“WW2 Bomber Found on Moon has DISAPPEARED”

These CRU people are so deep in the mud of mendacity that nothing they say can now to trusted, about anything. They now say when they lost their original data, picking the least disreputable moment they can. But we shouldn’t take their word for that either.

Let me see if I can find a link. Yes, found it! Here.

The other thing that may not be recoverable is which stations were used and what corrections were applied to the stations. From my reading of the CRUtapes so far it appears that most of poor Harry’s job was to recreate V2 of the HadCru temperature series, then update it to V3. It didn’t go well.

Surely, it can’t be true that the CRU had the only copy of the source data, and erased it.

It’s pretty jaw-dropping, and I am only about 1/10 of the way down the page myself.

Global Warming Fraud and the Future of Science
By J.R. Dunn
The East Anglia Climate Research Unit (CRU) revelations come as no real surprise to anyone who has closely followed the global-warming saga. The Anthropogenic Global Warming (AGW) thesis, to give it its semi-official name, is no stranger to fraud. It is no real exaggeration to state that it was fertilized with fraud, marinated in fraud, stewed in fraud, and at last served up to the world as prime, grade-A fraud with nice side orders of fakery and disingenuousness. Damning as they may be, the CRU e-mails are merely the climactic element in an exhaustively long line.

A short tour of previous AGW highlights includes:

(Link)

I couldn’t see anything wrong with the name “Manuel” to be honest…

Dunno – it seemed to irk Kim du Toit, so I used my real name. Sort of.

There’s an interesting bit by Brian Appleyard in the magazine who seems pretty convinced, even by James Lovelock. That’s fair enough – there are plenty of reasons to be alarmed. But as Lomborg says, being alarmed is not a reason to invest in mitigations which we know to be useless and cost more than, say, ridding the world of malaria, and he doesn’t have a good counter to that.

Still, good to see the matter being debated and to see the warm-mongerers lose a bit of their pious certainty. I’d be happy to believe it all if I ever saw a rational counter to objections, but I never have – all I’ve seen is name-calling and this “pay no attention to the man behind the curtain” high-handedness.

Anyway. We don’t know enough about climate. So all that we have are conjectures and hypothesis.
I try to induce people to research how climate data is collected, its sources, from how much of Land and Sea Atmosphere it came from. It is easy to see we today can’t measure Earth Temperature reliably to the 2º-3ºC. It is impossible, there are large chunks of the Planet we don’t have data to begin with.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9sZx90EH8N8&feature=player_embedded

Is there some possibility climategate could expand into reportergate?

The living went on to learn, in other ways, other things.

RRS