The jewel in the crown of Samizdata.net
A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective. We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR
[Russ.,= self-publishing house]
There is much to find for those who look
We are not alone
Made possible by...
 
October 13, 2006
Friday
 
 
Which law would you like to break?
Johnathan Pearce (London)  Civil liberty/regulation

Economist Bryan Caplan has posed the question: which law would you like to break? I guess, that being a libertarian kind of guy, he favours giving the finger to those laws that do not protect life and property but instead regulate our behaviour for our own good.

So, it being the start of the weekend, I shamelessly steal Bryan's idea and pose this question to the Samizdata hordes: which law would you like to break? And also, why?

Comments

What law would I *like* to break?

In my state you can be charged with a felony for carrying a concealed firearm.


Posted by Billy Oblivion at October 13, 2006 07:58 PM

I'm right there with you Billy. Or perhaps buy an HK MP5SD and break the NFA.


Posted by RKV at October 13, 2006 08:08 PM

There' re plenty of laws I'd love to see broken by somebody, like having issue-wrangling, name-mentioning campaign ads or commercials, or like donating a million dollars to the campaign fund of some candidate I agree with. Anything that would stick "Campaign Finance Reform" in the eye. However, I just don't have the money required to do that kind of law-breaking.

So the law-breaking that I'd most love to do is carry conceal. I'd love having my gun in my purse at all times. However, my depressingly blue state of Illinois is one of th 10 states left where carrying (conceal or not) is illegal.

*sigh* If I didn't have so much family here, I'd be out like a shot. Head someplace that didn't require my victimhood by law.


Posted by Laura at October 13, 2006 08:22 PM

There are so many to choose from! I'm assuming that you mean "without penalty" and I think probably my favorite would be whichever combination of laws requires me to pay property taxes. They make it impossible to be left alone.

Essentially property taxes convert private landowners into renters with the taxing authority (the county in my case) in the role of landlord. Since they can force a sale of the property for taxes in much the same way a bank can foreclose, it gives them effective title to the property. Which is not to even mention the eminent domain (compulsory purchase) issue.

Furthermore, zoning, building codes, and other regulation also give the state day to day control over the property as well.

My chosen crime: To be a land owner.


Posted by Ringo at October 13, 2006 08:34 PM

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/539768/posts

I'd like to kiss for six minutes.


Posted by Troy Specter at October 13, 2006 09:10 PM

I'd like to be able to travel freely about my country, including on airplanes, without once being asked for identification, having to surrender my sidearms (or fingernail clippers), or otherwise coming in contact with any government employee or "security" person. (Okay, that's really a whole lot of laws, but it's only one act...)

Why? Because I'd like to be able to travel quickly, cheaply, and safely anywhere I want.


Posted by Ken Hagler at October 13, 2006 09:10 PM

Being in the UK I'd like to be able to call my life immoral[1] while doing my best to give myself cancer[2]. Because freedom only really means anything if you are free to be an arsehole.

[1]There was a woman arrested earlier this year for saying she though being gay was immoral. I am gay and don't think it any of her business, but opinions should never be any business of the state.
[2]Smoking has been banned in pubs. I've talked to doctors specialising in public health and they say that the risks of passive smoking are negligable, this is being done to increase the stigma against smoking. The state should have no place in deciding what you freely choose to put in your own body, even if it is dangerous.


Posted by chris at October 13, 2006 09:33 PM

If every statute and every regulation that comes (as statutory instruments or whatever) from statutes is to be treated as "law", then all of us break laws already (there are a vast numbers of regulations covering life [forbidding we do things that are in no way aggression against the bodies or goods of others, and demanding we do things that are in no way required by contract], and some regulations contradict other regulations).

What "laws" in particular do I break? Well this is a public site, so it would be unwise to give that information.

Although, doubtless, I break some "laws" without knowing it (ignorance is not held as an excuse in court), I have no desire to point to the "laws" I choose to break.


Posted by Paul Marks at October 13, 2006 10:07 PM

The laws prohibiting certain recreational drugs.

If there is ever going to be a major libertarian breakthrough it will be on the back of the widespread discontent about these laws.


Posted by ResidentAlien at October 13, 2006 10:46 PM
If there is ever going to be a major libertarian breakthrough it will be on the back of the widespread discontent about [laws prohibiting certain recreational drugs]

Completely agree. I'm constantly frustrated with the local Libertarian Party over this. I live in Bloomington, IN, which just so happens to house Indiana University's flagship campus. There are over 60,000 undergraduates in this town, not to mention hordes of other associates of the university. Needless to say, the Republicans are completely shut out of elections in the district and usually don't bother to run candidates. It is not unusual for the Libertarian candidate to win 20% of the vote (mostly from people who want to vote Republican, I guess). And yet, our local party chapter thinks it would be a bad idea to stress marijuana legalization in our campaigns.

In a university town.

I mean, how can it honestly fail? It's completely ridiculous. I have no idea what they're afraid of. Honestly - it's in the national party platform after all. Totally frustrating.


Posted by Joshua at October 13, 2006 10:58 PM

Gosh. Where to start?

I already broke the most restrictive law that affected me - the age of consent. I had sex with another man at the age of 17, when the age of consent for gay sex was 21. After years of suffering homophobic abuse at school (while the school claimed it could 'do nothing' to stop it due to Clause 28) it was the least I could do.

Nowadays, I'd like to break the law by - not paying the license fee, not pay any part of the council tax I disagree with, drinking an alcoholic beverage from an open container in the street in the part of Brighton in which I live, and (oh, the joy) lining all the chuggers up against a wall and shooting them. Especially the one collecting for the NSPCC who actually came up and kicked me in the leg after I brushed past her the other day.

I would add to that "taking lots of drugs", but I don't really want to. The thing is, I don't want anyone telling me I can't!


Posted by Aegir Hallmundur at October 13, 2006 11:15 PM

For me it has to be the manufacture and sale of illegal jam.


Posted by Noel Cooper at October 13, 2006 11:33 PM

I would like to go to Saco, Missouri and wear an outlandish hat that frightens timid people and animals. It's forbidden for women to do such things there. I'm still trying to decide an the appropriate hat.


A little OT... Missouri considers drunkenness an "inalienable right.''


Posted by kcbiskit at October 13, 2006 11:45 PM

"which law would you like to break?"

The one forced upon us by our all seeing, all knowing Socialist Nanny State that dictates it will be practically illegal to leave our homes without our ID cards. Can you imagine walking down the street and crossing the road to your local shop for a pint of milk and loaf of bread without an ID card. Oh, the sheer criminality of it. I'm a degenerate law breaker. Call the police and get my prison cell prepared NOW.


Posted by Samsung at October 13, 2006 11:55 PM

I forgot to say why:

1. I've always wanted to break a weird archaic law.

2. I like hats.


Posted by kcbiskit at October 14, 2006 12:03 AM

1. Completely disregard the constitutional amendment that established the income tax for the rest of my life. I hate preparing taxes and keeping all those damned records on a continuing basis. Multiplied by the households of the USA, what a freakin' colossal waste of time. What kind of economic and inventive energy could be unleashed if all those accountants, lawyers, and IRS goons had to seek honest employment elsewhere and all of the rest of us weren't so hogtied by that nightmare of a tax code?

2. Buy a sex toy in Texas. Better yet, sell them from a street vendor's cart on the steps of the capitol in Austin, Texas. Just for spite and to help them Texas chicks with their stress management. *grin*


Posted by kentuckyliz at October 14, 2006 12:03 AM

Please, the question is too easy. I'd like to buy, own, and shoot a .50 caliber Browning belt-fed machine gun. Screw the cost of ammo.


Posted by George L. at October 14, 2006 12:33 AM

I'm with biskit and kentuck---give me some scary hats and sex toys and I'm ready to party all weekend.

Of course, a lot of the weekend is naptime, but I'll be scary, not to mention buzzing or inflating or something... yeehaw!


Posted by veryretired at October 14, 2006 01:44 AM

Open season on spammers!


Posted by tdh at October 14, 2006 01:49 AM

I and most people here break laws all the time. So this question is pretty moot.

Modern western countries have so many laws its almost impossible to go through a day without breaking some kind of law.


Posted by Yobbo at October 14, 2006 02:22 AM

Death and Taxes.


Posted by chuck at October 14, 2006 02:59 AM

No doubt it's impressive that no one has plumped for the right/privilege to "kill people who need killing,' but it seems a waste to spend One Free Law on funny hats.


Posted by ha! at October 14, 2006 07:13 AM

After looking at that list of laws Troy posted above, I think I found one that should be common sense.

Memphis: Illegal for a woman to drive by herself; "a man must walk or run in front of the vehicle, waving a red flag in order to warn approaching pedestrians and motorists".

Makes sense to me.


Posted by Robert at October 14, 2006 07:39 AM

Smuggling. Doesn't the very word make you want to drop everything and buy a speedboat?


Posted by Stephen Davis at October 14, 2006 10:09 AM

Stand outside Number 10 Downing Street and yell, "Blair, You're a thieving, lying, authoritarian scumbag".

Breach of: Peace Act, 1361, Serious Organised Crime and Police Act, 2005, Crime and Disorder Act, 1998 and the Police Reform Act, 2002.


Posted by Julian Taylor at October 14, 2006 10:13 AM

All of them.


Posted by Another Expat at October 14, 2006 11:31 AM

Well I'm flying to America soon and not being able to smoke on the plane pisses me off. So I'd like to smoke on a plane to America.

And not just a ciggy...

I wanna smoke a gigantic cuban cigar.

And have a go on the controls. I've played Mig Alley and Strike Fighters - I'll figure it out.


Posted by Nick M at October 14, 2006 11:51 AM

the laws of gravity


Posted by Giles at October 14, 2006 01:24 PM

I'd like to break the second law of thermodynamics and invent a perpetual motion machine.


Posted by Pepe at October 14, 2006 02:56 PM

I'd like to buy the biggest, scariest most ludicrously powerful handgun available and open carry it in the local town centre. While wearing an "I hate chavs" t-shirt.


Posted by Steve at October 14, 2006 02:57 PM

I would love to break the law of unintended consequences but there would probably be a down side I hadn't counted on...


Posted by Michael Farris at October 14, 2006 05:37 PM

I'm generally with "all of them", but since I can already walk down the street with a belt fed machine gun in hand legally, that one doesn't turn my crank nearly as much (unless I feel like shocking people who don't realize its legal here in New Hampshire).

My preference is to simply drive, travel, live, eat, piss, screw, buy, sell, work, hunt, fish, shoot, farm, log, build, etc. without any sort of license, permit, remit, stamp of approval, tax, or otherwise filing of paperwork in duplicate, triplicate, or even in original format, whether with dead trees or electronically, to beg some overpaid underworked overauthorized pompous ass to be able to live my life as a human being.

"I will not be briefed, debriefed, filed, stamped, punched, or numbered, I AM A FREE MAN!"

That being said, I'll take driving without a license.


Posted by Mike Lorrey at October 14, 2006 08:31 PM

""No doubt it's impressive that no one has plumped for the right/privilege to "kill people who need killing,' but it seems a waste to spend One Free Law on funny hats."

Well, "Ha",
That makes sense to me. I'd like to change my crime. Forget the hat thing. I'd like one day to be free to kill people who need killin' such as nasty little snide pricks.


Posted by kcbiskit at October 15, 2006 02:12 AM

The law that says foreign-born immigrants can't be president


Posted by stuart at October 15, 2006 07:59 AM

I have not filed any sort of income data with IRS, nor paid a single penny of income tax, since 1977.

Why?

Because what I produce is mine, and nobody can have it without my permssion. Nobody.

That is all.


Posted by Billy Beck at October 15, 2006 02:22 PM

I fully intend to not have an ID card if and when they are introduced.


Posted by David Gillies at October 15, 2006 06:50 PM

"Whaddya got?"

Any one of 'em I feel is restrictive......


Posted by gravid at October 16, 2006 11:04 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?


Enter anti-spambot Turing code:





Select some text and click this to format it as a quote Make the selected text bold Make the selected text italic Add a web link


Basic html active.

Alas, but for obscure reasons Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not harness to power of the push-button formatting options and shall therefore compose basic html with their bare hands. Yet Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not fear, for we shall reveal forthwith the mysteries of Basic Html:

<strong>This text in-between is bold</strong>

<em>This text is in italics</em>

And
<blockquote>This is a quote</blockquote>
Remember to close your opened tags as such: <tag> tagged text and closing </tag> and we promise you will get out of here alive.

For adding links, either use the link URL button on the toolbar or enter your code by hand in the following format:
<a href="http://www.your_link.com">your link text or description here</a>

Movable Type's anti-spambot e-mail address protection is enabled.

You are a guest on private property. Have fun but please be civil and succinct. Blogroaches will be persecuted, not to mention IP banned.

Long third party quotes or articles will also be deleted... so just link to articles you think are germane to your comment, don't quote the whole bloody thing.