<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Big Brother goes to the Olympics</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samizdata.net/2004/08/big-brother-goes-to-the-olympi/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2004/08/big-brother-goes-to-the-olympi/</link>
	<description>A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Jun 2013 14:54:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Herbert</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2004/08/big-brother-goes-to-the-olympi/#comment-241683</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Aug 2004 19:44:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=6543#comment-241683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not that even half-way compentent terrorists would be conducting conversations &lt;i&gt;en clair&lt;/i&gt; in English, Arabic or Farsi.  Sometimes one feels sorry for would-be terrorists who aren&#039;t good enough at it to trouble the dumb-weight of much so-called security.  Their failure to do so provides a most unfortunate record of &quot;success&quot; for mass surveillance.

This is the circular proof of the merit of Big Brother.  If there&#039;s no terrorism (crime, anti-social behaviour, ...) it&#039;s because of the surveillance, and so we need more surveillance to make sure it will continue to work.  If there is something--anything--undesirable, we need more surveillance in order to suppresss it.   ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not that even half-way compentent terrorists would be conducting conversations <i>en clair</i> in English, Arabic or Farsi.  Sometimes one feels sorry for would-be terrorists who aren&#8217;t good enough at it to trouble the dumb-weight of much so-called security.  Their failure to do so provides a most unfortunate record of &#8220;success&#8221; for mass surveillance.</p>
<p>This is the circular proof of the merit of Big Brother.  If there&#8217;s no terrorism (crime, anti-social behaviour, &#8230;) it&#8217;s because of the surveillance, and so we need more surveillance to make sure it will continue to work.  If there is something&#8211;anything&#8211;undesirable, we need more surveillance in order to suppresss it.   </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
