The jewel in the crown of Samizdata.net
A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective. We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR
[Russ.,= self-publishing house]
There is much to find for those who look
We are not alone
Made possible by...
 
April 18, 2010
Sunday
 
 
Interesting-looking paper on dealing with pirates of the non-cyber kind
Johnathan Pearce (London)  Self defence & security • Transport

Via Instapundit, is an academic paper on the issue of how merchant vessels can protect themselves from pirates. This will not break new ground for Samizdata regulars, of course, but I recommend it.

Talking of merchant shipping, if this volcanic ash problem continues to mess up air travel, then merchant shipping is likely to get a boost in the short run. Bring brack the transAtlantic ocean liners, maybe. Here's a website where you can even buy such monsters of the sea. Bit out of my price range, alas.

Comments

I think there should be a revival of the Q ships. These were innocent looking merchant ships in WW1 which were actually heavily armed with a naval crew. There should be a take no prisoners policy, so the existence of the Q ships doesn't get out. Eventually when the pirates stop returning from their trips, the pool of volunteers will dry up.


Posted by Edmund Burke at April 19, 2010 08:39 PM

Q-ships, good idea, but it won't have much effect without the no prisoners policy. And that's the sticking point. The current effort to suppress piracy is failing because the tranzis won't allow pirates to have their "human rights" (as defined by the tranzis) breached in the slightest.


Posted by Natalie Solent at April 20, 2010 12:07 AM

Many governments (including that of the United States) make problems for armed civilian ships (the only real way to stop pirates - as the navy can not be everywhere at once).

Perhaps governments are wise (in their own twisted and vile form of "wisdom") as about half of the ships that defeated the Spanish Armada (supposedly the most powerful government fleet that had every sailed) were private merchant ships.

And even in 1812 elements of the Royal Navy (the most powerful navy the world had ever seen) were defeated many times by American merchant ships.

In the depths of their dark hearts the statists may not just be concerned with the lives of pirates when they discourage armed merchant ships.



Posted by Paul Marks at April 20, 2010 09:13 AM

I hadn't thought of that until you raised the possibility, Paul. It makes sense. The threat of a good example.

I don't think that there are many government baddies consciously thinking that way, but people often have an incredibly sensitive "nose" for their own self-interest and class-interest that operates a little below the conscious level.


Posted by Natalie Solent at April 20, 2010 10:43 AM
but people often have an incredibly sensitive "nose" for their own self-interest and class-interest that operates a little below the conscious level
That is very well put Natalie, and this is the rather more realistic alternative to all the silly conspiracy theories.
Posted by Alisa at April 20, 2010 02:45 PM

If we really wanted to stop Somali piracy a half dozen W88 475 kT warheads over the appropriate population centres would do the trick. Call it the modern-day equivalent of the Barbary Wars.


Posted by David Gillies at April 21, 2010 07:03 AM

Natalie and Alisa:

Agreed.


Posted by Paul Marks at April 22, 2010 03:12 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?


Enter anti-spambot Turing code:





Select some text and click this to format it as a quote Make the selected text bold Make the selected text italic Add a web link


Basic html active.

Alas, but for obscure reasons Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not harness to power of the push-button formatting options and shall therefore compose basic html with their bare hands. Yet Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not fear, for we shall reveal forthwith the mysteries of Basic Html:

<strong>This text in-between is bold</strong>

<em>This text is in italics</em>

And
<blockquote>This is a quote</blockquote>
Remember to close your opened tags as such: <tag> tagged text and closing </tag> and we promise you will get out of here alive.

For adding links, either use the link URL button on the toolbar or enter your code by hand in the following format:
<a href="http://www.your_link.com">your link text or description here</a>

Movable Type's anti-spambot e-mail address protection is enabled.

You are a guest on private property. Have fun but please be civil and succinct. Blogroaches will be persecuted, not to mention IP banned.

Long third party quotes or articles will also be deleted... so just link to articles you think are germane to your comment, don't quote the whole bloody thing.