Monday
This item is in from the folks at DownSizeDC:
TIME IS RUNNING OUTI'm sending out today's Downsizer-Dispatch message earlier than usual. The Senate may vote TODAY on the "emergency" appropriations bill and the REAL ID Act. Hammer them. And do it now.
Let them know that you know that they can vote down this bill and then come back and do the spending bill again (that is, if they really must take another step toward national bankruptcy), only next time they should do it without the REAL ID Act. Tell them you know it won't be easy, but you want them to show some backbone on this vote. Tell them you will remember what they do. The REAL ID Act must not be passed.

Sorry. Downsize has to streamline its sign-up procedure. I went through the whole drill, then I was asked to start over. I don't have the patience. My senators are confirmed socialists anyway......
Posted by Col. Hogan at May 10, 2005 05:57 AM
National ID cards seem to become a popular trend. Over here (.nl) it is now mandatory to carry ID as well. Cops cannot just go around and ask for it, but the whole point is good intent cannot be trusted endlessly.
Posted by Robert John Kaper at May 10, 2005 07:20 AM
The most disturbing part to me, is that it isn't too hard to find actual details about the REAL ID ACT on government websites i.e it's a "real" thing, but for the life of me can't find a single article in any major/mainstream news sources about it (oh wait... I found *one* form NPR). Neither about it's passing the house last Thursday or the possible vote on it today.
In England... during the process of law making do they have they same procedure where as they slip what would be an unpopular/controversial bill into other bills that save Children, feed the hungry, support the troops etc..?
Posted by Duncan Sutherland at May 10, 2005 02:04 PM
No. But there are a couple of similarly dangerous tendencies here: the ragbag act (usually something to do with Criminal Justice) where dozens of disparate tinkering measures are shoved in with a couple of high profile popular themes and get through barely examined; and "framework" legislation, where parliament gives the executive wide power to make substantive law through regulation.
The American approach derives from the fact that your legislators will actually vote the way that suits them (and their backers maybe) if they understand the measures, so the Bills have to be made unreadable and filled with poison pills. Ours is driven by the exigencies of the party system and media attention in the first case, and the constitutional possiblilty of avoiding scrutiny altogether in the second.
Posted by guy herbert at May 10, 2005 08:06 PM









