Remember, when the grooming gangs hit the news again in January, after decades of these gangs operating, the official line from No10, repeated by the regime media, remained that ‘the real story here is the tech oligarchs spreading disinformation and the spread of the Islamophobic far right’.
They briefed fake news to the media that ‘Cummings is writing Elon’s tweets’. The PM gave a speech about it. Useless regime hacks like Lewis Goodall called it ‘his best speech’. Goodall explained that the ‘real story’ is the influence of Elon, social media radicalising the right, ‘the emergence of a common UK/US online right … making extremist, until recently fringe politics mainstream in British conservatism… Far right thinking … has become mainstream. Remember that the notion of ubiquitous Muslim grooming gangs has long been a trope of extremism, despite little evidence’ — and the idea that there’s been a national conspiracy to deny victims justice ‘is dangerous nonsense’ (Goodall, Jan 2025).
This was ‘the mainstream’ pundit view in SW1-media-land only 6 months ago. Being pathological and pathologically incompetent, the regime then tried to organise another layer of coverup with a report but this went wrong because the scale of evidence is so vast the author rebelled and told enough of the truth to make the No10 line untenable. Narrative Whiplash kicked in: suddenly the gangs were no longer ‘far right disinformation’, they’re real, there’ll be an Inquiry, though of course the core Insider belief hasn’t changed — the purpose of the Inquiry (from Whitehall’s perspective) is to control the story and suppress as much as possible voters connecting the collapse of border control and the systematic rape/abuse/killing of English children.
I thought you didn’t like Cummings
I do not like him at all. But just because he is an arse does not mean everything he says is wrong. He has seen the blob from the inside and often has interesting insights even if he was an utter covid-fascist amongst other flaws.
Perry – you sum up what I also think about Mr “lockdown” Cummings.
As for the United Kingdom generally….
Things continue to get worse here – the World Health Organisation Pandemic Treaty (rightly rejected by the United States) has been accepted by the British government (the deadline for rejecting the amendments was the 19th of July) so no need for Mr Cummings for the next lockdown. And the Online Safety Bill (Act) is now in force.
Talk of this being a free country is now nonsense.
Will the regime fall?
Yes it will – but not till May 2029 (perhaps a month or so later – if they choose to carry on even after the local elections, till the full five years is up).
But the country will be utterly wreaked by then.
Even as late as the, much smeared (lied about), 1930s, the United Kingdom was still better governed (or less badly governed) than most other Western nations.
Later, from the Atlee government onwards (yesterday was the 80th anniversary of that government coming into office) the United Kingdom became an example of a government worse than most other Western governments (although the demented “educated” classes pretended the opposite). In the 1950s and early 1960s there was a partial correction in the United Kingdom – but in the late 1960s and 1970s British government became dramatically worse. This was partly (only partly) corrected by Margaret Thatcher – up to 1990.
Things have gone badly since 1990 – but will now get much worse, very much worse.
The main function the United Kingdom will serve over the next four years will be as an example of bad, indeed terrible, governance.
If “right wingers” in other nations (including the United States) have any intelligence they will use the line “Do you want to end up like Britain?” to help them win elections.
Being a bad, indeed terrible, example of governance – is still serving a role, and this is the role the United Kingdom will serve, it will serve as a warning of the terrible consequences of leftist (what Americans, bizarrely, call “liberal”) policies.
As for the rape and other abuse of British children.
President Trump warned yesterday of the terrible consequences of mass immigration into Western Europe.
His warning was true – but sadly, partly, out of date.
Now natural increase (births) has partly taken over from immigration, as various people (for example the late John Enoch Powell) warned it eventually would.
Even if all migration into the United Kingdom stopped right now, ethnic conflict would continue to get worse and worse.
“Demography is destiny” – as the French used to say, before the regime there started to punish people for saying such things.
Mr Cummings mentions that 200 years ago the British government was much better than other governments at procurement (of military equipment and so on).
Part of the reason for that was that the British economy was vastly stronger than any other county – with the possible exception of the United States. Due to the relative (relative – compared to other nations) lack of statism in Britain.
But Mr Cummings is correct that British government was also different then – there was no Civil Service then, ministers and the Prime Minister hired and fired their own staff – and personally managed government.
And such Prime Ministers as Lord Liverpool and Sir Robert Peel were rather efficient managers.
The rot set in with Prime Minister Russell – and his faith in officials, ideas being pushed by Sir Charles Trevelyan – who was promoted (yes promoted – and honoured) after every disaster he was responsible for – his record in Ireland being the worst. He was true driving force behind the creation of the bureaucracy.
However, (see above) I would still argue that Britain was better governed, or less badly governed, than other nations – even as late as the 1930s.
My gut tells me this shower of shit in office won’t make it to 2029.
Y’all are being gaslit in the extreme, while they build up vote numbers through population-replacement and change laws to prohibit speaking about it.
If this isn’t pushed back soon, you probably don’t need to worry about 2029. You will have no chance to recover. It will be illegal to recover.
Johnathan Pearce – why should Turkeys vote for Christmas?
There need be no election before the middle of 2029 – so why should Labour Members of Parliament approve an election which would see these boys and girls having to look for other work?
And might see “Reactionaries” come to power. As Professor Harold Laski (Chairman of the Labour Party in the 1940s – and a very distinguished academic and intellectual) argued – anything, anything at all (censorship, rigging elections – anything) is justified to prevent “Reactionaries” coming to power (American “Democrats” agree with this – they hate and fear democracy, precisely because of the danger of “Reactionaries” coming into office, and then, perhaps, insisting on coming into power as well as office) – Conservatives should only be “allowed” to be in office if they agree on basic “Policy”.
And Professor Pigou (Cambridge) argued that people should not be allowed to argue for lower taxes and government spending – below the “scientifically correct” level (Professor Pigou is presented as a free market type in the “General Theory….” by Lord Keynes – this is an “in-joke” in the book – as anyone who knew Professor Pigou would know that it was the opposite of the truth).
And the British population, being unarmed and increasingly sat-upon, can not force the elected government out of office – or the unelected government out of power.
bobby b – the laws are already in force, including the “On Line Safety Act” (which came into force a couple of days ago) – I commit “crimes” under these laws every day (I post under my own name – and I am a United Kingdom resident) – I will go to prison, it is only a matter of when.
As for the new population. Yes you are correct, that was the plan – to import lots of people (with promises of XYZ public services and benefits) who would vote Labour – as would their children, and children’s children (the Conservatives went along with this plan – out of weakness, or stupidity, or something worse).
But the plan is going wrong – Sir Keir Starmer and others are to sort-of grasp, in their dim way, that the new populations do not like them – indeed would like to rob and destroy Sir Keir and the others.
Sir Keir and the others will not change their policy of “Diversity and Inclusion” (these words really mean replacement and exclusion) even though they are now starting to understand that it will lead to their own destruction – and the destruction of their own families. It is “the law” you see – and to change the law would be against “Policy”.
I think they, Sir Keir and the others, know that the demographic transformation will destroy them, themselves, and their families – but (please understand – and perhaps have pity) their entire lives, from childhood, have been devoted to this philosophy – it would be incredibly difficult for them to change now, especially as if an individual (say Sir Keir) changed – the others around him would turn on him.
Yes they are going along with a terrible policy which will destroy the British people (and they should be condemned for that) – but they and their families will also, in the end, be victims.
It is all very unfortunate.
British governance, indeed the governance of much of the Western world, has become (in effect) a Death Cult.
Is the United States really that different? For example, look at who the candidates of the Democrat Party are for Mayor of New York City and Mayor of Minneapolis. These candidates make no secret of their passionate hatred of American principles, and their communities (both immigrants and the descendants of the immigrants of these groups) share their hatred of American principles – their hatred of America (as can be seen by who they send to Congress – and in many other ways).
In my lifetime the only President who has given a damn about Americans not being replaced is Donald John Trump (and he may fail in the end, and be the “Sitting Bull” or “Crazy Horse” of his people – great tactical victories, but, in the end, defeat). The last President to care about these matters before DJT was President Eisenhower back in the 1950s (the rather unfortunately named “Operation Wetback” and so on).
Things change fast….
For example the first shots of the American Revolution were in Lexington (Mass) in 1775 – and at the start of the 1980s (under President Reagan) the town of Lexington was much the same ethnically, as it had been when it was founded in the 1600s and during the “Battle of Lexington” in 1775.
Now, 2025, the town is mostly Chinese (including in the schools) – I am sure they are charming people, but it is a rather dramatic change, and what do such things as Solomon Brown firing the first shot of the American Revolution mean to them? Perhaps they mean a lot – perhaps they are passionately against “Gun Control” and believe that the rights of the individual should take precedence over the “interests of the community”.
I do-not-know – so let us hope so.
By the way….
For people who do not grasp how a hard drinking and short tempered man become a “man of God” prepared to lay down his life in defence of others (the sort of man who “may not live well – but they die well”), there is a underrated fantasy film that may help you understand.
Watching fantasy film “Solomon Kane” (originally a character created by the Texan writer Robert E. Howard in the 1920s) may help you understand real life men such as Solomon Brown of 1775, or his claimed ancestor Robert Browne (people were careless of spelling in those days – rather like me) in the early 1600s.
Robert Browne came from a wealthy and cultured background (here in Northamptonshire) – but he became convinced that the congregation should choose their own ministers of religion (although someone could be hanged for expressing such an opinion in his time) – he also had a short temper (a strange mixture of kindness and anger) – he died in prison.
Most of the people on the Mayflower were “Brownists”.
At some point Trump or Vance will grant special status to incentivize ethnically European immigration.
You heard it here first.
It may be done via a conservative version of USAID.
Is the United States really that different?
It is vastly different. See, e.g., https://amgreatness.com/2025/07/27/historys-hard-lessons-and-americas-new-resolve/
There are so many odd things that lead to the interpretation that the destruction United Kingdom is intentional – planned, although perhaps not by any elected person.
For example, we are told we need foreign nurses (ever more of them) – yet although nursing has been made a “graduate only” profession (which is very odd in itself – as nursing used to be open to any young women who was caring and hard working) there are many, very many, British people (men as well as women now) who graduate as nurses – but they are NOT employed.
The British people who have graduated as nurses are left on the dole (“they are the wrong grade”) and foreign nurses are employed instead.
Hard to see all this as just incompetence by the regime.
Hat tip to Mr Simon Webb (“History Debunked” YouTube – although this channel will soon be closed down) for this example – there are many other examples.
the town is mostly Chinese (including in the schools) – I am sure they are charming people,
O/T I have just returned from a day trip to Windsor where I was surprised at the behaviour of several large groups of Chinese tourists.
Not at all charming, rather they were noisy, litter-dropping, pavement-hogging, queue-jumpers. While not actively trashing shops they showed zero inclination to put items back where they belonged. When half-consumed items of food or drink were no longer wanted they were simply dropped or left anywhere other than in a bin. A most unlikeable bunch.
Windsor, Canada?
It’s okay for them to act that way there. They own Canada.
Paul,
WRT the Online “Safety” Act get a VPN. If it’s a bit techie ask people.
@NickM
WRT the Online “Safety” Act get a VPN. If it’s a bit techie ask people.
Until they don’t let you.
Budge Hinman – thank you.
NickM – I had a VPN years ago, I do not bother these days.