We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Fighting financial mercantilism

Reuters, last month:

LONDON, Jan 26 – British Prime Minister Gordon Brown warned on Monday against a retreat into financial protectionism as the global economic downturn gathers pace.

With sterling near record lows against the yen and 23-year lows against the dollar, Brown also reiterated that his government policy was not built around currency exchange rates.

“We have not yet seen the same protectionism in trade with beggar-thy-neighbour policies of the ’30s,” he told reporters, referring to the Great Depression. “And I will fight hard to ensure we do not. But we also need to ensure we do not exercise a new form of financial mercantilism of retreat into domestic lending and domestic financial markets.

Reuters, this month, from Berlin:

BERLIN, Feb 22 – European leaders meeting in Berlin on Sunday have backed oversight of all financial markets and products, including hedge funds, and urged that sanctions be drawn up to punish tax havens, according to a final statement seen by Reuters.

Where was Gordon? Apparently he was there. Perhaps he has changed his mind about financial mercantilism in the meantime.

4 comments to Fighting financial mercantilism

  • Not to be too harsh on Brown this is the EU so whether or not he changed his mind isn’t particularly relevant, the EU will do as it wishes. Can we really be surprised that an intrinsically protectionist organisation as the EU (built from a Customs Union don’t forget) would be in favour of protectionism?

  • Laird

    From what I know of Gordon Brown (remember, I am a provincial American), frankly I am surprised to read that he held (even if only briefly) and espoused such a rational perspective on mercantilism.

    And I think Chris Strange has it exactly right.

  • Nuke Gray!

    But what is the solution?
    If you withdraw from Europe, isn’t that the same as the problem?

  • Paul Marks

    Getting out of the E.U. (as Chris Stange, following Ropke, rightly says – even at the start a customs union not a free trade area) would not mean putting taxes (or other restrictions) on imports from individuals or companies in Germany or whereever (or having them do it to individuals and companies based here – at least no more than they do now) as WTO rules would still apply.

    As would self interest as “they sell us far more than we sell them” – so a “trade war” to “punish Britain” is not likely (we are dealing with countries where associations of companies have far more influence than they do here – for example the German government, unlike a British government, is not going to support a dispute that seriously hurt German exports).

    And getting out of the E.U. would free us from the threat of regulations that may destroy “the City” and (by the threats of the British government) the Channel Islands and Isle of Man also.

    What getting out of the E.U. would not achieve is to protect us from Mr Brown’s own activities.

    For example, today yet another 50 billion Pounds was announced (14 billion of it via Northern Rock – a enity that should have been allowed to close down a long time ago).

    This is on top of more than a TRILLION Pounds that the government and the “independent” Bank of England have already spent on bank bailouts and other “recession fighting” antics.

    This spending has smashed the financial basis of this country.