<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Another reason for opposing all government aid to other governments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samizdata.net/2012/02/another-reason-4/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/02/another-reason-4/</link>
	<description>A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 22:46:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Marks</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/02/another-reason-4/#comment-231006</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Marks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Mar 2012 22:48:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=14768#comment-231006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[British government (read &quot;taxpayers&quot;) aid to India is about teaching Indians to access government services.

No I am not making that up - the British government is spending money teaching Indians to demand X, Y, Z, from the Indian government (a death dance of statism).

But the aid to Argentinia is beyond all comprehention and (even) satire.

We  do not seem to have an elected government in the United Kingdom - we have group of politicians who slavishly follow Civil Service (and other establishment) advice - partly because they are hollow men, but also because it matches the demented rubbish they (the politicians) were taught when they were at university,

Methinks that Peter Bauer works (such as &quot;Dissent On Devlopment&quot;) were not on their &quot;reading lists&quot;, and citeing such works (in  a positive way) would not have been good for getting a &quot;First&quot;.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>British government (read &#8220;taxpayers&#8221;) aid to India is about teaching Indians to access government services.</p>
<p>No I am not making that up &#8211; the British government is spending money teaching Indians to demand X, Y, Z, from the Indian government (a death dance of statism).</p>
<p>But the aid to Argentinia is beyond all comprehention and (even) satire.</p>
<p>We  do not seem to have an elected government in the United Kingdom &#8211; we have group of politicians who slavishly follow Civil Service (and other establishment) advice &#8211; partly because they are hollow men, but also because it matches the demented rubbish they (the politicians) were taught when they were at university,</p>
<p>Methinks that Peter Bauer works (such as &#8220;Dissent On Devlopment&#8221;) were not on their &#8220;reading lists&#8221;, and citeing such works (in  a positive way) would not have been good for getting a &#8220;First&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/02/another-reason-4/#comment-231005</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2012 06:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=14768#comment-231005</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Argentina&#039;s governments are always utterly incompetent. (That is the good ones. The bad ones are other, far worse things at well). Every now and then the shit hits the fan, and Argentina goes on a sabre rattling spree, amongst other things. We are at that stage in the cycle, unfortunately. However, Argentina is not going to actually do any more than that over the Falklands this time. (Also, although most Argentines do think that they should control the Falklands, taking them by force is an action of unspeakable, disgusting right wing juntas. That makes subsequent governments reluctant to follow). ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Argentina&#8217;s governments are always utterly incompetent. (That is the good ones. The bad ones are other, far worse things at well). Every now and then the shit hits the fan, and Argentina goes on a sabre rattling spree, amongst other things. We are at that stage in the cycle, unfortunately. However, Argentina is not going to actually do any more than that over the Falklands this time. (Also, although most Argentines do think that they should control the Falklands, taking them by force is an action of unspeakable, disgusting right wing juntas. That makes subsequent governments reluctant to follow). </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mendicant</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/02/another-reason-4/#comment-231004</link>
		<dc:creator>Mendicant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Mar 2012 01:29:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=14768#comment-231004</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The obvious purpose of Foreign Aid is bribery, to &quot;encourage&quot; investment by foreign governments in British companies.

Jesus Christ, what is Nancy Soderberg whittering on about?

&lt;em&gt;Its default on &#163;51 billion of debt in 2001 turned it into a financial pariah, a status that was not enhanced by two subsequent unilateral debt restructurings.&lt;/em&gt;

Argentina was right to default. Financial Pariah? Argentina&#039;s economy is growing. &quot;Unilateral&quot;, oh, how naughty, a sovereign state making its own decisions! Default works. Besides, governments are supposed to protect their people, not foreign bankers.

&lt;em&gt;It has demanded a Paris Club restructuring without the mandatory IMF monitoring, &lt;/em&gt;

Given that the IMF clowns plunged 50% of their population into poverty, the Argentines would be mad to want the IMF anywhere near their country. That would be like Anne Frank inviting Hitler to tea.

&lt;em&gt;Argentina has refused to play by the rules&lt;/em&gt;

No country plays by the rules, oh Nancy thou art naive.

&lt;em&gt;and it has insisted, in blatant disregard of its treaty obligations under ICSID, that arbitral awards be brought to Argentina for &#8220;approval&#8221; by its own courts.&quot;&lt;/em&gt;

Nancy, its called &quot;sovereignty&quot; and &quot;protecting your own national interests&quot;, look it up. Poor Nancy seems to think democracy should be abolished in favour of &quot;international bodies&quot; like the IMF, EU, etc, headed by panjandrums like Christine Self-Regarde.

As for the right-wing Junta, Kirchner (to her credit) has locked them all up. Videla, Galtieri and co completed their journey from being Kissinger&#039;s trained bitch boys to being prison bitches (though at least with the latter there is some dignity).

I don&#039;t like alot of things about the Kirchner regime, but, her locking up of the Junta and her rejection of the wretched and worthless IMF are two things that count in her favour, (if all leaders told the IMF to go away and die we would all be better off) and the fact she doesn&#039;t buy into Nancy Soderberg&#039;s globalist crap is another bonus.

The Falklands aren&#039;t worth getting into a tizz over. Honestly its all too boring for anyone to get into trade disputes about.

BTW The Falklanders should be thankful they are not Chagossians.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The obvious purpose of Foreign Aid is bribery, to &#8220;encourage&#8221; investment by foreign governments in British companies.</p>
<p>Jesus Christ, what is Nancy Soderberg whittering on about?</p>
<p><em>Its default on &pound;51 billion of debt in 2001 turned it into a financial pariah, a status that was not enhanced by two subsequent unilateral debt restructurings.</em></p>
<p>Argentina was right to default. Financial Pariah? Argentina&#8217;s economy is growing. &#8220;Unilateral&#8221;, oh, how naughty, a sovereign state making its own decisions! Default works. Besides, governments are supposed to protect their people, not foreign bankers.</p>
<p><em>It has demanded a Paris Club restructuring without the mandatory IMF monitoring, </em></p>
<p>Given that the IMF clowns plunged 50% of their population into poverty, the Argentines would be mad to want the IMF anywhere near their country. That would be like Anne Frank inviting Hitler to tea.</p>
<p><em>Argentina has refused to play by the rules</em></p>
<p>No country plays by the rules, oh Nancy thou art naive.</p>
<p><em>and it has insisted, in blatant disregard of its treaty obligations under ICSID, that arbitral awards be brought to Argentina for &ldquo;approval&rdquo; by its own courts.&#8221;</em></p>
<p>Nancy, its called &#8220;sovereignty&#8221; and &#8220;protecting your own national interests&#8221;, look it up. Poor Nancy seems to think democracy should be abolished in favour of &#8220;international bodies&#8221; like the IMF, EU, etc, headed by panjandrums like Christine Self-Regarde.</p>
<p>As for the right-wing Junta, Kirchner (to her credit) has locked them all up. Videla, Galtieri and co completed their journey from being Kissinger&#8217;s trained bitch boys to being prison bitches (though at least with the latter there is some dignity).</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t like alot of things about the Kirchner regime, but, her locking up of the Junta and her rejection of the wretched and worthless IMF are two things that count in her favour, (if all leaders told the IMF to go away and die we would all be better off) and the fact she doesn&#8217;t buy into Nancy Soderberg&#8217;s globalist crap is another bonus.</p>
<p>The Falklands aren&#8217;t worth getting into a tizz over. Honestly its all too boring for anyone to get into trade disputes about.</p>
<p>BTW The Falklanders should be thankful they are not Chagossians.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laird</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2012/02/another-reason-4/#comment-231003</link>
		<dc:creator>Laird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Feb 2012 14:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=14768#comment-231003</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s pretty extraordinary that Britain (or any other sane nation, but &lt;em&gt;especially&lt;/em&gt; Britain) is still subsidizing Argentina. Douglas Casey defined foreign aid as &quot;a transfer from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.&#8221; Sounds about right. The idiocy of bureaucrats never ceases to amaze.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s pretty extraordinary that Britain (or any other sane nation, but <em>especially</em> Britain) is still subsidizing Argentina. Douglas Casey defined foreign aid as &#8220;a transfer from poor people in rich countries to rich people in poor countries.&rdquo; Sounds about right. The idiocy of bureaucrats never ceases to amaze.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
