The jewel in the crown of Samizdata.net
A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective. We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR
[Russ.,= self-publishing house]
There is much to find for those who look
We are not alone
Made possible by...
 
February 25, 2007
Sunday
 
 
No global warming for South Africa, I guess
Michael Jennings (London)  How very odd!
co2.jpg
Comments

Why the shortage?

Are there price controls on CO2 in South Africa, or something?


Posted by Andy Wood at February 25, 2007 12:21 PM

Well, there are price controls on some things, most notably petrol. (Heaven knows why). I think the key to understanding probably comes in the words "The major supplier of CO2 in South Africa". That is, there is either a de facto or de jure monopoly. Probably we blame past or present government industrial policy. (In truth though, I have no idea. I just saw these signs on refrigerators while I was there. Despite their presence, I never had any problem buying a Coke. (In fact, I have never been anywhere in the entire world where I had difficulty buying a Coke).


Posted by Michael Jennings at February 25, 2007 02:20 PM

There are no price controls on CO2. Its just that Afrox who supplies Coke and SAB had 2 of its major suppliers undergo routine maintenance shutdowns at the same time. More like poor planning by Afrox and coke.


Posted by AndyMo at February 26, 2007 10:15 AM

I just read today in the local newspaper that a plant in my community is going to be producting 250 tons of purified (food and manufacturing grade) liquid CO2 daily as a by-product of another plant's ethanol production. Apparently the CO2 otherwise is just released.

Which makes me wonder, if that kind of CO2 is a by-product of ethanol production even before the ethanol is used (by burning), just how 'green' can ethanol possibly be? I suppose as long as it's not fossil it's a net gain. But it seems efficiency might be an issue.


Posted by Midwesterner at February 27, 2007 12:58 AM

Midwesterner:

You hit the nail on the head with the last sentence. A tremendous amount of energy is expended in converting sugary biomass to ethanol. The CO2 released for heating/boiling and then from fermentation is reclaimed in the next crop. (That is, if no fossil fuels are used for boiling.) So, from the perspective of emissions ethanol should be a net-C02 zero fuel.



Posted by Nate at March 1, 2007 09:55 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?


Enter anti-spambot Turing code:





Select some text and click this to format it as a quote Make the selected text bold Make the selected text italic Add a web link


Basic html active.

Alas, but for obscure reasons Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not harness to power of the push-button formatting options and shall therefore compose basic html with their bare hands. Yet Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not fear, for we shall reveal forthwith the mysteries of Basic Html:

<strong>This text in-between is bold</strong>

<em>This text is in italics</em>

And
<blockquote>This is a quote</blockquote>
Remember to close your opened tags as such: <tag> tagged text and closing </tag> and we promise you will get out of here alive.

For adding links, either use the link URL button on the toolbar or enter your code by hand in the following format:
<a href="http://www.your_link.com">your link text or description here</a>

Movable Type's anti-spambot e-mail address protection is enabled.

You are a guest on private property. Have fun but please be civil and succinct. Blogroaches will be persecuted, not to mention IP banned.

Long third party quotes or articles will also be deleted... so just link to articles you think are germane to your comment, don't quote the whole bloody thing.