Must say this made me laugh (in a good way)…
|
|||||
|
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil Liberties
Commentary
Economics |
Careful what you click on…October 28th, 2025 |
 4 comments to Careful what you click on…Leave a Reply |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons   |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
|||||
I wasn’t familiar with Candice Owen but I did wonder what happened to Tucker Carlson. He seemed a sensible chap for many years but is obviously mad as a box of frogs.
Perhaps my failure to engage with mainstream pundits, award ceremonies, approved broadcasters, celebrities and ‘influencers’ is not received as a silent message of contempt? So… it’s all my fault for slack gatekeeping?
Everything he said can also be applied to voting.
What you reward with your votes is what you create more of in the world.
We get the media that we choose to watch, and we get the government for which we choose to vote.
And yet (or, and so), here we are.
@Old Jack Tar
obviously mad as a box of frogs.
Are they mad as in crazy or mad as in angry? And why is a box of frogs mad? I mean are they mad because they are in the box, or are frogs just intrinsically mad and the madness is compounded by there being a bunch all in one single place?