Perry, good grief.

"He introduced a controversial tax cut, targeted at the better-off and costing at least $1,000 billion (independent economists suggested as much as $2,500 billion) over 10 years. This was an immediate change. The surpluses built up by a Democrat president were to be used for tax cuts by a Republican."

Since that catastrophic tax cut, the economy has started to rebound, and tax revenues are increasing (despite the "cost" of the initial cut).

The economic surpluses were not anything to do with Clinton -- in fact, by going after Microsoft, the Clinton Administration could arguably have set the scene for the inevitable dotcom meltdown.

And you'll forgive me if I regard with distaste anyone who thinks Paul Krugman is a "noted economist".

Krugman is a noted liar and self-serving liberal weasel, and a disgrace to economists everywhere.

An economic policy which favors low taxes is not "scorched earth"; it's a fundamental tenet of conservative government, and moreover, a policy which has a resounding record of success vis-a-vis its opposite, as espoused by failed neo-socialist governments everywhere.

I said he was welcome, I didn't say I agreed with him.

I am most impressed with the quality of David's work, if not in total agreement. Let us hope that David does not suffer the same problems with the Sunday Times that Daniel Weintraub did with the Sacramento Bee.

Beautiful design work, btw, Perry. I trust we'll be seeing more of that from The Big Blog Company in the future.

Heh. ECONOMICSUK looks a bit like Economic Suck. Hehe. Uh, yeah.

Perry
I strongly agree with Kim. I sent this economic(?) writer a long response. Quoting Krugman, WOW