We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
It’s almost libertarian… Iraqis are not just depending on government to protect their new liberty. According to this report from the Coalition Provisional Authority, they are armed and dangerous… to terrorists:
Elsewhere in Baghdad, individuals inside a white Opel fired small arms at ICDC personnel at the Al-Amil gas station. The Civil Defense Corps soldiers returned fire, and Iraqi customers waiting for fuel also fired at the Opel. The assailants broke contact, and a search of the area met with negative results.
Is it just me or does this paragraph sound like something out of an L Neil Smith novel?
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
In isolation, yes, this incident sounds a bit like something out an L. Neil Smith novel. However, outside this incident, it’s worth noting that coalition forces – especially the Brits – have been on a fairly aggressive victim disarmament binge the last year.
Also note that the line at the gas station is almost certainly due to price controls (5 cents per liter, last I heard) and associated shortages.
Actually it seems the long gas lines are due to profiteering by gasoline retailers.
As for the customers shooting at terrorists I’d like to point out that most terrorists in Iraq seem to be outsiders and that the vast majority of victims seem to be Iraqis. At this point I assume that most Iraqis would tend to shoot them out of self defense.
Which is why I oppose the policy of disarming the populace. Considering how many weapons there are in Iraq, and how available they are, any attempt that disarming the populace is doomed to failure. The Coalition should simply form a new reserve militia and just go ahead and enlist every Iraqi military age male into it. Those enlisted won’t really ever have to serve, unless it’s some sort of major catastrophy, and it’ll allow for both a hard hitting weapons control law and for the legal ownership of firearms by the populace.
Similar to that of Switzerland perhaps.
Which is why I oppose the policy of disarming the populace.
Is someone trying to disarm the Iraqis? I thought all the coalition was doing was picking up things like missiles and bombs that are not suitable for self-defense, but was leaving rifles and pistols alone. That is hardly “disarming.”
(Sorry it took so long for my reply. Trying to get back into the work groove after the holidays)
No the Coalition is actively disarming the public. I think they are offering a very small bounty for weapons that are turned in, based on what the weapon is, but that amount is certainly far less than the weapon is worth on the black market.
Personally it’s a foolish thing to do. There are so many weapons in Iraq from Saddam’s bizzare habit of parking munitions dumps all over the place. Also there’s a very profitable and lively arms smuggling business in the middle east that’s been in operation since firearms had been invented.
Beyond foolish IMHO.