapitation or organ removal?
Or it’s all just idiot lies, and one has to be either an utter fool or desirous of them being true to believe them. (Or both, as Corbyn seems to be.)
Does anybody listen the Corbyn anymore? I saw on the news some thing about Hilary Clinton laughably demanding the release of the “Epstein files” whatever that means. And the thing that struck me is: does anyone, anywhere care what she thinks anymore? Same with Corbyn. I mean why even give oxygen to him here on this blog?
Paul:
FWIW, Wikipedia claims that Corbyn scraped two grade “E” A Levels, and then started a degree in “Trade Union Studies” at North London Poly, where he lasted a year. He did some VSO in Jamaica, and then spent time in South America admiring leftism in action. He got a job at the Tailoring and Garment Workers’ Union (how quaint that sounds now, from a time when Britain had a clothing manufacturing industry), and then a a job with NUPE. The rest is history. Or infamy.
So he has a low standard of education, and has never had a job which was not part of the leftist blob. It is no surprise that he has finally succumbed to madness.
An appalling display of mindless and vicious prejudice. Has he no ability to reason, to dig into things? Is he just a parrot with skills in wheeling and dealing? Horrible to see combined with such malice.
I have seen some reports that the second Corbyn video, the one in which he addresses a crowd, may be old news, although EL4C only posted the link to the clip yesterday. Apparently there was a meeting on the topic of Gaza addressed by Corbyn in Islington Assembly Hall on 23rd May 2024 during which he said something that sounds very similar to what is shown in the clip.
Not that finding out that Jeremy Corbyn has a long history of promoting this sort of conspiracy theory would make much difference to my point.
What in principle is the difference between anti-semitism and islamophobia?
John K.
Anything below a “C” is a fail – if someone says I have an “E Grade” Advanced Level, that is worse than not sitting the examination at all.
If someone does not do the course and sit the exam they might have passed it (who knows?) – but if someone goes through two years of training at an expensive school and gets an “E” – that says rather bad things about them.
But it matters little – after all his brother Piers Morgan, and “Sir Ed” Davey of the Liberal Democrats have plenty of qualifications – and they are both vicious “Israel is committing genocide” lying scum.
Deveril – the difference is numbers and attitude.
Jews have never tried to impose Jewish law on other peoples, and Jews are only about 0.5% of the population of England anyway.
Islam is an expansionist (Imperialist) faith – that is not a criticism, it is a theological and historical fact. Islam does not claim just a bit of land, about he size of Wales, in the Middle East – it claims the world, and always has done. And the followers of Islam are a lot more than 0.5% of the population of England and are rapidly increasing.
As for “Islamophobia” that word, in practice, means taking Islam seriously – understanding what Mohammed taught and personally did, and how his followers have pushed this agenda for 14 centuries. Prime Minister Gladstone was, by this definition, an “Islamophobe” as was Winston Churchill – and just about everyone else in the West before the 1960s, when the whitewashing of Islam really got under way.
Raymond Ibrahim (and others) explains how, increasingly over time, Primary sources (history written at the time – or close to it) were either ignored or wildly distorted in the writing of history and theology (concerning Islam) in books written in the West – not only Primary sources written by Christians, but even Primary sources written by Muslims. The main books published and pushed in the West since the 1960s are so wildly wrong, they are, basically, works of fiction.
For example, a false picture of Islamic Spain is presented by “mainstream” books and television shows – a picture exposed as false by the corrective book “The Myth of the Andalusian Paradise”. And generations of children in the West have been taught that Ancient Greek was forgotten in the West and had to be reintroduced by Islamic scholars – which both ignores the fact that some of those “Islamic scholars” were NOT followers of Islam, and the fact that Italy never lost contact with the Byzantine (East Roman – Greek speaking, and although it was NOT Ancient Greek there were always scholars in Constantinople who understood Ancient Greek) world (are we really to believe that such places as the Republic of Venice needed Islamic Spain for knowledge of Greek?). Even in distant Ireland there were scholars of Greek during the “Dark Ages”.
Is it “Islamophobic” to say that people should NOT be punished for mocking Mohammed, and that people should NOT be punished for leaving Islam and following some other religion (or no religion at all) – if so, then the label “Islamophobe” should be worn with pride.
A phobia is an irrational fear or hatred.
When part of the UK has a major influx of Jews, even hardcore hats-and-sidelocks Jews, it does not cause an inexorable rise of rapes, terrorism, and the emergence of overtly sectarian politics.
Islam on the other hand…
A phobia is an irrational fear or hatred.
When part of the UK has a major influx of Jews, even hardcore hats-and-sidelocks Jews, it does not cause an inexorable rise of rapes, terrorism, and the emergence of overtly sectarian politics.
Islam on the other hand…
Ok, what if we re-name anti-semitism ‘jew-o-phobia’? Isn’t that what anti-semitism is, really? Surely, fear of Islam and Jews can be both rational and irrational?
I am struggling to see how anti-semitism is not, in fact, the trojan horse by which all other aspects of the woke catechism – sexist, racist, misogynist, transphobe, fascist – were then called into play.
In other words, whilst I would accept that (ironically) anti-semitism has become de rigueur – particularly amongst those most woke on the other issues – if it remains on the right respectable to criticise anti-semitism then why is it acceptable to tolerate equal and opposite attitudes towards Muslims?
If it helps, I think my own view is to hell with all of this. Let us call a spade a spade and a kike a kike and a raghead a raghead and a limey a limey, and so on. Let’s insult each other to kingdom come. It is the English way, and it is a good and healthy way.
The original sin, so it seems to me, was the attempt by those campaigning against anti-semitism to carve out a special exemption for themselves, because if they can have that then why should not others?
Paul,
I was going to say that! There are large sections of the Qu’ran, the Hadith and the Sunnah which are deemed “Islamophobic” to quote. Yes, quoting the prophet’s own divine words can land you in trouble.
Such as:
– Qu’ran 9:5
That is the word of Allah Himself!
@NickM
I was going to say that! There are large sections of the Qu’ran, the Hadith and the Sunnah which are deemed “Islamophobic” to quote. Yes, quoting the prophet’s own divine words can land you in trouble.
Numbers 15:32 (Or the Jews would call this book BiMidvar “In the Wilderness”)
Now while the children of Israel were in the wilderness, they found a man gathering sticks on the Sabbath day…Then the Lord said to Moses, “The man must surely be put to death; all the congregation shall stone him with stones outside the camp.”
All Bibles have terrible things to say. It is the nature of bringing pre modern morality into the modern day.
However, regarding anti-Semitism verses Islamophobia, I don’t thing you should hate anyone for their religious beliefs, especially since most people treat religion as a buffet, taking the bits they like and ignoring the bits they don’t. But I think we should use empirical evidence to assess risk and the biggest risk from Jews, as a general rule, is eating too much of the great food their culture produces. Whereas the biggest risk from Islam involves suicide vests and concerts full of little girls. As I have said many times I know a lot of Muslims and they are all lovely people who are horrified that some people have done terrible things in the name of their god.
Deveril – the difference is between telling the truth and lying.
The statements made by Gladstone and others, most importantly by Mohammed himself, about Islam – were true.
What Mr Corbyn (and Mr Carlson and Candace Owens) say about Jews – is untrue.
NickM – one of the milder quotations.
Fraser Orr.
As I have told you before – Islam attacked the Jews for not carrying out the scriptures on such things as stoning people to death. indeed covering these passages of scripture with their hand when reading the Torah – to prevent accidentally reading them aloud. As Rabbis had long rejected these punishments. “Raise your hand” was the mocking cry – and it did NOT mean surrender, it was meant literally – raise your hand from these passages and carry them out (as Muslims do).
There is no authority in Islam that can change scripture or disregard it – and Mohammed made it quite clear, for example, that men who mocked him must-be-killed, and that men who left Islam, or who claimed to follow Islam but refused to obey, must-be-killed.
“Most people religion as a buffet, taking the bits they like and ignoring the bits they don’t”.
Islam can not be treated in this way Fraser Orr n(indeed the penalty for doing that, in Islamic Law, is death)- and if you think it can, then you are as lacking in knowledge as former President George Walker Bush.
You yourself mention terrorist attacks (and one could argue that the specific attack you mention was AGAINST Islamic law – as infidel girls are to be taken by the right hand, not killed – the argument FOR the attack was that it would fill the infidels with fear and make them clamp down still harder on “Islamophobia” in order to appease the faithful, which was TRUE, the infidels reacted in exactly the cowardly way that was predicted “the community must not be divided” “Diversity – Inclusion, down with Hate Speech!”) – but this is actually one of the milder dangers.
And someone can not be a Muslim and reject Islamic conquest – for it is the duty of a Muslim to support this. Do I need to tell you the penalty for claiming to be a Muslim whilst not really being one?
It is permissible, for tactical reasons (to deceive infidels) , to PRETEND to be horrified by Islamic advance – but to actually be horrified by it, is not permissible.
Any Muslim who really does regret Islamic advance – has left Islam, and the penalty for that is…..
How many Jews were in Gaza at the start of October 7th 2023?
None – none at all.
There was no “occupation” – all Jews had been removed twice, in the 1940s (as part of the general purge of Jews in Islamic controlled lands – odd that the “international community” does not care about the destruction of Jewish communities in the Middle East that had existed for centuries before there was any such thing as Islam) and in 2005 – when the Israeli military, by force, removed all Jews from Gaza.
But the forces of Islam attacked anyway – not a few “terrorists” thousands of Islamic warriors – with the support of the population of Gaza, who celebrated the mass rape and murder – as did the forces of Islam, and their allies, around the world.
Around the world – including Britain. The “protests”, really celebrations, started at once – before Israel had done anything in reply to the attack – around the world the forces of Islam, and their leftist allies (the Red-Green alliance) celebrated the mass rape and mass murder – which was not in response to any “occupation” as there was no occupation.
And yet Marco Rubio and others talk of “peacefully living alongside” the forces of Islam in Gaza and around the world.
Most Muslims are good people (well, OK – but the same can be said of most people, most of the time). They are good (or OK) as people because they aren’t very good Muslims. My local corner shop is run by Pakistani Muslims and they sell booze! The issue is when Muslims start taking their religion seriously. When that happens Hell follows. The same cannot be said for Jews (who have no interest in spreading their faith – big difference) or even assorted Christian and “Christian”* groups (who do). There is a massive difference between, for example, silent prayer vigils outside abortion clinics and blowing-up the Ariana Grande gig in Manchester. I’m not a fan of Ms Grande because I’m a middle-aged bloke. Her fanbase is teen and pre-teen girls. An ideology has to be utterly sick to target them in the name of God.
So why? Well, Islam is unusual in many ways. It is a total ideology with rules from everything from personal grooming to how a state should be run and every stop inbetween. It is also unusual in that it was very much the work of one man. It is much easier to regard religion as a buffet when it is the work of many over centuries than a faith which is so distilled as Islam is. Islam is the work of one man over 23 years.
In a way that perhaps no other significant religious text is the Qu’ran has a very tight focus. If you look-up a surah then you’ll probably see it in Arabic with an English translation with the rather odd caveat, “interpretation of meaning”. Jibrael gave the literal Word of Allah to Muhammed in C7 Arabic and that is the absolute, non-negotiable Truth.
*I mean the likes of the LDS or the Jehovah’s Witnesses both of which are well known for killing sprees…
@NickM
The issue is when Muslims start taking their religion seriously.
But it is a problem when ANYONE starts taking their religion very seriously. If Christians and Jews took their religion seriously they’d be killing gay people and burning witches at the stake. Although the Bible has almost nothing to say on abortion still Christians get pretty up in arms about it and try to pass laws on it. For sure Christians an Jews are emasculated by modern morality, but were those constraints taken off it would be pretty bad. I mean look at history. I’d remind you that “nobody expects the Spanish Inquisition”.
It is why I think the Church of England is the best Christian denomination. All the “be nice to people” and “come join our community” without taking the whole religion part too seriously.
The challenge that you are observing with Islam is not so much a special feature of their religion, just that it hasn’t been quite so emasculated by the renaissance and modern morality the way Judaism and Christianity have. Those Muslims who have integrated into modern society are perfectly lovely people.
If there is a lesson to learn here it is that an immigration policy the doesn’t demand integration and allows balkanization within our own countries (something that has become a runaway problem in both Britain and the USA) is like inviting the Spanish inquisition back to town. We need modern Muslims not 10th century Muslims.
Then, given the huge world-wide record of Islamic mass murders over the decades, I’d have to posit that millions of Muslims take their own religion seriously, while hardly anyone else in the world does.
So it still ends up as a problem with Islam. Islam IS the common-point amongst so much human death and misery. “But not all” – fine, let the nice Muslims start helping to clean up their own faith community.
We always bend over backwards to NOT judge by group standards, but especially in voluntary groupings, that’s wrong. Religion isn’t an immutable characteristic. The Muslim in Nigeria who isn’t killing his Christian neighbors for religion needs to step up and reclaim his religion from the wacko mullahs, lest he be justifiably counted among them.
@bobby b
The Muslim in Nigeria who isn’t killing his Christian neighbors for religion needs to step up and reclaim his religion from the wacko mullahs, lest he be justifiably counted among them.
Certainly, and equally we need to say to those who are behaving decently “you are one of us and we stand with your in opposing them.” If instead we say “Islam is the problem and you are just another one of those terrorists” then we make it vastly more difficult for them to do what you’d have them do.
And Islam, and all religion, is a lot more than the precepts of the religious doctrine. It is a culture and a society, just as Christianity and Judaism are. I am not a religious person but I am still part of the broader “Christian society” in terms of my cultural adaptions. Muslims are no different. It is a culture as well as a religion, and asking people to abandon that culture just because some small group of whackos have associated it with craziness is not fair at all. There is a lot that is beautiful and delightful in the Muslim culture, though for sure there are many bad things too.
I have spent time in the Middle East, and I can assure you the Muslim country of the UAE is a delightful place, and the Muslim country of Iran is a horrific place. And most Muslim countries live somewhere between these two extremes. And that, I think, is largely true of Muslim people just as much as Muslim countries.
I have already explained this matter in detail – if Fraser Orr, or others, choose to ignore the facts – that is up to them.
However, whether they choose to ignore the facts or not – the facts will not ignore them.
As is made clear, for example, by the Mayor of Dearborn Michigan – who stated, in public and “as Mayor” (his own words) that people (in this case a Christian pastor) who questioned supporting Islamic attacks were “not welcome” in Dearborn.
The Mayor was then overwhelmingly reelected. It was a secret ballot – no one had to vote for this person, they choose to vote for him – because they-agree-with-him.
So much for Islam being a “buffet” from which people “choose what they like and leave the rest”.
I do not know how they could be more obvious (more open) – but some people continue to insist on an ostrich strategy, of sticking their heads in the sand.
The idea that they “just” want to exterminate the Jews (whilst reversing the truth and dishonestly pretending that the Jews want to commit “genocide” against them – as their corrupt allies, such as “Sir Ed” Davey also say) is FALSE.
They are NOT going to leave you alone – they are not a “buffet” from which people can “choose what they like – and leave the rest”.
The same self delusion that is ruining Western Europe seems to have taken root in the United States.
bobby b, re this, “The Muslim in Nigeria who isn’t killing his Christian neighbors for religion needs to step up and reclaim his religion from the wacko mullahs, lest he be justifiably counted among them.”, I’ve always thought that the “good Muslims” keep their heads down so they can keep their heads. For them to step up, they need top cover, they need allies who will mercilessly hunt down the bad Muslims who kill the good ones.
Not sure how this can happen at the personal level, that is, how we can turn this tide without a major power making it a long term policy to do such hunting. The human race is not organized enough to do this “organically”, from the grassroots level.