We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Leave no one in doubt

The Conservatives have at long last committed themselves to a tax-cutting agenda:

The Conservatives plan to offer tax cuts at the next general election in a shift aimed at highlighting the divide between their policies and the tax increases introduced by Labour.

So is that settled then?

Oliver Letwin issued a statement clarifying the party’s position after earlier appearing to slam the door on a manifesto commitment to reduce the tax burden.

In an interview with the Telegraph yesterday, he surprised senior colleagues by declaring: “We will not go to the polls at the next election saying that we will reduce the tax bill.”

Er… so it’s not settled.

A spokesman for Mr Letwin said: “The Tory party has always and will always be a low tax party.

So they are going to cut taxes?

“We will not make any irresponsible promises or do anything which that put the public services or Britain’s finances at risk.”

Or, they’re not.

So that’s clear then. Or not. They want low taxes. Or they don’t. Or they do. In principle. If nobody minds too much. They have made a commitment. Or not. Well, a bit of a commitment. A qualified promise. More of an aspiration really. An idle thought. Just a suggestion. They are going to run it up the flagpole and see if the cat licks it up. But not yet. Soon. Maybe. Possibly not though. Let’s not be too hasty. The Conservatives are muddled. Well, a bit muddled. Not coherent at all. But they expect to be. Sometime. Cannot promise when. Er, what was the question? Can’t we change the subject? Good grief, is that the time? They have just remembered..er, a very important appointment. Must dash.

[My thanks to Melanie Phillips for the links.]

6 comments to Leave no one in doubt

  • Mark

    Just an innocent just-want-to-know question Mr. Samizdata: why does a Brit care about US Supreme Court decisions regarding our freedoms (important as they may be to Americans)?

  • Simon Jester

    “No, no, this is abuse. Arguments is down the corridor, third door on the left.”

  • There is no inconsistency if you say you will cut taxes and at the same time say that you “will not make any irresponsible promises or do anything which that put the public services or Britain’s finances at risk.”

    If you move the payment for much of the public services into the private sector, that wouldn’t put them at risk, for example.

  • Verity

    Simon – Ha ha ha ha ha!

  • Rob Read

    Don’t say “public services” say the “coercion funded sector of the economy” it’s far more accurate.

  • Dave O'Neill

    If you move the payment for much of the public services into the private sector, that wouldn’t put them at risk, for example.

    That depends on what you define risk as, and what services you want.