Monday
The US Constitution begins, famously, "We the People...". The European Constitution begins, "His Majesty the King of the Belgians...". That gives you a fair idea of the different spirit of each document.
- Charles Moore
(Hat tip to Taylor Dinerman for pointing out this gem)

"China is one of the countries with the longest histories in the world. The people of all nationalities in China have jointly created a splendid culture and have a glorious revolutionary tradition."
...
"WE, CUBAN CITIZENS, heirs and continuators of the creative work and the traditions of combativity, firmness, heroism and sacrifice fostered by our ancestors;..." [and on and on for pages...]
....
I think you can get a lot from the style. Whose name is put to it is less important, except in most cases you can bet they weren't consulted until the deal was done, which goes for the King of the Belgians, too.
Posted by guy herbert at December 5, 2005 12:59 PM
I also love Mark Steyn's remark on the difference between the U.S. and European Constitutions. The former can be carried in handy book form in your pocket while the latter would probably cause serious spinal injury.
Posted by Johnathan Pearce at December 5, 2005 01:00 PM
Guy - For sure, His Majesty the King of the Belgians, all five of them, would not have been naive enough to force himself to read through the garbage he was putting his name to. It was a done deal. No one gets to ask questions. Not even His Majest the King of the Belgians.
Posted by Verity at December 5, 2005 01:59 PM
"...serious spinal injury," which means that we may have to be banned from attempting to refer to it (for our own good, of course).
Posted by guy herbert at December 5, 2005 02:59 PM
Still, the US Supreme Court is as likely to pay attention to His Belgian Majesty's as to the USA's.
Posted by dearieme at December 6, 2005 01:20 AM
It's the part about the state "deriving its just powers from the consent of the governed" that has earned the US the undying enmity of those around the world who would rather believe that political power belongs to whoever can grab it and kill all their rivals.
Since the latter group comprises most of the ruling elites over the course of the last two centuries, not to mention all of human history, it isn't hard to figure out the threat such an idea posed.
Needless to say, I have never been bothered by all this agonized soul-searching about why "they" hate the US. We are, and always have been, an utterly deadly threat to "politics as usual" in most of the rest of the world.
Posted by veryretired at December 6, 2005 04:48 AM
veryretired - Nice to see you here again with your usual incisive insights. You are correct.
Posted by Verity at December 6, 2005 01:21 PM
Mark Steyn said in that same article that it would be more appropriate for it to start with "We know better than the people".
Posted by dubhail at December 6, 2005 05:09 PM
TY Verity.
Family matters have limited my leisure time.
Posted by veryretired at December 7, 2005 06:03 AM
In the USA it's the judges who have been saying 'we know better than the people' since Brown v. Board of Education.
Before that, it was Tyrant Lincoln, who illegally suspended habeas corpus and then issued an arrest warrant for Chief Justice Taney when he protested.
America is a kritarchy, not a democracy, and as big a democratic sham as any other people's republic. Luckily most of the people neither know nor care.
Posted by Matt O'Halloran at December 7, 2005 08:34 PM
I actually had to look up kritarchy. New one on me, which is saying a lot considering my head is essentially a cultch pile of information.
Posted by tomWright at December 7, 2005 09:33 PM









