We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Why the Westminster Village is now worth obsessing about

The complaint now being widely voiced, referred to in passing in his recent posting about the nuclear ambitions of Iran by our own Johnathan Pearce, is that bloggers like me droning on and on about this Smeargate saga are perhaps falling into the trap of taking the contents of the “Westminster Village” (see also: “Westminster Bubble”) somewhat too seriously. There is, said JP, a world out there, as indeed there is. And blow me down if JP, just as I was finalising the links in what follows, put up yet another Smeargate-related posting here with one of those very same phrases, “Westminster Village”, right there in the title.

So, why this fascination? Why do I and so many other bloggers just now seem able to blog about little else?

Where to start? One place to start is by saying that, while this Westminster Bubble-stroke-Village indeed shouldn’t be that important, it actually is very important. The people inside it dispose of at least half our money. Arguably, given recent financial events, they are now disposing of just about all of it. They are the people who must give their attention – if they have any to spare from their smearing of each other and of anyone else whom they take against – to such things as the nuclear ambitions of Iran.

A classic tactic of our current gaggle of rulers, when they are caught out doing something wicked, is to let the complaints about whatever piece of nastiness they just did rumble on for a day or two, but then to say: okay, okay, enough. Now we must “move on”. We mustn’t be obsessed with the Westminster Village, the Westminster Bubble. For yes indeed, these very phrases make up one of the key memes that is used by our present government to protect itself from sustained scrutiny. If like me you drone on about their latest petty atrocity, this means that you are indifferent to all the other ills of the world and want those to continue and get even worse, is their line.

And indeed, if I thought that this current government was doing anything good, I might see the force of this argument. As it is, even the few vaguely good, maybe, perhaps, things that the Government is now attempting, concerning various “reforms” of the sort favoured by the likes of James Purnell, will only serve to discredit such reforms in the future, and in the meantime they will be bungled. The only thing I want this government now to do is drop dead, not just because of Smeargate, but because of, well, everything.

With far greater force, as was appropriate to a far greater evil, I felt this about the old USSR. The USSR, I believed, was smashable, and I believed this before it was actually smashed. I further believed, during the 1980s, that smashing the USSR was one of the very few big yet almost unambiguously good things that the world then was capable of administering to itself. Magic buttons in politics are rare, but here was one. The USSR, then and ever since it had begun, blighted everything. Nothing else could be effectively dealt with until it was dealt with. All the other problems (notably Islamic terrorism) were being inflamed by that one big problem, namely the apparently relentless arm-wrestling that then dominated world politics, between the USSR and the civilised world. And, to repeat, that one big problem, the continuing existence of the USSR, had one huge advantage over most other problems then or since. It was fairly easily solvable. The USSR was worth breaking because, in the word of Gordon Gecko, it was breakable. A few more well-aimed shoves and over it would crash. Accordingly, I and all other anti-Soviet elements at that time brandished whatever weapons we could find at that evil empire, threw whatever mud at it that came to hand. In my case that meant writing and publishing little pamphlets about such things as how the USSR was both worthy of being broken and breakable. (I probably contributed even more by have an unusual surname and a father, “Sir Robert” if you please, who was once upon a time in MI6. What else was I doing? Nothing as it happened. But they didn’t know that.)

In my recollection, nobody accused all us anti-Soviets at that time of being obsessed with the “Moscow Bubble”, but we were certainly accused of being obsessed with the USSR, and told that there was a world out there, full of “real problems”, and that we should stop being so monomaniacal about just the one mere government, disagreeable though it was. I agreed entirely about all those other problems, but believed that a huge step in the right direction, a huge step towards making all those other problems that little bit easier to get to grips with, would be to sweep the USSR from the board. Just smash it to rubble. I rejoiced then when that was done. I rejoice still that it was done. The post-Soviet news agenda hasn’t been a hundred per cent good, but it would take a month of blog postings to even begin to count all the ways in which the USSR’s collapse has made the world a better place.

On a far smaller scale and in a history-repeating-itself-as-farce kind of way, I now feel the same thing about the Gordon Brown government. Yes, there are a thousand problems out there that the British government and the wider British political debate ought to be addressing. Of course there are. And I will continue to try to find time and brain-space to blog about them too, just as I often wrote about other things besides the desirability of smashing the USSR during the 1980s. I would be very sorry if all other Samizdatistas were as monomaniacally fascinated by Smeargate as I now find that I am, and note with satisfaction that they are not. Nevertheless, here is a battle that both should be won and can be won. Quite soon now, it will be won. And the sooner it is won, and the more completely and dramatically and unforgettably it is won, the better. Once it is, we can all get back to arguing about all the other important stuff, without the chaos that is this present government screwing everything up, by the simple, sordid fact of its continuing existence.

So now, about that Derek Draper fellow …

6 comments to Why the Westminster Village is now worth obsessing about

  • I’m curious what you think the solution is. I can understand the appeal of removing the current government, but that just puts in a different set of people with the same desire for power that leads to backbiting of the sort we’re currently seeing. It seems, then, that you want to replace the current school of politicians with people who don’t want power. For me that’s an admirable goal, the only problem being that those people don’t want power 🙂

    This isn’t a criticism, btw – I’m genuinely curious what the solution is.

  • Johnathan Pearce

    Good post. Brian, I want to make it clear that I have not been critical of all the postings we have done on the subject. This does give us – and Paul Staines, aka Guido is one of “us” – a chance to really show how the world is changing, and to land a few well-aimed blows.

    I must admit that it has really surprised me how rapidly the fortunes of this government have imploded. I guess I should not have been surprised. Over a year ago, I remember reading Allister Heath’s The Business articles pointing out what a total, fucking disaster this lot were showing themselves to be. The truth is that the disaster has been in the making a long time. Those who wanted the evidence have had plenty of warning.

  • RAB

    It’s like watching a souffle collapse before your eyes isn’t it.
    But the trouble is, the evil venal twisted bastards are still trying to wriggle free, in the case of Green, by blaming the Civil Servants.
    Nothing to do with me gov!
    it was them pesky over zealous Mandrins!

    Well the leaks were coming from the Home Office, but it was the Cabinet Office that called Scotland Yard.
    Nobody in his right mind believes that a Manderin would call in the police to investigate an opposition MP without the full knowledge of Brown and the Thuggees.

    The DPP report is devestating. Smith should be gone by the end of the week.

  • Kevin B

    Yes the Westminster Village is worth obsessing about. As are the Washington Village, the Brussels Village, the Paris, Bonn, Madrid, Moscow,Teheran, Riyadh and all the other Villages out there.

    And the reason they worth obsessing about, the reason they are more important than all the other problems out there in the world, is that they are the main cause of all those other problems.

    As to what to do about it? Well, for me, the first thing to do is send the message that we are more than dissatisfied with our ruling elite, (and in this I include not just the politicians, but the media, civil service, academia, rent-seekers and all the other hangers-on who make a comfortable living off our labours, and who treat us with contempt for our trouble).

    In this respect, the Tea Parties are an excellent start. Those things that the likes of Sully complain most about – that they are leaderless and lack a coherent message – are their greatest strengths. They show that American citizens are highly pissed off at the shenanigans of their supposed leaders and they want to make it clear to them that their continued arrogance will not be tolerated. The media particularly will find this out. Many of those who attended the Tea Parties will have taken photos and sent them to their friends and relatives, texted their aquaintances, and talked about their experiences with their colleagues at work and their extended families at home. The contrast between these reports and the coverage by the media and the reactions of the politicians will do a great deal to open a lot more eyes to the arrogance of those institutions.

    The next step, I believe, should be to take the opportunity at the next elections to throw the bums out. Vote for whatever candidate represents ‘None of the Above’. Tell our ruling elite that they work for us, and not the other way round.

    After that, who knows? A government that believes in small central government, the rule of law and the liberty and responsibility of the individual over that of the state would be nice.

    I won’t hold my breath for that, but if we can kick out the elite, I’ll be happy.

  • Brian, I take your post to be to a certain degree about blogging and the importance of getting it out on the streets that this is a relevant field of battle. And one in which we are pwning the left.

    And you are right. That is important. As is the downfall of Brown and his absurd toadies while he chews the carpet in the Fuhrer bunker. That may be all over bar the shouting but we do have to keep on shouting. Now is the time for the big push and to keep on pushing. All of us. All of us doing our bit. However big or small that bit might be.

    There are lots of broadly libertarian blogs out there. Lots of them. I write on a small (but growing) one. Counting Cats will never change the world. But the collective of Cats and all the rest might if we keep plugging away. Not least because we encourage others. Even us little guys, if there are enough of us, can achieve great things. And currently an army of ants ants is tearing the wounded old Wildebeast of this government apart.

    I’m loving it.

    PS. An analogy: Those in the MSM who dismissed the blogosphere are now having it dawn on them they were wrong. Like grumpy old Generals who before WWI dismissed airpower must have felt when the Blitz hit London in 1940.

  • *sniff* At last someone’s said what needed to be said. It’s like Devil’s Kitchen with the soul and vocabulary of Wordsworth…