The jewel in the crown of Samizdata.net
A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective. We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR
[Russ.,= self-publishing house]
There is much to find for those who look
We are not alone
Made possible by...
 
April 28, 2005
Thursday
 
 
Do you really want me to answer that?
Michael Jennings (London)  UK affairs

stupid.JPG

If I thought the Tories genuinely would spend £35bn less on "public services" I might even vote for them. However....

Comments

What else would one expect of a near-Communist trade union?

As for this voting business, I was all set to make my mark for UKIP. Then I heard Roger Knapman, the party's leader, on BBC R4, on the one hand describing its policies as 'libertarian' while, more or less in the same breath, saying how UKIP would have come to the financial rescue of Rover.

God rot them all!


Posted by GCooper at April 28, 2005 08:48 PM

The statist mindset is absolute. Nothing other than state action can possibly help in any conceivable situation where a problem can be found or created.

I think the phrase is "one trick pony."


Posted by veryretired at April 28, 2005 10:29 PM

Not as much as spending £70 billion less.

Of course, neither is an option in this Election. If the Conservatives got in, and everything went according to plan, their spending would end up at around 40% of GDP, versus 42% under NuLab. It's not something to get excited about, which is why Howard is trying to stir things up by calling blair a liar. Hello Michael, tell us something we don't know mate.


Posted by John K at April 29, 2005 10:12 AM

"If I thought the Tories would cut £35bn, I might even vote for them".

Quite.

I am trying to persuade myself to vote Labour on the old Marxist basis that Labour is objectively FOR anti-statism: I would sooner they were re-elected and get us to the utter point of statist ruin quickly, so that we can then rebuild, than see the Tories elected, get us there more slowly, in the process discrediting whatever notions of small government they find the balls to advocate, and postpone even further the process of post-statist reconstruction.

It's a bit like Winnie Mandela supporting sanctions against south Africa on the grounds that, since the black majority suffered most under sanctions, they would revolt more quickly against apartheid.

All that militates against this analysis is a) the sheer brass neck with which statists picked themselves up and brushed themselves off after the collapse of the USSR, and b) the success with which, in doing so, they have maintained their dominance of acceptable parameters of debate and their purported monopoly on virtue.

Ultimately, whatever blame should accrue to statists for the moral turpitude and financial disasters they brew for us proles, they have proven they are capable of sweeping it aside and moving on.

God, how I hate them.


Posted by Edward Lud at April 29, 2005 01:52 PM

When I first saw that hoarding, I thought of Christine Keeler & Mandy Rice-Davies...

"... well they would say that, wouldn't they!"


Posted by Ian grey at April 29, 2005 04:41 PM

The brilliance of this is that when the Tories lose, their parliamentary party will concluded that their radical tax-cutting agenda put the voters off.


Posted by Leftthinker at April 29, 2005 11:35 PM

Leftthinker?

Isn't that an oxymoron?


Posted by GCooper at April 29, 2005 11:45 PM

I saw this hoarding on the Unison headquarters building, near Euston Station, last week, and had an almost irresistible urge to climb up with a couple of spray cans and replace the word less with more.

Alas, my innate sense of property rights prevented me. Dammit. Sometimes I wish I was a Leftist anarchist, rather than a Rightist one.

The Left always seem to have more fun! :-)


Posted by Jack Maturin at April 30, 2005 10:45 AM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?


Enter anti-spambot Turing code:





Select some text and click this to format it as a quote Make the selected text bold Make the selected text italic Add a web link


Basic html active.

Alas, but for obscure reasons Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not harness to power of the push-button formatting options and shall therefore compose basic html with their bare hands. Yet Mozilla, Mac and Linux users shall not fear, for we shall reveal forthwith the mysteries of Basic Html:

<strong>This text in-between is bold</strong>

<em>This text is in italics</em>

And
<blockquote>This is a quote</blockquote>
Remember to close your opened tags as such: <tag> tagged text and closing </tag> and we promise you will get out of here alive.

For adding links, either use the link URL button on the toolbar or enter your code by hand in the following format:
<a href="http://www.your_link.com">your link text or description here</a>

Movable Type's anti-spambot e-mail address protection is enabled.

You are a guest on private property. Have fun but please be civil and succinct. Blogroaches will be persecuted, not to mention IP banned.

Long third party quotes or articles will also be deleted... so just link to articles you think are germane to your comment, don't quote the whole bloody thing.