However, I suppose it would be better than President Hillary Clinton.

Still back to the posting:

The Clinton News Network is part of a much wider thing – something that dominates many institutions in the United States and beyond.

The definition of “diversity”.

In the “old days” (as recently as the 1970′s in Britain) “diversity” in a college politics department (and so on) meant “diversity of opinion” – people with different points of view.

Now “diversity” means things like race, sex, sexuality, disabled (differently abled)……. and so on.

So a college department or a network newsroom can be filled by people who all have the same basic (LEFTIST) set of political opinions and social attitudes and be called “diverse” or “an example of diversity”.

The idea that someone could not hold the basic poltical opinions that both Senator Clinton and Senator Obama share, does not really enter the thoughts of the C.N.N. people (anyone who does not share these basic opinions is a space monster as far as they are concerned). So voting choices have to be on race, sex and so on.

Race or Gender: Black male voters face tough choices in S.C.

(Dear God, please forgive me for that….)

http://chasemeladies.blogspot.com/2005/04/condi-2008-love-poem.html

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/46644

Some of the Onion’s best stuff is based on reality.

Unfortunately, she’d rather run the NFL. If even a tenth of what the lefties say about the Bush Administration are true, Mr. Goodell had best watch out…

Halp! I have no idea what any of that means!!!

—–

Now THAT would be a spectacle to behold.

—-

Indeed.

Unfortunately, she’d rather run the NFL. If even a tenth of what the lefties say about the Bush Administration are true, Mr. Goodell had best watch out…

What about the sexist Latino male? Has anyone stopped to consider his plight?

I’m sorry, but that’s a redundant descriptor there…