We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.
Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]
|
BBC contractor fired in TV Licensing scandal A victory has been achieved in the fight against the disgracefully threatening letters sent by the BBC’s TV Licensing arm. The company responsible for sending the letters, Proximity London, was fired by the BBC on Friday after it was found that millions of letters had contained false statistics.
|
Who Are We? The Samizdata people are a bunch of sinister and heavily armed globalist illuminati who seek to infect the entire world with the values of personal liberty and several property. Amongst our many crimes is a sense of humour and the intermittent use of British spelling.
We are also a varied group made up of social individualists, classical liberals, whigs, libertarians, extropians, futurists, ‘Porcupines’, Karl Popper fetishists, recovering neo-conservatives, crazed Ayn Rand worshipers, over-caffeinated Virginia Postrel devotees, witty Frédéric Bastiat wannabes, cypherpunks, minarchists, kritarchists and wild-eyed anarcho-capitalists from Britain, North America, Australia and Europe.
|
This whole campaign against the licence fee and its enforcement is going to backfire. They’ll end up replacing it with something worse and impossible to avoid- my guess is an ISP tax.
The only campaign worth fighting is against the existence of the BBC itself.
I would have to agree with that.
Check out http://www.itsmummy.com/
Ian B makes a very valid and spot on point.
On a related matter, I saw an atrociously Stalinist advert on TV today threatening “benefit cheats”. One of those gruff Eastenders-type voices growled that it’s no use, We Have Ways of seeing what you’re up to that you can’t even imagine. Nice.
m II p
They are shocking. The “no ifs no buts” ones are unbelievable because they come close to saying you have no come-back, no way of defending yourself. And what if you are innocent and it’s “no ifs no buts”. I
If you’re not au fait with the UK you’d be bloody staggered by them.
hey even i agree with Ian…