Magna Carta: yours for $21,321,000 (£10.6M);
Tales of Beedle the Bard: £1,950,000 ($4M)
Of course tha latter may be a more useful guide to one’s liberties in New Britain ™
|
|||||
|
We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people. Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house] Authors
Arts, Tech & CultureCivil LibertiesCommentary
Economics |
Value really is subjectiveDecember 19th, 2007 |
 3 comments to Value really is subjective |
Who Are We?The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling. We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe. CategoriesArchivesFeed This PageLink Icons   |
|||
All content on this website (including text, photographs, audio files, and any other original works), unless otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons License. |
|||||
At least someone had the sense to charge for one copy of our holiest charter of freedom. If Gordon Brown had been in charge of the deal then he would probably given it away, seeing how his party has consistently treated the Magna Carta as toilet paper anyway.
Good to see that the last copy in private hands has remained that way; makes it a bit harder for the government to claim they are all “too fragile” to be put on public display, and thus to encourage us to forget there was ever a document that offered us certain freedoms.
Economic value is subjective – but then the value of great charter is not just how much money someone is prepared to pay for it (which will be less than or equal to the monetary value they place on the document).
MarkE – the copy at Lincoln Castle is on display (or was the last time I was there), but I agree that the powers-that-be do not like it.
They can dismiss it as just about “Barons and Church” – but the fact that anyone could make the state limit its activties is something they do not like at all.
One of the last actions of Pope Innocent III (he of the sake of Constantinople, the persecution of the Jews, the crusade aganst the Cathars, and various other things that were in no way his fault) was to annul Magna Carta.
Thankfully the Barons did not accept this – and neither did a lot of learned Churchmen.
A charter of liberties should be well written – that is what the Churchmen are for. But its basis is military – or it is worthless.
Even the Charter of Henry the First in 1100 was based in military matters.
Henry offered various limitations on state power in return for the people of England rising to help fight his elder brother.
In Anglo Saxon law (as with all germanic codes – and the nongermanic codes of the Classical World before the rise of the Empire) a free man is someone who is allowed to carry weapons, for the defence of himslef and the Republic (the public – Res Publica) in general.
The British Bill of Rights (now long forgotten – even by “conservatives”) and the American State and Union Bill of Rights are based on the same principle.