We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Discussion point: Trump’s proposed Russia-Ukraine peace deal

The Telegraph reports,

The United States has threatened to cut off weapons and intelligence to Ukraine unless it signs Donald Trump’s peace deal by next Thursday.

Sources said Ukraine was under greater pressure from Washington to bow to the US president’s demands than in previous negotiation efforts.

“They want to stop the war and want Ukraine to pay the price,” one of the sources told Reuters.

Volodymyr Zelensky said on Thursday he would use the plan as the basis for negotiations with Russia but Kyiv has warned its red lines must not be crossed in any peace deal.

The Ukrainian leader spoke to his European allies on Friday, including Sir Keir Starmer and Emmanuel Macron, who “welcomed efforts of the US” but called for a “just and lasting peace” for Ukraine.

Mr Trump’s 28-point peace plan is largely favourable to Russia, giving Moscow more Ukrainian territory than it currently possesses and readmission to the G7.

On Friday, the Kremlin maintained that it had not received Mr Trump’s peace plan but warned Mr Zelensky must negotiate “now” or risk losing more territory.

The part I have put in bold type looks alarming. On the other hand, the British press, most definitely including the Telegraph, continually tries to make Trump look as bad as possible. In the first few months after Putin invaded, Ukraine’s resolute defence against the odds saved the country from annihilation – but as the war drags on its position seems to be gradually weakening. What do you think? Is this the best deal Ukraine is likely to get?

9 comments to Discussion point: Trump’s proposed Russia-Ukraine peace deal

  • rhoda klapp

    What is the cost to Russia, or are they going to be rewarded for their aggression? Looks like a lousy deal to me. What’s to stop them coming back with a re-equipped army?

  • JJM

    If the US president gets this deal, will he be seen waving a piece of paper in the air and proclaiming “peace in our time” as he disembarks from Airforce One I wonder?

  • A bigger question is “Can Putin afford to accept these terms?”

  • JJM

    The US is once again proving to be a capricious and unreliable ally.

  • bobby b

    JJM
    November 21, 2025 at 3:54 pm

    “The US is once again proving to be a capricious and unreliable ally.”

    Very true. Y’all should look elsewhere for support. We have our own problems right now.

  • JJM

    We have our own problems right now.

    And this sort of capitulating to a third-rate country like Russia suggests you’re going to have more of them in future!

    Your last president saw fit to re-equip the Taliban.

    Why do I get the feeling that the Chinese are enjoying every moment of this?

  • Is this the best deal Ukraine is likely to get?

    That is not a “deal”, it would just be a ceasefire until Russia is ready at a time of their choosing to start again.

  • bobby b

    “And this sort of capitulating to a third-rate country like Russia suggests you’re going to have more of them in future!”

    “You idiots had better start taking care of this right effing now!”

    Yeah, let me know how this approach works out for you. 😉

  • Paul Marks.

    I have not seen the proposed agreement – and so can not usefully comment.

    Media reports are no good – one has to see the actual document.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>