We are developing the social individualist meta-context for the future. From the very serious to the extremely frivolous... lets see what is on the mind of the Samizdata people.

Samizdata, derived from Samizdat /n. - a system of clandestine publication of banned literature in the USSR [Russ.,= self-publishing house]

Which starlet is in bigger trouble?

No, I am not talking about the tiresome Lindsay Lohan and her ilk.

Perusing the morning papers, I could not help but wonder who will come under more fire: Kiera Knightley for glamorizing smoking (and looking absolutely stunning while she does so), or Sienna Miller for wearing what appears to be a keffiyeh as a bikini top?

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on FacebookShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare on RedditShare on Google+Share on VK

7 comments to Which starlet is in bigger trouble?

  • Nick M

    Kiera looks stunning as usual and Gawd knows what Ms Miller is up to. I’m not a particular fan of hers but in her defence I would have to say she at least makes the garment more glamourous than Arafat managed. Wasn’t he something of a Che Guevarra type sex-symbol in the 70s? Bloody hell, truly the decade that style forgot!

  • Jacob

    Well, Sienna Miller seems to be sensitive to the problem. She took it off. (see last photo).

  • It shames me to say so but looking at the things in the first photograph, I have to say that I would love to put both in my mouth.

  • Counting Cats

    Not only do I not know who these ladies are, but I still don’t know who Lindsay Lohan is.

  • Keira Knightley is the only one of the bunch mentioned who does not really belong in that category (granted, she is as much a spoiled brat as the rest of them, if we are to believe the media).

  • No surprise – they tend to be wrapped around tits.

  • Kim du Toit

    I’d vote for “Spike” (the character, not the actor) as PM. Could hardly be worse than the last three.