Friday
It was written as...
The US taxman, the internal revenue service, argues that KPMG's tax shelters between 1996 and 2002 cost the government $1.4bn in lost revenues.
But I prefer to see it as... "KPMG's tax shelters between 1996 and 2002 saved the public $1.4bn which was used to generate productive economic activity"

Although in much of the cases, the tax shelters divert money from more productive economic activity into less productive economic activity that happens to be taxed less. Of course, this is really the fault of the taxes.
Posted by John Thacker at June 17, 2005 04:54 AM
Still, John, the shelters are sure to be more productive than the taxes.
And the natural defense of tax shelters is that those who place their money in them are just responding to the incentives of the government, that is, doing what the government wants.
Many tax shelters are the result of using the tax code as an instrument of social engineering anyway.
Posted by R C Dean at June 17, 2005 12:06 PM
I wonder how many minutes it takes the US government to spend 1.4 billion dollars? a billion here a billion there, pretty soon you're talking about some real money.
Posted by MikeG at June 17, 2005 02:05 PM
Well, if the US budget is 2 trillion dollars, that means they spend about 5.5 billion a day. 1.4 billion would take about 6-7 hours.
It's barely even walking around money. :)
Posted by Brian Moore at June 17, 2005 05:04 PM
I'm getting the impression that DOJ is trying to drive KPMG out of the market, bankrupt them; and then file an antitrust lawsuit against the remaining three big accounting firms (Deloitte, Ernst & Young, Coopers) in the U.S., on the basis of the "three firm" rule - that is if there are three firms or less in the market, that those firms are possessed of "market power" and pose a danger to competition and the customers. I'm getting a little sick of the anti-corporate populism.
Posted by Al Maviva at June 18, 2005 01:46 AM
That is a good start but would it not be far better to make sure the Taxes were low enough so that people did not need to find ways of getting out of having to pay them?
Posted by Andrew Ian Dodge at June 19, 2005 07:58 PM









