The jewel in the crown of Samizdata.net
A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective. We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR
[Russ.,= self-publishing house]
There is much to find for those who look
We are not alone
Made possible by...
 
February 02, 2006
Thursday
 
 
The limits of free speech
Natalie Solent (Essex)  Opinions on liberty

The contributors and most of the commenters to this site actively defend the free speech rights of fanatics, bigots, blasphemers and pornographers. Where the shield wall falters, that is where we go to fight. I think we have the right to be proud of that.

But I wonder if even we do not still have our sacred cows - sacred cows that need to be slaughtered.

I am fully aware that the disclosure I am about to make may cause outrage even among people who think of themselves as absolutists when it comes to free speech. I must apologise in advance to Perry and the others who have extended me the hospitality of this site for what may seem to be an abuse of it. I realise that there are some people who may think that, having said in public what I am about to say, they can never associate with me again. Forgive me. I feel I have to say this.

"Mornington Crescent" is not a real game. The rules and strategies you hear quoted by players are made up on the spot. Its only purpose is to have a laugh at the expense of those not in the know.

Comments

Sorry, but no amount of persuasion will ever convince me that Mornington Crescent isn't a real game. I was talking about it with Father Christmas a few weeks ago - he and the elves play it all the time in fact. He's promised me the rule book too, next time he visits me.


Posted by Tuscan Tony at February 2, 2006 09:14 PM

Nice try at a double-bluff, Ms Solent, but it won't wash. Everyone knows there's a real Mornington Crescent game, but that only members of the Illuminati are allowed to know the rules.

My turn, I think?


Posted by GCooper at February 2, 2006 09:19 PM

Oh, you win. Earls Court.


Posted by Natalie Solent at February 2, 2006 09:36 PM

No, under the "East Anglia advantage" it is actually my turn:

Ealing Broadway


Posted by Charles Pooter at February 2, 2006 09:39 PM

You bitch. you heathen unbeliever. Take this post down within 20 days or you're dead.

Everyone knows that it is blasphemous to write down the rules. Or draw cartoons of Mrs S Trellis of North Wales.


Posted by The Pedant-General at February 2, 2006 10:00 PM

What, like

"if a player moves to such a location that there are less than two occupied bases between the location played and the next but one Shift Zone, Morton's Convention being in play, whether the Loop has been vectored from either Diagonal or not... then that move is declared under-struck"


Posted by Rich at February 2, 2006 10:01 PM

If you don't know the rules, you've already lost, and the game's playing you.


Posted by Julian Morrison at February 2, 2006 10:05 PM

What's that quote about how any sufficiently advanced alien technology will seem indistinguishable from magic. That must have an analogy here. Just because you can't comprehend the rules, you invent this 'rationalisation'. It's quite laughable that you think even Tim Brooke-Taylor capable of such an act.

PS Where's the post on sewing?


Posted by Colin at February 2, 2006 10:16 PM

Colin?

You're not on yet: It's Mornington Crescent we're doing here, not "The words of one song to the tune of another".

they always said you were useless.

PG


Posted by The Pedant-General at February 2, 2006 10:34 PM

Brilliant Natalie!
Sucked me right in and spat me right out again!
Um, Edgeware Road.


Posted by RAB at February 2, 2006 11:59 PM

Sometimes you British are . . . odd. Entertaining, though.

Euston Square.

F


Posted by Frogman at February 3, 2006 12:44 AM

As there is no such thing as objective truth, according to our masters, a law should be passed to prevent you trying to undermine the faith in the believers in this game by claiming it is not real. As you there by hurt their feelings and undermine their self esteem.

Of course claiming that laws should be there to protect such feelings is a an objective truth claim (the claim that it is objectively true that there should be laws to protect people's feelings).

But there you go.


Posted by Paul Marks at February 3, 2006 01:33 AM

I had a shronk just the other day, and only needed a queen for a Royal Fisbin, but it wasn't Tuesday, so I lost.

The odds have never been calculated.


Posted by veryretired at February 3, 2006 02:15 AM

Blasphemy! Persecute the unbeliever!


Posted by Nick at February 3, 2006 02:21 AM

You might want to view the movie "Bang The Drum Slowly" for the origins of your game.


Posted by Ed at February 3, 2006 02:26 AM

How about this for bursting a sacred cow:

"Lord of the Rings" is crap.


Posted by Ted Schuerzinger at February 3, 2006 02:28 AM

I suppose the next thing you're going to tell us is that Samantha isn't real either.


Posted by RobtE at February 3, 2006 06:47 AM

Of course I'm real, Samantha, NW1 7RD


Posted by Samantha at February 3, 2006 08:44 AM

"Lord of the Rings" is crap.

Yes, well, Bakshi ran out of funds and had to cut some corners, y'see...


Posted by rosignol at February 3, 2006 10:23 AM

How dare Natalie make this assertion without years of study of the game, which would prove that the rules do indeed exist (and are quite simple which no one can deny). Free speech is fine and good but not when it bothers me! NYAH NYAH NYAH!


Posted by michael farris at February 3, 2006 11:55 AM

Freedom of expression must be absolute otherwise it's not truely free.


Posted by TheRealHull at February 3, 2006 12:59 PM

This post is Obviously a disguised Ongar denial, so the game is now in Strick.

Very well, if that's the way you want it.

I expend a Viridian Podume, lowering potential by -5 keV and changing the mutability to involute.

Bayswater, and your turn.


Posted by Zoe Brain at February 3, 2006 01:03 PM

OK, I'll bite. What's "Mornington Crescent"? (Although it's pretty obvious from the above comments that no one really knows.)


Posted by Robert Speirs at February 3, 2006 01:42 PM

It is a real game...I have played it.


Posted by Andrew Ian Dodge at February 3, 2006 05:56 PM

Robert: Of course we do. Dagenham Junction.


Posted by Michael Jennings at February 3, 2006 11:51 PM

I don't recall anyone saying that junctions were wild, Michael. You'll have to miss your next turn.

Parsons Green


Posted by Andy Wood at February 4, 2006 05:35 PM

That's perfectly true, but none the less I tricked you. The Crozier-Livingstone rules (by which I assume we are playing) specifically allow the playing of stations on lines that are under construction. And preparatory works have begun on stage 1 of the East London line extension (which will extend the line from Shoreditch to Dagenham Junction) but not on stage 2 (which will connect the East London Line to to the North London line). Therefore, for Mornington Crescent purposes Dagenham Junction is playable but not technically yet a junction, and is therefore wild.

Southwark.


Posted by Michael Jennings at February 4, 2006 09:10 PM

As it's now Wednesday local time, by the Intenational Dateline 72-hour rule, I can invoke an involute lateral arabesque, but only on a dead thread. I'd set that one up a few turns ago. Didn't see that, did you Michael, or your obvious counter-move would have been Piccadilly, or a more subtle Bank. Anyway it worked,

Mornington Crescent.


Posted by Zoe Brain at February 8, 2006 05:36 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?


Enter anti-spambot Turing code:





Select some text and click this to format it as a quote Make the selected text bold Make the selected text italic Add a web link


Basic html active.

Alas, but for obscure reasons Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not harness to power of the push-button formatting options and shall therefore compose basic html with their bare hands. Yet Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not fear, for we shall reveal forthwith the mysteries of Basic Html:

<strong>This text in-between is bold</strong>

<em>This text is in italics</em>

And
<blockquote>This is a quote</blockquote>
Remember to close your opened tags as such: <tag> tagged text and closing </tag> and we promise you will get out of here alive.

For adding links, either use the link URL button on the toolbar or enter your code by hand in the following format:
<a href="http://www.your_link.com">your link text or description here</a>

Movable Type's anti-spambot e-mail address protection is enabled.

You are a guest on private property. Have fun but please be civil and succinct. Blogroaches will be persecuted, not to mention IP banned.

Long third party quotes or articles will also be deleted... so just link to articles you think are germane to your comment, don't quote the whole bloody thing.