<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Samizdata quote of the day</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/</link>
	<description>A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 09:09:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nate</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174861</link>
		<dc:creator>Nate</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:24:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174861</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[M:

You&#039;re knocking Palin&#039;s experience as governor of an irrelevant state of only 600,000?

I&#039;m not trying to pick a fight or anything -- just curious -- are you from the US?

I couldn&#039;t imagine being governor of any state to be a simple task no matter how few people; however I would reckon that governing Alaska would have many unique challenges wrt the lower 48.  

As far as experience that translates well for POTUS and VPOTUS credentials, I would place governing Alaska much higher than say, governing Connecticut (~5x Alaska population), Missouri (~9x Alaska population), etc.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>M:</p>
<p>You&#8217;re knocking Palin&#8217;s experience as governor of an irrelevant state of only 600,000?</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not trying to pick a fight or anything &#8212; just curious &#8212; are you from the US?</p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t imagine being governor of any state to be a simple task no matter how few people; however I would reckon that governing Alaska would have many unique challenges wrt the lower 48.  </p>
<p>As far as experience that translates well for POTUS and VPOTUS credentials, I would place governing Alaska much higher than say, governing Connecticut (~5x Alaska population), Missouri (~9x Alaska population), etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Billy Beck</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174860</link>
		<dc:creator>Billy Beck</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 16:06:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174860</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;&quot;Daddy didn&#039;t pass any of his check rides for him.&quot;&lt;/i&gt;

That&#039;s exactly right, WR, but right there, you&#039;re already in it way, way above the understanding of most people who take this tack on him.  They have no earthly idea what you&#039;re talking about or what it means.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>&#8220;Daddy didn&#8217;t pass any of his check rides for him.&#8221;</i></p>
<p>That&#8217;s exactly right, WR, but right there, you&#8217;re already in it way, way above the understanding of most people who take this tack on him.  They have no earthly idea what you&#8217;re talking about or what it means.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cb</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174859</link>
		<dc:creator>cb</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 08:32:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174859</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Palin has been governor of an irrelevant state for 2 years&quot;

Palin was mayor for a decade (town of about 9000), Lt Gov for four years, and Gov for two.

She also is a pilot and ran a fishing business.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Palin has been governor of an irrelevant state for 2 years&#8221;</p>
<p>Palin was mayor for a decade (town of about 9000), Lt Gov for four years, and Gov for two.</p>
<p>She also is a pilot and ran a fishing business.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: a.sommer</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174858</link>
		<dc:creator>a.sommer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Aug 2008 08:30:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174858</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;i&gt;I&#039;m pretty certain Bush didn&#039;t see any of those situations. And even if he did, what&#039;s the point? He&#039;s still one of the worst Presidents to ever wear the title of President of the United States of America [...blah blah blah...]&lt;/i&gt;

Are you old enough to remember some guys by the name of Johnson, Nixon, or Carter? 

We&#039;ve had far worse than Bush. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I&#8217;m pretty certain Bush didn&#8217;t see any of those situations. And even if he did, what&#8217;s the point? He&#8217;s still one of the worst Presidents to ever wear the title of President of the United States of America [...blah blah blah...]</i></p>
<p>Are you old enough to remember some guys by the name of Johnson, Nixon, or Carter? </p>
<p>We&#8217;ve had far worse than Bush. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laird</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174857</link>
		<dc:creator>Laird</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 20:26:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174857</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A little OT, but does anyone remember when Texas tried to join OPEC? Maybe Alaska should try it. Might get them a little more clout in dealing with Washington!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A little OT, but does anyone remember when Texas tried to join OPEC? Maybe Alaska should try it. Might get them a little more clout in dealing with Washington!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174856</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot; Hardly Texas, New York, or Illinois is it?&quot;

You forgot to mention-Dark 8 mo&#039;s- cold 10 mo&#039;s, mosquitos the size of light airplanes, blackflys the size of small birds and did I mention it&#039;s cold and dark most of the year?
So is Siberia, doubt that Siberia(I haven&#039;t checked the stat&#039;s so that&#039;s a &#039;guesstiment&#039;) has 600k year round residents, but hey, in todays &quot;energy world/resource game&quot; it&#039;s , in the term of the &quot;street&quot; &quot;ah playa&#039; on the world stage. 
Alaska is rich beyond measure, but it&#039;s 90% ?(guestiment again)locked down under US Fed. regulations.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8221; Hardly Texas, New York, or Illinois is it?&#8221;</p>
<p>You forgot to mention-Dark 8 mo&#8217;s- cold 10 mo&#8217;s, mosquitos the size of light airplanes, blackflys the size of small birds and did I mention it&#8217;s cold and dark most of the year?<br />
So is Siberia, doubt that Siberia(I haven&#8217;t checked the stat&#8217;s so that&#8217;s a &#8216;guesstiment&#8217;) has 600k year round residents, but hey, in todays &#8220;energy world/resource game&#8221; it&#8217;s , in the term of the &#8220;street&#8221; &#8220;ah playa&#8217; on the world stage.<br />
Alaska is rich beyond measure, but it&#8217;s 90% ?(guestiment again)locked down under US Fed. regulations.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174855</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 19:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174855</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It has a population of 600,000. Hardly Texas, New York, or Illinois is it?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It has a population of 600,000. Hardly Texas, New York, or Illinois is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174854</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 18:40:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174854</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;Palin has been governor of an irrelevant state for 2 years&quot;

Given that Alaska is an &quot;oil kingdom&quot; in it&#039;s own right, I hardly find it  &quot;irrelevant &quot;.
&quot;Drill here, drill now&quot; anyone?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Palin has been governor of an irrelevant state for 2 years&#8221;</p>
<p>Given that Alaska is an &#8220;oil kingdom&#8221; in it&#8217;s own right, I hardly find it  &#8220;irrelevant &#8220;.<br />
&#8220;Drill here, drill now&#8221; anyone?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174853</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 10:01:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174853</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Margaret Thatcher had been an MP for years and a government minister before becoming Tory leader, and she was Tory leader for 4 years before becoming PM. Palin has been governor of an irrelevant state for 2 years and mayor of a tiny town for six. ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Margaret Thatcher had been an MP for years and a government minister before becoming Tory leader, and she was Tory leader for 4 years before becoming PM. Palin has been governor of an irrelevant state for 2 years and mayor of a tiny town for six. </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alasdair</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174852</link>
		<dc:creator>Alasdair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 01:14:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174852</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Wind Rider - if I hadn&#039;t seen the generally minuscule calibre of M&#039;s comments, I&#039;d be wondering if you had paid him to provide an example of what you mean ...
 
In M&#039;s defence, it should probably be pointed out that M doesn&#039;t actually know any better, most likely ... M probably believes that Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister because of &quot;identity politics&quot; ... after all, anything else just isn&#039;t possible, now, is it ?
 
For M, &quot;critical thinking&quot; seems to mean &#039;actively expressing criticisms&#039; ... poor dear - the echo-chamber tolls again ... ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wind Rider &#8211; if I hadn&#8217;t seen the generally minuscule calibre of M&#8217;s comments, I&#8217;d be wondering if you had paid him to provide an example of what you mean &#8230;</p>
<p>In M&#8217;s defence, it should probably be pointed out that M doesn&#8217;t actually know any better, most likely &#8230; M probably believes that Margaret Thatcher became Prime Minister because of &#8220;identity politics&#8221; &#8230; after all, anything else just isn&#8217;t possible, now, is it ?</p>
<p>For M, &#8220;critical thinking&#8221; seems to mean &#8216;actively expressing criticisms&#8217; &#8230; poor dear &#8211; the echo-chamber tolls again &#8230; </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: M</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174851</link>
		<dc:creator>M</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 00:00:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&lt;blockquote&gt;he&#039;ll be regarded as one of the all time greats&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Are you smoking crack? ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>he&#8217;ll be regarded as one of the all time greats</p></blockquote>
<p>Are you smoking crack? </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wind Rider</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2008/08/samizdata-quote-392/#comment-174850</link>
		<dc:creator>Wind Rider</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Aug 2008 23:52:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=11825#comment-174850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like BB, I&#039;ve always chuckled at the folks that constantly called Bush a moron, usually immediately after describing a conspiracy theory involving diabolical genius. . .his succesful completion of pilot selection, UPT, Fighter follow-in, and some time &#039;flying the line&#039; without inadvertant planetary contact is a big reason why. Cause while he may have had (and I don&#039;t really buy it) daddy help him get in the door, well, once inside, he was pretty much on his own. Daddy didn&#039;t pass any of his check rides for him.

I do have to depart from what appears so far to be a collection of generally backhanded defenses of Bush&#039;s intellect, all the while allowing for his performance in office. I actually voted for the man twice, and am fairly satisfied with the majority of the job he&#039;s done. There are some aspects that he could have handled better, mostly on domestic issues, and the White House message operation for the last 7 years has been absolutely nothing short of totally buffoonish at times - still -

Based on results, the actions this man initiated, once spurred to action by 9/11 have been radically historical, of a sort that will long be noted. He&#039;s led a coalition (yes, despite the cries of unilateral action) that has brought a semblence of Western Style Liberal Democracy to over 35 million people, directly, who were previously living in fear under either a Stalinist or Medieval Theocratic regime. Counting simply the women that gained the right to vote - that&#039;s one hell of a voter registration drive. His quiet (as in - not glamorized and sensationalized by the media) work to fight AIDS and improve lives also helped and touched millions in Africa - far more than the plans and programs of those before him ever did. And despite the liberal proclivity to mention the words &#039;Plame&#039; and &#039;Scooter&#039; together, then begin writhing in orgasmic glee, and the continuing crack pot calls for impeachment proceedings (which, in the end, really, really sound like &#039;they did it to our guy&#039; payback) - for all of that - where are all the indictments, subpeonas, grand juries, and the entire three ring DC circus that surrounds scandal and corruption? With anecdotal memories going back to the days of Carter, I can&#039;t really recall a &lt;i&gt;less&lt;/i&gt; scandal plagued administration. It&#039;s certainly been awfully quiet compared to the previous bunch.

I think history will look very respectfully at Bush, and once there&#039;s some distance from the heat of the partisan rancor, he&#039;ll be regarded as one of the all time greats - a man that not many expected much from, who rose to the occasion literally thrust upon him by circumstance.

That evaluation is certainly going to come along, particularly once it&#039;s considered by those who don&#039;t have a huge personal investment despising the man, or a long standing dislike to begin with.




]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like BB, I&#8217;ve always chuckled at the folks that constantly called Bush a moron, usually immediately after describing a conspiracy theory involving diabolical genius. . .his succesful completion of pilot selection, UPT, Fighter follow-in, and some time &#8216;flying the line&#8217; without inadvertant planetary contact is a big reason why. Cause while he may have had (and I don&#8217;t really buy it) daddy help him get in the door, well, once inside, he was pretty much on his own. Daddy didn&#8217;t pass any of his check rides for him.</p>
<p>I do have to depart from what appears so far to be a collection of generally backhanded defenses of Bush&#8217;s intellect, all the while allowing for his performance in office. I actually voted for the man twice, and am fairly satisfied with the majority of the job he&#8217;s done. There are some aspects that he could have handled better, mostly on domestic issues, and the White House message operation for the last 7 years has been absolutely nothing short of totally buffoonish at times &#8211; still -</p>
<p>Based on results, the actions this man initiated, once spurred to action by 9/11 have been radically historical, of a sort that will long be noted. He&#8217;s led a coalition (yes, despite the cries of unilateral action) that has brought a semblence of Western Style Liberal Democracy to over 35 million people, directly, who were previously living in fear under either a Stalinist or Medieval Theocratic regime. Counting simply the women that gained the right to vote &#8211; that&#8217;s one hell of a voter registration drive. His quiet (as in &#8211; not glamorized and sensationalized by the media) work to fight AIDS and improve lives also helped and touched millions in Africa &#8211; far more than the plans and programs of those before him ever did. And despite the liberal proclivity to mention the words &#8216;Plame&#8217; and &#8216;Scooter&#8217; together, then begin writhing in orgasmic glee, and the continuing crack pot calls for impeachment proceedings (which, in the end, really, really sound like &#8216;they did it to our guy&#8217; payback) &#8211; for all of that &#8211; where are all the indictments, subpeonas, grand juries, and the entire three ring DC circus that surrounds scandal and corruption? With anecdotal memories going back to the days of Carter, I can&#8217;t really recall a <i>less</i> scandal plagued administration. It&#8217;s certainly been awfully quiet compared to the previous bunch.</p>
<p>I think history will look very respectfully at Bush, and once there&#8217;s some distance from the heat of the partisan rancor, he&#8217;ll be regarded as one of the all time greats &#8211; a man that not many expected much from, who rose to the occasion literally thrust upon him by circumstance.</p>
<p>That evaluation is certainly going to come along, particularly once it&#8217;s considered by those who don&#8217;t have a huge personal investment despising the man, or a long standing dislike to begin with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
