We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

A good book to start the year

This has been out a while and is now available in paperback so quite a lot of eminent historians have already gushed, justifiably, about this outstanding account of the religious turmoil that seized much of western, central and southern Europe between 1500 and 1700. Diarmaid MacCulloch, a senior Oxford academic, has written what I would chalk up as one of the best-ever accounts of this period. He is ruthlessly fair-minded and sympathetic, fighting the urge to make simplistic points (although there is a dry sense of humour throughout). He makes it clear that the Reformation should emphatically not be confused with liberalism; Luther, Calvin and Knox may have inadvertently set in train some of the moves that have led to a more individualistic society but that was not their primary purpose. And although he is justifiably scathing about the horrors of the Inquisition in Catholic Spain and elsewhere, he points out, for example, that the mania for witch-burning occured both in Protestant and Catholic lands (in my own native East Anglia, the witch-hunting obsessions of the 17th Century led to a lot of brutality, for example).

This is the sort of book I wished I could have read while reading history as an under-graduate. It goes without saying that it has relevance for our own time in figuring out what to make of Islamic fundamentalism, among other things.

3 comments to A good book to start the year

  • Tom McKendree

    If you find this topic interesting, and are also willing to play long games with fiddly rules, then an excellent game worth looking at is _Here I Stand_.

    http://www.boardgamegeek.com/game/17392

  • guy herbert

    I’d second Jonathan’s comments. It is an excellent book. If you buy the paperback, you may wish you’d bought the hardback, because it is a damn thick book and you’ll want to read it several times.

  • Johnathan Pearce

    guy, thanks. I need to read it again because the sheer number of people in it is vast and I am trying to remember them all; it also gets incredibly complex as you reach the 30 Years’ War: it appears to involve fights between lots of in-bred Hapsburgs and their Germanic cousins for much of the time.