We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

The Rishi Sunak Question is the wrong question

About a year ago Konstantin Kisin of Triggernometry stirred up controversy by suggesting that Rishi Sunak, former British Prime Minister, was “not English”. At the time, I tried to write something and failed miserably. The other week the controversy flared up again as Sunak, himself, belatedly commented on the affair. Once again, I tried to write something and once again I failed. I kept tying myself up in knots before coming to the conclusion that it was all a bit futile. The real question – the important question – is whether someone is pro-British or anti-British. Having said that there has to be something to be pro or anti, which implies the existence of Britishness. So what is this Britishness? It is largely ethnic but not entirely. People can join and they can leave.

So, going back to the original question, where does Rishi Sunak fit on this British/pro-British/anti-British spectrum? Well, he’s not British and given his actions in office it is difficult to tell whether he is pro or anti. Next question: what about Keir Starmer?

P.S. I wrote this before watching Kisin’s most recent monologue. Which was a mistake because he does a much better job of explaining the situation before suggesting the obvious solution: re-establish the British Empire.

2 comments to The Rishi Sunak Question is the wrong question

  • Philip Scott Thomas

    This post is a good example of one of the difficulties in the example. It starts out talking about Englishness and ends with Britishness. The two are not the same, but it’s easy to slip back and forth between them.

    Britishness is easy. It has a legal definition; if one is a British citizen one is British. It’s Englishness that’s difficult. And a large part of that difficulty comes down to whether one is willing, as Kisin is, to include race in the description. That’s the real sticking place: is being white part of being English or not?

  • Discovered Joys

    You could reasonably argue that the British Empire was a collective idea that had a greater meaning beyond geography and commerce. Apart from some legal consequences the original idea has faded.

    And sadly you might also argue that the idea of Englishness has also faded. Still strong in the countryside (and hated by some) but almost completely vanished in the towns.

    I don’t think it serves any purpose to try and resurrect those ideas, although I hope a new collective idea will emerge – and it’s not the sycophantic submission to the EU.

Leave a Reply

You can use these HTML tags

<a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>