We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Will Schlichter’s book be out soon enough, and when should I review it?

Even by his standards, Detlev Schlichter’s latest blog posting is quite a read. Quote:

Evil and dumb people can be dealt with. The deeply-convinced do-gooders in positions of almost unchecked power, those are the ones we should worry about, those who are full of good intentions but suffer from tunnel-vision, incurably in awe of their own theories and incapable of even beginning to grasp how what they are doing could make things worse.

Schlichter seems to me also to be rather worried about something else. What if, in the words of one of our recent commenters (on this), Lee Moore, “the roof falls in” before Schlichter’s book comes out? Given what Paper Money Collapse says, Schlichter will never be an entirely happy man until the world is back on the gold standard, but he won’t be at all a happy man until his book sees the light of day, on both sides of the Atlantic, given the current state of the world’s financial system. If all hell breaks loose before the book even goes on sale, he will merely look like he is analysing the catastrophe, but with the juicy details stripped out. But, if doomsday obliges by not happening quite yet, he will, when doomsday does come, be a prophet of doom proved right. Far better.

Given that timing with books, especially books about soon-to-be-current affairs, can be so important, I am puzzled as to why Schlichter’s book is due out on August 31 2011 here in the UK, but not until October 4th 2011 in the USA. Its American publisher confirms this date discrepancy, although they only talk about August and October (I did the comparison by using this page). Can anyone talk me through this? I know nothing of what the rules are for publishing books on both sides of the Atlantic at nearly but not exactly the same time. Maybe this kind of gap is routine. Maybe, for instance, they figure that what with Schlichter being based in London, London should get to read it first, because maybe London will be particularly friendly. Or, maybe it’s something to do with local book the markets.

More specifically, can any Samizdata reader advise me about what exact date it would make sense for me (given that I am already reading an advance pdf of it) to publish my review of this book? I have already emailed the publishers about this, but they were rather vague. I said “early September” and they said fine. But exactly when would make the most sense? If, now that I have gone public with this question, they want to tell me a more precise date, that would be most helpful.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare on RedditShare on Google+Share on VK

5 comments to Will Schlichter’s book be out soon enough, and when should I review it?

  • The delay does seem idiotic. Have the American publishers no concept of “seizing the moment”?

    When Bishop Hill / A W Montfort’s book on the Hockey Stick shennanigans was about to come out he quickly added a last chapter on the CRU hack, which broke about that time.

  • TDK

    Normally, having differing release dates in different geographies is designed for maximizing promotion. The author (or actor/film maker/artist etc) can’t be in two places at the same time.

  • Ben

    Why not now?

  • Laird

    I can’t speak to the timing of the releases (other to lament that it isn’t sooner!), but to turn to the substance of Schlichter’s lastest essay I think that it’s one of his best yet (which is truly saying something). Here’s my favorite paragraph:

    Forget the debt-ceiling debate in the U.S. It’s trivial. What really matters is this: as long as there is a Federal Reserve and as long as it is run by men like Mr. Bernanke – dedicated, smart but hopelessly committed to a flawed belief system – the economy will not be a capitalist one, benefiting fully from saving, entrepreneurship and true capital accumulation but will always be addicted to easy money, cheap credit and propped up asset markets.

    For anyone who hasn’t done so, it’s worth the time to go back and read some of his earlier posts, too.

  • phwest

    I’m assuming it needs to be translated…