Tuesday
Scott Wickstein notes a priceless piece of bureaucratic imbecility in New Zealand:
A New Zealand council has taken itself to court and successfully been fined $4,800 [...] it will pay itself the fine, minus the court's 10 per cent cut. It has already stumped up $3,000 for pre-trial "outside legal opinion".I also enjoyed an anonymous comment left on the post at Scott's:
I wouldn't be surprised if they lodge an appeal
James,
This is not about destroying wealth, but moving it from the many to the few.
Posted by TimC at March 20, 2007 05:15 PM
moving it from the many to the few.And thus its multiplier effect is largely negated.
Consequently, wealth is destroyed by omission - an entirely unnecessary opportunity cost.
Posted by James Waterton at March 20, 2007 05:22 PM
I forgot to hat tip Michael Jennings for that- he spotted it and alerted me via email.
Posted by Scott Wickstein at March 20, 2007 05:26 PM
This is insane. A waste of taxpayers money.
Hopefully the people who voted for these nut jobs will remember this come the local elections.
Posted by Phil A at March 21, 2007 09:51 AM
It is not a question of the multiplyer effect (an idea of Major Douglas taken up by Lord Keynes) or even of moving money from the many to the few (although this mad court case does do that).
It is a matter of moving money from its rightfully owners (the taxpayers) to the state (the council officials and the court) and its hangers on (in this case the lawyers).
This does have a bad economic effect - but it is also just wrong in-its-self.
Posted by Paul Marks at March 21, 2007 12:21 PM
