new rights for young people to take up opportunities for education and trainingDon't they already have those?
and the support they need to take up these opportunitiesAnd that? (Education Maintenance Allowance, inter alia.)
"nicht war" would mean "not was".
You mean "nicht wahr" = "not true".
Thought it looked wrong. My spelling is fairly dodgy, even in English.
Will our young Brownshirts have to sing this as well?
(There's some complete fucking morons in that YouTube comment section)
Yeah, I rather liked it. I know that neo-nazis and the like are frequently thick but the ones on that thread totally failed to appreciate the context of the clip. Complete knuckle-draggers. They'd probably enjoy "The Producers" as well!
Reading those comments, I'm impressed that a bunch of inbred Aryan chimpanzees can manage to find Youtube.
Nazis: proof that, on dark nights when nobody's around, people in the deepest darkest corner of Bavaria have had sex with pigs (with the pigs in the driver's seat)
YADATROT: Brown says:
So I recall a British story of liberty(...)best advanced in the modern world when we recognise the responsibilities we owe to each other..
He's an ass. I don't know of any better way to say it.
He is why, whenever someone says "Fuck you, pig" to me at work, deep in my heart I rejoice.
First people are compelled to stay at school till 16 years of age.
The teenagers who do not want to be at school just disrupt and make it very difficult for anyone else to learn.
Then there were bribes (taken from the taxpayer) to get 16 to 18 year olds (or even under 16s) to go Colleges of Further Education - which they ruined for the students who did want to be there (because they wanted to learn).
Now the 16 to 18 year olds are going to be CONSCRIPTED.
Only the Brownites will not use the words "conscript" or "conscription".
So young men (for that is what teenagers are) are going to being forced into schools or colleges (by the threat of fines or prison or whatever).
However, teachers are not quite in the same position as Army N.C.O.s in the 1950's (or even teachers in the 1950's) so controlling these young people is going to be a "bit of a problem".
Still I may have got the wrong end of the stick.
If may be that the 16 to 18 year olds will just not get benefits if they refuse to go to school or college.
That would not be conscription. But why not just NOT GIVE THEM BENEFITS WHETHER THEY GO INTO "EDUCATION" OR NOT?
No able bodied young person need be out of work - otherwise hundreds of thousands of people from Eastern Europe could not find work all over the country.
So these young people on benefits should simply stop being given benefits - there should be no nonsense about "we will give you benefits if you go into education".
"But the young will not work in these low level jobs, they would prefer a life of crime".
Then put them in jail (after they have committed crimes) - after all after (or during) their compulsory "education" they are going to jail anyway.
Of course, like the black hearted reactionary I am, I would suggest trying the old Isle of Man punishment for crimes, before the young criminals had to be sent to prison.
But corporal punishment is considered barbaric today. So off to prison with them, where they will rot.
Pity really - as I doubt there is anything genetically wrong with them.
In a way it is "the fault of society" - but it is the collapse of Civil Society (for example the acceptance of personal responiblity for criminal acts) that is the fault.
Traditional families, voluntary associations (such as the scouts and so on in urban areas) and churches (and traditional teaching by churches) have all gone into decline.
The young people who are not interested in education or training, and who will not accept low level jobs, are the result of this decline.
Their grandfathers (or these days great grandfathers) would have been disgusted by them, but it is hard to see how civilization will get stronger again.
More likely it will continue to get weaker.
Has Balls been for his mandatory indoctrination at the University of Delaware, one wonders?