We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Miss Riding Hood? Your permit, please

The threats to liberty in Britain are too numerous to keep track of. Thanks to Josie Appleton on Spiked! for this, which I had entirely missed before now:

The Safeguarding Vulnerable Groups Bill, due to return to the House of Commons next week, will mean that 9.5million adults – one third of the adult working population – will be subject to ongoing criminal checks.

It is a House of Lords Bill, but has Government backing.

The Bill would create an Independent Barring Board (IBB), which would maintain “barred lists” preventing listed individuals from engaging in “regulated activities”. “In respect of an individual who is included in a barred list, IBB must keep other information of such description as is prescribed.” [cl.2(5)]

As the Bill was originally presented, you would have no right to damages if you were mistakenly or maliciously included in a barred list, and nor would anyone else. And the IBB would have been an absolute finder of fact, with appeal allowed only on a point of law. So among the things the IBB would have been independent of is responsibility for its actions.

Now things are slightly better, but there’s a cunning pseudo-compromise. You can sue. And you can now appeal the facts. But the criteria applied in the application of policy to an individual case – the core of what the IBB would do – is expressly (with a shade of Guantanamo) deemed not to be a matter of law or fact, and are therefore not to be subject to examination by the courts [cl.4(3)].

The schedule of “regulated activity” is 5 pages long in the printed copy. So you’ll have to look it up yourselves if you are interested.

The practical effect? Well, as an example, as I understand it, if the Bill were currently law, I would be committing a criminal offence in paying someone I trust to look after my elderly mother, who is currently convalescing from an operation, without both of us being made subject to official monitoring first.

Once it is in force, if you wish to be self sufficient – even if you don’t value your privacy, and are confident that theree’s nothing about you to which an official could possibly have objected in the past, and that you might not be confused with anyone else – you’ll need to know if a family member is going to be ill in sufficient time to fill in all the forms and wait for them to be processed. Better leave it to the state – which is of course always perfect.

8 comments to Miss Riding Hood? Your permit, please

  • Johnathan Pearce

    Jesus H. Christ.

  • Freeman

    One more piece of data to add to our ID cards.
    Whoops. . . that’s a contract modification — another billion pounds, please.

  • guy herbert

    More to the point, it is another pretext to force individuals to surrender their identities to the national identity management project.

    A monitoring certificate under a future SVG Act [an institutional freudian slip, do you think? That “Vulnerable Groups” are concerned, rather than vulnerable persons?], would undoubtably become a designated document for the purposes of the Identity Cards Act.

  • guy herbert

    Perhaps I should also have mentioned, too, that the schedule of “regulated activity” is just a start. It may be extended by regulations.

  • spruance

    For years I have played with the idea to move to GB, a beacon of liberty in the EU, from Germany. Now, since your government has surpassed ours by far in taking away civic liberties, I would not even think about it!

  • greap

    Yet another good reason I am moving to New Hampshire in a few months :) I really think we passed the point of no return in the UK a long time ago now, I am sure if I came back in 20 years the country will more resemble an Anthem type state rather then a beacon for rights & proprietary.

  • Come to Texas, spruance. We would be glad to have you — we’ve had a good history with German immigrants so far.

  • Duncan S

    This has been picked up by the Times today.

    I sat and read “The case against vetting” this morning and was left rather gobsmacked. The amount of state interference is getting worse in the UK, and I personally feel more and more powerless to counter the onslaught.