Starmer’s commitment to universal human rights – which necessarily implies open borders – is now a threat to national security and, paradoxically, the human rights of the British people. By welcoming el-Fattah, a virulent anti-Semite, Starmer has violated the right of our Jewish community to feel secure in their own land. His refusal to police the pro-Palestinian, anti-Semitic hate marchers since October 2023 has also trampled on the security of British Jews and infringed upon their liberty – Central London has become a no-go zone.
|
|||||
|
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil Liberties
Commentary
EconomicsPolitics |
Samizdata quote of the day – Starmer poses a threat to the Human Rights of the British PeopleDecember 30th, 2025 |
 4 comments to Samizdata quote of the day – Starmer poses a threat to the Human Rights of the British PeopleLeave a Reply |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons   |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
|||||
Does the current british regime consider the british people to have human rights compared to say members of the Ummah? Where are their priorities?
I don’t believe the government (Tory or Labour), civil service or media were ignorant of el-Fattah’s previous social media because the EU parliament had previously withdrawn him from consideration from a prize in 2014 after they were revealed. Perhaps our entire political and media class are actually stupider than the EU parliament,but I doubt it. They can dig up the social media of very obscure Reform or Corbynite council candidates to ruin them but we are expected to believe no one bothered with this chap. I do wonder if the man is some sort of intelligence asset related to Arab spring and the full story is not being told.
I am intrigued that both the Guardian and BBC have now printed some of the anti-white tweets el-Fattah made. Not the most violent ones, but I find it interesting what was printed as in similar cases in the past the press have almost always been very coy about exposing the anti-white sentiments from social media loudmouths.
Politicians get whatever briefing the civil service sees fit to give them. They do no research of their own. So we can fairly assume that the civil service wanted Fattah to be made a British citizen. Why? I don’t know, I just get the impression they hate us and wish us dead.
If you are a globalist, then the very phrase “the British people” includes not only the “heritage groups”, but the newly received, as well as any and all people that might come in the future.
So Starmer is being true to his beliefs.
His philosophy will never be one that can be argued away from anyone, in that case. The underlying propositions are entirely contradictory.