<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samizdata quote of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/</link>
	<description>A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 19 May 2013 01:04:56 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Runcie Balspune</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-266403</link>
		<dc:creator>Runcie Balspune</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:27:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-266403</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s some pretty hefty stones being thrown around Mr Gilligan&#039;s own crystal palace of journalism there, I wonder what the percentage of newspaper proprietors/editors in trouble is nowadays?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s some pretty hefty stones being thrown around Mr Gilligan&#8217;s own crystal palace of journalism there, I wonder what the percentage of newspaper proprietors/editors in trouble is nowadays?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Agoraphobic Plumber</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-266345</link>
		<dc:creator>Agoraphobic Plumber</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-266345</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Unfortunate state of affairs for Britain...especially since there&#039;s no second amendment over there.  Here in the US, the second amendment provides a wonderful litmus test for who&#039;s a scumbag and who&#039;s not among the constabulary.  If a sheriff or police chief (or even police *officers* for that matter) here is against concealed carry, you can damn near bet that they&#039;ve got something nasty going on or something to hide.  They don&#039;t trust the people they&#039;re &quot;protecting&quot;.  Many police professionals here are enthusiastically in favor of citizens packing.  They recognize that when seconds count they&#039;re minutes away, and they actually want their people to be safe and have whatever help they can get as soon as possible, so as long as they can know who&#039;s packing and who&#039;s not, that the right people are packing, etc. they&#039;re fine with it.

Unfortunately, in many countries packing isn&#039;t even an option for ordinary citizens.  Pity there aren&#039;t more like the Swiss....they ALL pack.  What was their gun crime rate again...?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unfortunate state of affairs for Britain&#8230;especially since there&#8217;s no second amendment over there.  Here in the US, the second amendment provides a wonderful litmus test for who&#8217;s a scumbag and who&#8217;s not among the constabulary.  If a sheriff or police chief (or even police *officers* for that matter) here is against concealed carry, you can damn near bet that they&#8217;ve got something nasty going on or something to hide.  They don&#8217;t trust the people they&#8217;re &#8220;protecting&#8221;.  Many police professionals here are enthusiastically in favor of citizens packing.  They recognize that when seconds count they&#8217;re minutes away, and they actually want their people to be safe and have whatever help they can get as soon as possible, so as long as they can know who&#8217;s packing and who&#8217;s not, that the right people are packing, etc. they&#8217;re fine with it.</p>
<p>Unfortunately, in many countries packing isn&#8217;t even an option for ordinary citizens.  Pity there aren&#8217;t more like the Swiss&#8230;.they ALL pack.  What was their gun crime rate again&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sage</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-266336</link>
		<dc:creator>Sage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:36:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-266336</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;To be fair to the police, one of the basic problems as I see it is that they are asked to enforce laws that are unenforcable, political, or are not supported by the public. &lt;/blockquote&gt;

I&#039;d be far more sympathetic to this point if the police were not every eagerly and aggressively leftist, politically correct, and in all other ways a part of the problem.  They simply are not a bunch of heroic stiffs reluctantly enforcing the political class&#039; will, against their better judgment, and with tortured conscience. 

Nobody is actually forcing the police to harass people for openly political reasons--they exercise tremendous discretion over whom they choose to bring up on charges, and whom they seek to haul in for violating &quot;diversity&quot; dogma, and what have you.  They aren&#039;t innocent, period, precisely because they are a creature of the Labor party, who protects their privileges in return for kickbacks in the form of &quot;donations.&quot;  Enforcement of unpopular laws isn&#039;t their problem, in the main.  It&#039;s refusal to enforce the popular ones.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>To be fair to the police, one of the basic problems as I see it is that they are asked to enforce laws that are unenforcable, political, or are not supported by the public. </p></blockquote>
<p>I&#8217;d be far more sympathetic to this point if the police were not every eagerly and aggressively leftist, politically correct, and in all other ways a part of the problem.  They simply are not a bunch of heroic stiffs reluctantly enforcing the political class&#8217; will, against their better judgment, and with tortured conscience. </p>
<p>Nobody is actually forcing the police to harass people for openly political reasons&#8211;they exercise tremendous discretion over whom they choose to bring up on charges, and whom they seek to haul in for violating &#8220;diversity&#8221; dogma, and what have you.  They aren&#8217;t innocent, period, precisely because they are a creature of the Labor party, who protects their privileges in return for kickbacks in the form of &#8220;donations.&#8221;  Enforcement of unpopular laws isn&#8217;t their problem, in the main.  It&#8217;s refusal to enforce the popular ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: FrancisChalk</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-266334</link>
		<dc:creator>FrancisChalk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:17:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-266334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a dictatorship the ruling class and their enforces are &quot;above the law.&quot; Even though many of the police chiefs are being investigated, the permanent and expanding socialism that is consuming all liberty and democracy in the UK will eventually make that country little different than the former USSR.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a dictatorship the ruling class and their enforces are &#8220;above the law.&#8221; Even though many of the police chiefs are being investigated, the permanent and expanding socialism that is consuming all liberty and democracy in the UK will eventually make that country little different than the former USSR.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: willis</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-266332</link>
		<dc:creator>willis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 24 Dec 2012 14:06:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-266332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Vinegar Joe. Part of the problem is that the job is unattractive to qualified candidates. If the mission was attractive and had a reasonable chance of success then it would be a decent job attracting decent candidates.&quot;

PeterT, keep on deluding yourself.  Keep on enlarging government, expanding its mission, pouring ever more money into it, searching for the holy grail of competent, honest, public servants.  What you are getting now is only a sample of what is rapidly evolving into a totalling controlling government subjagating you to its ever expanding power.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Vinegar Joe. Part of the problem is that the job is unattractive to qualified candidates. If the mission was attractive and had a reasonable chance of success then it would be a decent job attracting decent candidates.&#8221;</p>
<p>PeterT, keep on deluding yourself.  Keep on enlarging government, expanding its mission, pouring ever more money into it, searching for the holy grail of competent, honest, public servants.  What you are getting now is only a sample of what is rapidly evolving into a totalling controlling government subjagating you to its ever expanding power.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-266105</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:58:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-266105</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Stephen Wilmer.

The increasing pressure on defendents to &quot;make a deal&quot; (confess to get a lesser punishement) is already incredibly corrupting (people who are INNOCENT are being pushed about).

As are other changes in the way the law works - for example in fraud trials.

The process (including the judges) appears to be less and less about getting to the truth - and more and more about ticking boxes.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephen Wilmer.</p>
<p>The increasing pressure on defendents to &#8220;make a deal&#8221; (confess to get a lesser punishement) is already incredibly corrupting (people who are INNOCENT are being pushed about).</p>
<p>As are other changes in the way the law works &#8211; for example in fraud trials.</p>
<p>The process (including the judges) appears to be less and less about getting to the truth &#8211; and more and more about ticking boxes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterT</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-266103</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 22:52:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-266103</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Vinegar Joe. Part of the problem is that the job is unattractive to qualified candidates. If the mission was attractive and had a reasonable chance of success then it would be a decent job attracting decent candidates. If a policeman had come to the same conclusions we have on this thread then we should consider him a keeper.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Vinegar Joe. Part of the problem is that the job is unattractive to qualified candidates. If the mission was attractive and had a reasonable chance of success then it would be a decent job attracting decent candidates. If a policeman had come to the same conclusions we have on this thread then we should consider him a keeper.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephen Willmer</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-266050</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephen Willmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 20:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-266050</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[My prediction: on current trends, give it 20 years and we&#039;ll see the same thing with circuit judges. Already far too many of them quite contentedly act as arms of the executive, imagining that they are somehow expediting due process. We need only wait for that toxic mix of grade inflation, discontent, power-craziness and a belief in both indispensability and untouchability before we see a similar dissolution in the bench.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My prediction: on current trends, give it 20 years and we&#8217;ll see the same thing with circuit judges. Already far too many of them quite contentedly act as arms of the executive, imagining that they are somehow expediting due process. We need only wait for that toxic mix of grade inflation, discontent, power-craziness and a belief in both indispensability and untouchability before we see a similar dissolution in the bench.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vinegar Joe</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-265916</link>
		<dc:creator>Vinegar Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 13:32:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-265916</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;one of the basic problems as I see it is that they are asked to enforce laws that are unenforcable, political, or are not supported by the public.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

If they feel their job is so difficult, they can always change occupations. No one is holding a pistol to their heads and forcing them to be police.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>one of the basic problems as I see it is that they are asked to enforce laws that are unenforcable, political, or are not supported by the public.</p></blockquote>
<p>If they feel their job is so difficult, they can always change occupations. No one is holding a pistol to their heads and forcing them to be police.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alisa</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-265878</link>
		<dc:creator>Alisa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 11:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-265878</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;one of the basic problems as I see it is that they are asked to enforce laws that are unenforcable, political, or are not supported by the public.&lt;/blockquote&gt; That may well be the single most basic problem. And not just in the UK.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>one of the basic problems as I see it is that they are asked to enforce laws that are unenforcable, political, or are not supported by the public.</p></blockquote>
<p> That may well be the single most basic problem. And not just in the UK.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jennings (London)</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-265865</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jennings (London)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:54:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-265865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Roue le Jour: It was that, certainly. The question is whether there was also a desire to bring a Tory down given the opportunity. The police are reputedly unhappy with Tory plans with respect to their working conditions. Certainly the &quot;pleb&quot; remarks do sound like a caricature of what the police might think an arrogant Tory might say.

PeterT: Police spend a lot of their time dealing with things like domestic violence, too, and this must be absolutely ghastly a lot of the time.  It&#039;s undoubtedly a very hard job. But that doesn&#039;t change the fact that given that they are given powers to use violence that the rest of us do not have, it remains necessary that they be held to higher standards of integrity than other citizens - not lower. This requires accountability, and this seems to have been lost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Roue le Jour: It was that, certainly. The question is whether there was also a desire to bring a Tory down given the opportunity. The police are reputedly unhappy with Tory plans with respect to their working conditions. Certainly the &#8220;pleb&#8221; remarks do sound like a caricature of what the police might think an arrogant Tory might say.</p>
<p>PeterT: Police spend a lot of their time dealing with things like domestic violence, too, and this must be absolutely ghastly a lot of the time.  It&#8217;s undoubtedly a very hard job. But that doesn&#8217;t change the fact that given that they are given powers to use violence that the rest of us do not have, it remains necessary that they be held to higher standards of integrity than other citizens &#8211; not lower. This requires accountability, and this seems to have been lost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PeterT</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/12/15632/#comment-265841</link>
		<dc:creator>PeterT</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Dec 2012 10:12:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.samizdata.net/?p=15632#comment-265841</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[To be fair to the police, one of the basic problems as I see it is that they are asked to enforce laws that are unenforcable, political, or are not supported by the public. Drug and prostitution laws are the most obvious example of the first category. If the police were allowed to go back to their basic responsibilities of keeping violent crime off the streets then I think they would do their jobs better, have more respect, and enjoy their jobs more.

On the other point, one of the best preservers of liberty would be a constitutional bar on those employed or receiving income from in any way (inc pensioners and private contractors) the government from voting.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To be fair to the police, one of the basic problems as I see it is that they are asked to enforce laws that are unenforcable, political, or are not supported by the public. Drug and prostitution laws are the most obvious example of the first category. If the police were allowed to go back to their basic responsibilities of keeping violent crime off the streets then I think they would do their jobs better, have more respect, and enjoy their jobs more.</p>
<p>On the other point, one of the best preservers of liberty would be a constitutional bar on those employed or receiving income from in any way (inc pensioners and private contractors) the government from voting.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
