The jewel in the crown of Samizdata.net
A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective. We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR
[Russ.,= self-publishing house]
There is much to find for those who look
We are not alone
Made possible by...
 
July 29, 2008
Tuesday
 
 
A lot of reptiles
Johnathan Pearce (London)  Asian affairs • Sports

I came across this statistic here, stating that there will be 22,000 journalists at the Beijing Olympics next week.

The local bars will be doing a roaring trade, one hopes.

Jesus.

Comments

Can't be bothered to check, but I'm guessing that's more journalists than athletes. I know the BBC are sending many more presenters etc than the UK is sending athletes. And the BBC travel at my expense!


Posted by MarkE at July 29, 2008 04:52 PM

It's hard to believe that there are that many journalists in the whole world, let alone that many (a) who can be spared from other duties reporting on "real news," and (b) for whom their employers are willing to pay what will undoubtedly be some pretty hefty travel expenses on such a boondoggle.

Now, the next question: are that many journalists going to Beijing merely because it's a chance to visit the "mysterious orient" at company expense, or because the Olympics are really that much of a draw? If it's the latter, just wait until London in 2012! The place will be a madhouse. Probably a good time to be out of town.


Posted by Laird at July 29, 2008 05:09 PM

Not just the bars, I suspect.


Posted by Michael Jennings at July 29, 2008 06:32 PM

Well there are journalists and journalists Laird.
The news ones will not be sent to cover sports now will they!Well unless some terrorist outrage ensues.
Anymore than you expect Johnathan Davies or Des Lynam to turn up on the Afgan border covering the war.
There are 205 Nations taking part, and rather a lot of events. So actually the figure isn't that unreasonable.
But hey go with the flow eh?

Whimps the lot of them!

I covered the Glastonbury Festival twice in the late 70s early 80s, all on my todd, with just one lensman.
(But this is utterly impossible now) :-)


Posted by RAB at July 29, 2008 11:36 PM

Do people honestly even care about the Olympics any more? I bow to no man when it comes the nationalistic dick waving, but don't we already have a method of sorting out which nation is better than another?

I thought it was called war.


Posted by Hank Scorpio at July 30, 2008 02:14 AM

There are 205 nations taking part in the Olympics? Is that correct? Seriously, I thought the total count of nations on this planet was about 180. Where did all these others come from?


Posted by Laird at July 30, 2008 05:20 AM

The Beeb's contribution to the jamboree is 437 journalists, up 33 from the number that went to Greece. How many British athletes are going?


Posted by RobtE at July 30, 2008 07:05 AM

Laird: The United Nations has 192 member states at the moment. There are a couple of countries or near-countries that for various reasons are not members, most notably Taiwan and Palestine. (Some will disagree that these are countries, but that is the point). Both of these places have Olympic teams, however.

However, the International Olympic Committee takes a laxer definition of a "country" than many other international organisations, so territories of countries that administratively and/or historically separate from the bulk of the nation often have separate Olympic teams. For instance, Hong Kong has a separate team from China, and Puerto Rico a separate team from the United States. A few more of this kind of thing gets you 205 Olympic "nations"


Posted by Michael Jennings at July 30, 2008 10:04 AM

I hear that the Chinese have installed spy-ware in all hotel computers. Just in case any of the foreign journalists there tries to report that the Chinese gymnasts are still in possession of their baby teeth.


Posted by WalterBoswell at July 30, 2008 12:29 PM

More than likely Walter.

They are already doing this

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20080729/ap_on_re_as/oly_china_internet_blocked

Now were are those nice folk from Another Voice of China, for an explanation when you need them.


Posted by RAB at July 30, 2008 04:40 PM

22,000? Doesn't that outnumber the athletes?


Posted by Alan K. Henderson at July 31, 2008 07:56 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?


Enter anti-spambot Turing code:





Select some text and click this to format it as a quote Make the selected text bold Make the selected text italic Add a web link


Basic html active.

Alas, but for obscure reasons Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not harness to power of the push-button formatting options and shall therefore compose basic html with their bare hands. Yet Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not fear, for we shall reveal forthwith the mysteries of Basic Html:

<strong>This text in-between is bold</strong>

<em>This text is in italics</em>

And
<blockquote>This is a quote</blockquote>
Remember to close your opened tags as such: <tag> tagged text and closing </tag> and we promise you will get out of here alive.

For adding links, either use the link URL button on the toolbar or enter your code by hand in the following format:
<a href="http://www.your_link.com">your link text or description here</a>

Movable Type's anti-spambot e-mail address protection is enabled.

You are a guest on private property. Have fun but please be civil and succinct. Blogroaches will be persecuted, not to mention IP banned.

Long third party quotes or articles will also be deleted... so just link to articles you think are germane to your comment, don't quote the whole bloody thing.