First, that as the Casey report acknowledges, the crimes really are mostly committed by ethnic minority men, mostly Pakistani, against white-majority children. And Labour are, far more than any other party, the standard-bearers for “diversity”. On this front, Helen Lewis spelled out the problem with commendable clarity earlier this year: no one on the Left wants a “national conversation” about the rape gangs — because so many of the possible solutions are, from this perspective, prima facie unacceptable:
“Would it include calls for the mass deportation of migrants, as many on Europe’s emergent Right want? […] Should Britain enact a “Muslim ban” or reject asylum seekers from Muslim-majority countries? When liberals are still queasy about engaging with this topic, it’s because they sense that these shadow arguments lie just out of sight.”
And second, it’s not just about race relations. It’s also about the public sector, of which Labour has long presented itself as a champion. And the extent of institutional complicity, already clear, is reiterated in Casey’s report: they all knew.
The police, especially, knew. Victims were blamed, or even arrested: in one notorious incident, a father arrived outside the house in which his own daughter was being raped, called the police, and was then himself arrested. In other incidents, girls would press charges only to be immediately contacted by their rapists with threats: events strongly suggestive of police corruption. One officer in Rotherham told a desperate father that the town “would erupt” if the crimes were exposed; another, according to the 2014 Jay report, admitted these atrocities have been ongoing for 30 years but “with it being Asians, we can’t afford for this to be coming out”.
Care homes also knew. One Bradford girl reported all the way back in 2014 that the home where she ought to have found safety and respite didn’t just look the other way — when the men who raped and sold her arrived outside the home, the staff would tell her to “go out and see them”. Councils knew, too: Birmingham was suppressing reports into looked-after children being raped and trafficked 30 years ago. In Oldham, the notorious leader of one rape gang was appointed “Welfare Officer” after a girl had already come forward with allegations against him. How many teachers knew? If Dominic Cummings is to be believed, the Department of Education knew.
Read the whole thing. Nothing less than a counter-revolution will fix this.
“Nothing less than a counter-revolution will fix this.”
Yet certain folks here wouldn’t countenance Tommy Robinson, let alone defend him. Yes, I know, he’s not your kind.
You refined types aren’t ready for a counter-revolution.
Henry Cybulski it was not just “Tommy Robinson” – it was also Mark Steyn who does NOT have a “working class” accent (the real reason that a lot of people dislike T.R. – the man could just read out a railway timetable and a lot of English people would still hate him, because of the sound-of-his-voice) – GB News betrayed Mark Steyn, to please the establishment leftists of “Ofcom”, and now pretends he did not exist and that the matter of the Rape Gangs was discovered by a young man by the name of Peters.
Mr Peters does not discuss Islam, the Koran, the Hadiths, and 14 centuries of history, and neither will the “Inquiry”.
Very much like the Covid “Inquiry” (GB News also betrayed Mark Steyn over his exposure of the harm done by the so called Covid “vaccine” injections – and Richard Tice of Reform was also involved in this mess) the Rape Gangs “Inquiry” will be an elaborate exercise in missing-the-point.
Nothing, useful, will be done – after all even the Reform Party holds that demographic change is inevitable (Mr Farage has said so – he understands that immigration is NOT now the issue, that the issue is natural increase – but he holds that nothing can be done about demographic change caused by natural increase), and that there is nothing wrong with Islam – apart from some people “misinterpreting” Islam, or “twisting” it.
So that is that – Britain and some other Western nations, are, eventually, going to go. Just as some other Christian lands went centuries ago.
It must be stressed that the actions of the Rape Gangs would not have been a surprise to, say, John Bright, Gladstone or Winston Churchill.
But people who discuss a certain faith in the way that these men did, would now be sent to prison in the United Kingdom.
So one must not be too harsh on Nigel Farage and the others – they do not want to be treated as Stephen Yaxley-Lennon, “Tommy Robinson”, and others have been – either openly sent to prison for what they have said about Islam or “stitched up” (by our wonderful legal system) for some other offense, “mortgage fraud” or “contempt of court”, with everyone knowing the real reason they are being sent to prison is their opinions.
Is it really worth having your life ruined, and the lives of your family ruined, for a lost cause? And Britain, and some other Western nations, does appear to be a lost cause.
Yes, he’s not my kind, because even though I agree with him on somethings, I don’t on others. I am willing to admit I fell for some misinformation about him & I do think he is a political prisoner, but some of the reasons I distrust him were nevertheless rooted in fact.
The British National Party were highlighting grooming gangs in places like Rochdale over 20 years ago, long before Tommy Robinson became a notable figure. IIRC, the fact that they were doing this was one of the main reasons the other parties and the police and media were overall keen to downplay or ignore the issue because it was seen as far more important to not let the BNP prosper even if some working class white women had to be thrown to the wolves.
An exception was the Labour Keighley MP Ann Carter, who as this 2002 article shows was willing to condemn the criminal behaviour of Asian gangs in her area.
Bring it on. Although ceasing to pay for migrants would get rid of them as easily as deportation. Leave the ECHR and pass a law stating that arriving illegally or overstaying a visa means immediate deportation. Instead of a Muslim ban, we could ban new mosques, cousin marriage, chain migration, the burkha and calling for the slaughter of Jews*. And rigorously investigate and punish electoral fraud and council corruption. That would do the trick.
However, as a first move, I’d like to see a number of coppers, care home workers and civil servants hanged. Probably best to do a few hundred top immigration lawyers too.
*some people claim this is already illegal, but I have seen no evidence to support that view.
Exactly so. Enacting some enabling laws that make the welfare state very discriminatory (in the good sense of the word) would work wonders & result in widespread self-remigration. What’s not to like?
Paul Marks, funny you should bring up Mark Steyn.
From a mini-spiel put out today by the “niche Canadian”:
“After those two brave, articulate women up on stage finished telling their stories of almost surreal depravity, Steyn’s audience – Aussies, Kiwis, Canadians, Americans, Brits – sat in horrified silence. Not quite silence; a lot of people were crying. A question hung in the incredulous air. How could the UK have allowed such monstrosities to happen to its kids and then allow it to be covered up for years until victims-turned-campaigners, like the two Samanthas, fought tooth and nail to bring it to public attention?
Clearly, that’s what was bothering the American. He was desperate to understand why British men had not protected their girls.”
Indeed, where are those British men who should have been protecting their girls? Waiting for a counter-revolution that probably won’t happen?
Perry de Havilland, I’d love to hear what those rooted facts are re Tommy Robinson.
I guess all that vetting and ‘safeguarding’ and Criminal Background Checks before having anything to do with children really worked, eh?
A classic case if looking for the lost car keys under the street light, but, hey, at least we Did Something, right?
llater,
llamas
Why not beheadings? That way, their heads can be put on pikes all along Whitehall; with the overflow on Parliament Square.
Pour décourager les autres.
There’s this article.
I think TR, like Nick Griffin, have been vindicated regarding grooming gangs. OTOH, it is quite clear both have serious flaws and probably unwise to throw large amounts of support and resources their way.
Exactly my view.
I don’t begrudge voters who voted for the BNP in the 2000s though. They usually did well in working class areas that New Labour took for granted and had lost interest in, and the Tories and Lib Dems showed barely any interest in them. I know I regret the multiple times I voted for the Tories between 2004 and 2019, knowing they were shit (‘but best of all the shit options’) and still doing it despite them just getting worse and worse.
CHenry Cybulski
Firstly, because the Pakistanis targeted “vulnerable” girls, i.e. girls without fathers. Secondly because the Pakistanis had the protection of the state, so the men would be fighting the state, never a winning proposition. Thirdly the assaults happened in the heart of Muslim ghettos so you would need an army, and finally because it’s potentially a suicide mission. The state can send them to a Muslim controlled prison to be murdered.
The despicable lack of public outrage didn’t help their case either. Add to that the odour of class war, these were largely the children of “untouchables”.
Does seem one reason (in addition to fears of lawsuits) the elite and police did nothing about Jimmy Savile while he was alive despite knowing what he was up to: he mostly preyed on the vulnerable,ill and poor.
Martin – regarding Jimmy Savile, apart from his victims mostly being from the underclasses, he was also very careful to operate within State entities which, at that time, had virtually religious status in the UK – the NHS and the BBC. He knew that their default response to scandal and charges of impropriety would always, always be to deny and cover up, and the authorities would always, always defer to them – and he was right.
llater,
llamas
I have read a little about this whole situation, and I have limited how much I read about it since it is so horrible and there is literally nothing I can do about it. But from what I hear a fairly large number of people have gone to jail for their actions and there are a lot of prosecutions ongoing. Maybe the prison sentences are inadequate — I mean what sentence is adequate for what some of these men, and god help us, women did? But at least that is something.
What I don’t see, and what I think in a sense is more important, is anyone in authority suffering any consequences for this. And there seemed to be a LOT of people who draw a government salary who should at least be looking for new work, if not facing jailtime. Terrible things happen all the time because there are a small percentage of the population who are psychopaths. But when we create systems to capture these people and they fail to do so in the most egregious way there needs to be some serious consequences.
I think perhaps the most terrifying thing of all is that if the same thing happened today, I doubt the police and childcare agencies would do much different. In fact exactly the same thing could be going on in Bristol or Blackpool or Ipswich or Hull or some other city right now, and I’m not convinced we’d know about it, or if the police would do anything differently.
I’m fairly certain that the true believers in multiculturalism within that government view the rapists as just another culture of the world, as valid and meritorious as any other, and so understandable in its actions, and also view the raped girls as poor white trash and thus unworthy of concern.
But now, even they can see the trend of world opinion and judgment, and so they will be closing ranks and hiding their friends from consequence on account of their understandable and laudatory attempts to quash this evil racist anti-POC impulse.
No bureaucrat minds will be changed, but marketing techniques will be adjusted.
It appears this is about more than just sexual exploitation. The families involved are akin to the mafia. These families are criminals with drug dealing and other activity.They are mostly from a distinct area. I’d say police and politicians might be corrupted by them.
– The Book of the Merits of the Companions, Chapter: The Virtues Of ‘Aishah, The Mother Of The Believers (RA)
That’s not an old myth. It forms the basis of Islamic Jurisprudence in the UK now.
Aisha was betrothed to Muhammed at the age of 6. The “marriage” was consumated when she was 9. She is a key figure in the history of Islam and the above quotes (there is one in the link) are key parts of Islamic teaching. Peadophilia is baked into Islam. The real disgrace is that this cannot be openly said because it would be racist or something even though it is openly proclaimed by Islamic scripture which also holds that the example of the behaviour of Muhammed is to be emulated because he is, of course, the most perfect human who ever lived.
I don’t blame the true believers in Islam as much as the non-Muslims who would have me arrested for openly stating what is actually in core Islamic texts.
Stuart,
Yes, but also are they gonna do a bust on the Pakia if it will cause a riot or they’ll get sacked for “profiling”? Who is almost certainly complicit in this “white slavery” are the females in the community. It means their young men can get their rocks off without any dishonour being brought to the families. The non-Muslim girls are merely “uncovered flesh” and “war booty”. That is also baked into Islam.
I’m not saying all Muslims are evil but all good Muslims are.
Martin, Perry de Havilland, I read the Pimlico Journal article. I didn’t find it particularly convincing, especially when it included the following willfull blindness idiocy:
“On many occasions, he has asserted that the problem is not immigration per se. Rather, the problem is Islam itself….”
“This is ridiculous. While such a focus on ‘Islam’ (in practice meaning ‘Pakistanis’) may make sense from the narrow perspective of northern mill towns, inner Birmingham, or a place like Luton or Slough; or perhaps might make sense if you are focused on the threat posed by Islamic terrorism (something that has visibly receded from its mid-’10s peak), it is now outdated at best, and irrelevant at worst.”
“There is little evidence that the dysfunction of these communities is due to Islam (indeed, it may even be the opposite)….”
All the institutions that were supposed to uphold the law and protect the vulnerable didn’t just fail to do so, they actively refused to. They willingly condemned thousands of girls to years of unspeakable horror, through some vile mixture of cowardice, expediency, and ideology. They lied shamelessly, they smeared anybody who tried to raise the alarm as “racist”, and then they did everything in their power to bury the whole issue. After such a monstrous betrayal, why would anybody ever trust them again? That’s why it’s not just a scandal, it is a crisis of legitimacy for the British state.
“read the whole thing”
I have – and Mary Harrington is quite correct that the people in the government institutions, including the police, knew about the Rape Gangs – and actively covered up the rape and abuse of women and girls.
However, Mary Harrington does not discuss Islam, the Koran, the Hadiths, and 14 centuries of history and practice in relation to infidel women – whom the right hand takes.
Neither will the “inquiry” (it will not inquire into these matters) – nothing useful will be done.
I do NOT say that all Western nations are going to fall – after all some Western nations have governments that have realistic opinions. Hungary springs to mind – where John O’Sullivan runs the Danube Institute, although Hungary is in the European Union – and will have to make the choice of either leaving the European Union or crushing the truth as “Hate Speech” as required by the censorship doctrines of the European Union and the “International Community” generally – it must be understood that a nation can not be a member of the European Union and have Freedom of Speech (the E.U. forbids this under the Hate Speech doctrine) – and the International Community holds to the same doctrine – so all international organisations, government and corporate, push this anti “Hate Speech” doctrine – and NOT just in relation to Islam (in relation to many matters).
Truth or being part of the International Community – that is the choice, and it is a choice that will have to be made by all nations.
But the United Kingdom? It is hard to see any hope for this nation. The United Kingdom does not require the pressure of the International Community to proceed on the path of censorship and self-destruction – as its own establishment is dedicated to these principles.
Specifically on mass immigration – in 1968 John Enoch Powell made a speech begging for an end to it (a speech where he, perhaps unwisely, quoted from letters that had been sent to him – which his enemies, dishonestly, pretended were his own words) this stance was supported by the vast majority of the British people.
“And so, Britain being a democracy, policy was changed and mass immigration was ended” – errr NO.
What happened was that Mr Powell was sacked from the Opposition front bench the next day (by Edward Heath), and the policy of mass immigration continued.
So did the policy of a war on Freedom of Speech – which started with the, seemingly mild, 1965 Act, and was continued by many other Acts of Parliament – such as the 1968 Act, and ending with the Equality Act of 2010.
To be fair to Marry Harrington and others (even Mr Peters on GB News) an honest discussion of the Rape Gangs in Britain in relation to their theological origins, is probably unlawful in the United Kingdom.
It is easy (too easy) for someone with nothing to lose to urge people to risk losing their jobs, having their families ruined, and being sent to prison.
Well at least the last Queen made some politically-neutral but pointed comments about the scandal, didn’t she, sometime.
Commentary is more effective if it focuses more narrowly. You often criticise people for not writing the articles you want them to write.
Considering how mental net immigration has become into Britain, especially since Boris Johnson became PM and Britain left the EU, it would be ‘wilful blindness idiocy’ to think the issue is just with Islam, as that net immigration is coming from a number of countries with different cultures and religions, not just Islam, and it would be ridiculous to think the problems with such high net immigration are just coming from the Muslim ones (even if they do cause significant problems). If net immigration of 500k to 1 million was all Indian Hindhus or Ukrainians, it would still cause massive problems in Britain even if none of them were Muslims. The only net immigration of that level I’d be comfortable with is if they were all people of British and Irish descent from places like Canada, Gibraltar, white South Africans, Australians etc as they are tied by blood to us. But it’s obvious that such folk are a tiny proportion of the Boriswave and it’s continuation.
So yeh the problem is now with immigration per se. If TR doesn’t see that, well he’s behind the times.
Martin, the initial post and resulting commentary is about Pakistani rape gangs, i.e. muslim rape gangs, not about any other groups of immigrants.
You’re just trying to divert attention from the basic issue. Talk about willful blindness.
Er, you brought it up regarding the article about Tommy Robinson. And you’re the one who brought up Tommy Robinson in this thread anyway along with your pseudo-macho posturing (‘You refined types aren’t ready for a counter-revolution.’)
Given that above I give credit to the BNP and Labour MP Ann Cryer for highlighting grooming gangs back in the early 2000s,long before Tommy had done anything, I don’t think I’m distracting attention from grooming gangs at all.
Martin, you’re diverting attention from Islam and the consequences of mass Muslim immigration into your benighted land by referencing all immigration as somehow the main issue.
Henry,
I agree. The diffence I have personally observed in this “benighted land” is that immigrants from many countries actually like England and English stuff and that is, generally, why they are here. The same doesn’t apply to most Muslim migrants who kinda bring Karachi along with them to an extent you wonder why they bothered. If you go to places like Bolton or Tower Hamlets it is abundently clear. This is not enriching our cultural melody with new and interesting themes* but shouting over it. There is a difference. And this is not me being racist or Euro-America-philic because amongst the former group I can think of people I know well from Russia, China, Japan, Nigeria, Malaysia and the Philipines without even thinking about it.
Many Muslims immigrants seem actively hostile to – dar I say it? – Civilization itself.
*Or in the case of the Poles: new and interesting pickles.
Perry – yes I can. Especially when they miss the point.
Although I went on to admit that Marry Harrington may have a lot to lose, job, home, family, and so on – we all know what happened to Katie Hopkins, once famous now a “non person”.
It may well be that Mary Harrington wrote the article she could write – without risking everything.
As for the British establishment, local and national, “Act Utilitarianism” MIGHT hold that the pleasure of the rapists outweighed the pain of the victim (it all depends how Mr Bentham’s calculation comes out – especially if there are lots of rapists), and “Rule Utilitarianism” MIGHT hold that “community cohesion” – the goal of “diversity and inclusion” is more important the agony of a few hundred (or a few thousand) girls.
There is nothing in the teachings of Mr Hobbes, Mr Hume and Mr Bentham, to encourage individuals to lay down their lives for justice for an individual soul (which Mr Hobbes, Mr Hume and Mr Bentham held did-not-exist – even in the non religious Aristotelian sense) – to die for justice for an individual is not in their teachings.
There is nothing in what the British establishment are taught that argues for justice – in the traditional sense of that word (Mr Hobbes loved redefining words – emptying such words as “justice” and “law” of all moral content and making them simply the whims of the state).
“Social Justice” is what they, including the police with their new training over the last few decades, are taught – and “Social Justice” is the enemy of justice.
Mr Ed – sadly the late Queen was silent, most likely the late Queen did not know.
But that is better than the present Monarch – who made his position distressingly clear in his Christmas broadcast of 2024.
I hope, profoundly hope, that His Majesty did not write this address – and did not understand its implications.
To say something profoundly wrong in the “heat of the moment”, say the summer of 2024 when a massive wave of establishment lies was in full swing, is one thing. Perhaps (perhaps) dismissing the British people (the traditional inhabitants of this island) as a few extremists, and saying that the “whole community” (whatever that is supposed to mean) had come together to, rightly, crush them – would (perhaps) have been acceptable in the summer of 2024 – when various government agencies were hard at work (using the media, including supposedly conservative newspapers, as their puppets) pushing agitprop.
But to say, in a formal address to the nation, something that is profoundly wrong (factually wrong and morally wrong) MONTHS LATER, after people have been sent to prison (for years) for such “crimes” as walking past a disorder (but only if it is a “right wing” disorder – leftist rioters were not sent to prison) or venting on social media (but, again, only if it is “right wing” venting), is a very different thing.
Again I hope the Gentleman did not write this address – and did not understand its implications.
As for establishment claims that Britain is a “country of immigrants” or was “built by immigrants” – these are absurd lies.
Up to only a few decades ago foreigners were rare in this land.
Konstantin Kisin (a Russian Jew) recently made a video showing that the establishment claims were lies – indeed utterly absurd lies.
And I can confirm this – for example at my school there was one boy of foreign stock, I know this because it was ME.
I have a bit of English ancestry – but I am mainly Jewish (the same sort of Jewish that Mr Kisin and Mr Zelensky is – although the later identifies as a Ukrainian, putting on translation headphones when Russian is spoken, even though it is his native language) and Irish.
The Irish, Catholic and Protestant (for Ulster Protestants are ethically Irish – even the ones whose ancestors came from Scotland, as the Scots were an Irish tribe) have their own problem with the agenda of the International Community.
How long before the Irish are declared to have “never really existed”?
It is not just the English who are being targeted for elimination – it is all historic nations (peoples).
For the International Community hates and fears historic nations – it fears that it can not rule them, as they have other loyalties than Technocratic world governance.
Therefore it holds, and has long held, that historic nations (peoples – ethnic nations) must be eliminated.
And, before anyone points it out, Zionism is, of course, a form of ethnic nationalism – to rule absolutely, the International Community must destroy Israel, just as it must destroy all other ethnic-nations (peoples).
In theory the International Community does not hate Israel, or England, more than it hates, say, Denmark.
It (the international government and corporate establishment) hates all nations.
Nations are “in the way” – so they must die.
“Diversity” means uniformity, “Inclusion” means exclusion, “Tolerance” means intolerance, indeed vicious persecution.
Learn the language of the International Community, of the government and corporate international establishment.
I quote from here:
Total sexual offence convictions
There were a total of 7,874 sexual offence convictions in 2024 of which there were 1,118 known foreign national convictions and a further 614 with an “unknown” nationality. This would mean that foreign nationals accounted for between 15% and 22% of sexual offence convictions in 2024 (depending on the classification of those “unknown” convictions).
The worst offending nationalities, in raw numbers are:
India 100
Romania 92
Poland 83
Pakistan 55
Afghanistan 43
Nigeria 40
Sudan 37
Bangladesh 34
Portugal 33
Iran 30
Iraq 26
Italy 26
Lithuania 26
Syria 25
The figures mean that the conviction rate for British nationals is 1.13 per 10k, whereas for foreign nationals it is 1.69 per 10k, a rate which is 48.7% higher. If we include “unknown” convictions in the data, then the conviction rate for foreign nationals is 130.3% higher (1.13 per 10k compared to 2.62 per 10k)
Looking at the above stats, I do see a number of Muslim majority nationalities – Pakistanis, Afghans, Bangladeshis. Yet I also see some of the largest number of convictions are non-Muslim majority nationalities -Indians (does have a sizeable Muslim minority but the data doesn’t split the Indian convicts by religion, and ultimately India is majority Hindu), Romanians and Poles all exceed Pakistanis.
Martin, I don’t really have a dog in this fight, but isn’t the current controversy centered on the idea that there was a significantly large number of rapes which were never pursued legally, and thus wouldn’t show up in these numbers?
Right on, bobby!
(And i do not have a dog in this fight, either.)
Martin – it is no longer a matter of “foreign nationals”, it is now a matter of natural increase.
The relevant population is now second or third generation – and hopes they would “assimilate” have proved to be nonsense (many people, as far back as the 1960s, pointed out these hopes were nonsense – but warnings were ignored).
This is why the policy of “ending immigration” will not deal with the matter – as the demographic change, and the cultural change (such as the rape gangs targeting infidel girls) that results from the demographic change, is no long a matter of “immigration”, it is a matter of natural increase – births.
Someone back in the 1950s or 1960s might have sincerely believed there would be assimilation – but for establishment people to carry on, in 2025, claiming that this will occur (now we are three generations in) is incredibly dishonest.
And for those who do not know – pop music, Association Football, and going white-water-rafting in Wales (as the 7,7, London Underground bombers did – as a “Team Building Exercise”) is NOT assimilation, assimilation is a matter of basic BELIEFS.
Someone like Ben Habib (born and raised in Pakistan) or former Bishop Ali of Rochester (also born and raised in Pakistan) are assimilated (so it is NOT a matter of biological race), but the Islamic Rape Gangs are NOT assimilated – not in their BELIEFS.
By the way….. the British establishment, mostly white (pinkish grey) is NOT assimilated either – as traditional British beliefs (such as support for Freedom of Speech) are totally rejected by this (again white) establishment – indeed they do not believe in any individual rights AGAINST the state, or against private criminals.
A lady a few miles down the road from me (over in Peterborough) is serving 17 years in prison for stabbing the man who was raping and strangling her.
This is because the British establishment (the local branch of the international establishment), including the judges, do NOT believe in the right of self-defense (especially not with a weapon) – not against the state, or against private criminals.
Never denied this. Have been a Powellite with regards to immigration and ‘race relations’ since I was about 18-19 years old so you’re preaching to the converted.
You seem to think everyone has to make the point *you* would make, or they are missing the point. Did it ever occur to you they are trying to make a different point?
@Martin Good point. However we should probably use offences for which people were convicted, rather than convictions, as the counter.
@ Martin – in a discussion about the failures of the UK system to pursue and prosecute some sex offenders, it does seem a little – uninformative – to trot out figures for convictions obtained by that system. A more-cynical person than I, reading some of the reports and inquirues into the matter, might conclude that the paltry numbers of convictions for some ethnic groups, when compared with the reported and admitted scale of these atrocities, actually go to support the suggestion that the system deliberately, continuously and systemically ignored these crimes when committed by members of those ethnic groups.
llater,
llamas
Given that rape and other sexual crimes have low conviction rates, and on top of the grooming gang scandals, I am sure those stats understate the scale of the problem.
The stats as they are do illustrate we are importing sex offenders from loads of countries though now. Which supports my contention that immigration is the worst problem in contemporary Britain. Especially at the scale allowed since Boris Johnson became PM, it’s making everything worse.
Martin,
“Given that rape and other sexual crimes have low conviction rates, and on top of the grooming gang scandals, I am sure those stats understate the scale of the problem.”
I understood the comment differently. The issue is not about low conviction rates – that would reduce your number of offenders as well. The issue here is if your average albanian or brit or whatever is being done for 1 or 2 offences, where there is a substantial cohort of Pakistanis from Kashmir with 10s or 100s of offences, the ratios are going to look different if you choose offenders vs offences.
250K victims: the scale is staggering, I bet no one here can think of any examples of a similar scale, at anytime or anywhere in human history.
Perry – if you look at the post, specifically the quotation in the second paragraph, you can see that the person knows the real point very well – but then moves away from it.
So you are wrong Perry – the lady was NOT trying to make a different point. She went as far down the road as she dared go – and then stopped, and stopped for quite understandable reasons.
The state is ruthless, and most large corporations are joined at the hip with it, so opposition (real opposition) leads to terrible consequences for he dissenter.
Better to behave like young Mr Peters of GB News – pretend that the work of other people is your own work, and be careful NOT to suggest there is anything wrong with the basic teachings of Islam.
That way you do not get sacked – indeed you get awards.