<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Television is dull&#8230;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samizdata.net/2004/07/television-is-dull/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2004/07/television-is-dull/</link>
	<description>A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 21 May 2013 09:32:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squander Two</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2004/07/television-is-dull/#comment-56053</link>
		<dc:creator>Squander Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 09:57:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=6418#comment-56053</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently, Ritchie came up with the idea as a response to Madonna&#039;s bike being nicked.
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Apparently, Ritchie came up with the idea as a response to Madonna&#8217;s bike being nicked.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guy Herbert</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2004/07/television-is-dull/#comment-56052</link>
		<dc:creator>Guy Herbert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2004 06:43:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=6418#comment-56052</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That&#039;s actually the weakness.  Rather than (as it superficially appears) punishing these scum by playing practical jokes on them, the program actually rewards their behaviour an appearance on TV and an opportunity to self-reinforce in front of the cameras.  (Bear in mind they probably have to sign releases for the material they are involved in to reach the screen.)

That Ritchie was involved, if he was, is not completely surprising.  Swag represents another branch of the disgusting British popular love affair with dim and vicious petty criminals as amusing, loveable cheeky chappies &quot; &#039;oo never did any &#039;arm to ordinary people&quot;, that he has exploited so well.  ]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s actually the weakness.  Rather than (as it superficially appears) punishing these scum by playing practical jokes on them, the program actually rewards their behaviour an appearance on TV and an opportunity to self-reinforce in front of the cameras.  (Bear in mind they probably have to sign releases for the material they are involved in to reach the screen.)</p>
<p>That Ritchie was involved, if he was, is not completely surprising.  Swag represents another branch of the disgusting British popular love affair with dim and vicious petty criminals as amusing, loveable cheeky chappies &#8221; &#8216;oo never did any &#8216;arm to ordinary people&#8221;, that he has exploited so well.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Squander Two</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2004/07/television-is-dull/#comment-56051</link>
		<dc:creator>Squander Two</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jul 2004 13:31:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=6418#comment-56051</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[And the new series of Swag has a new gimmick: they interview the criminals afterwards.  It&#039;s brilliant.  It just doesn&#039;t dawn on them that anything they say might be viewed negatively by viewers.  
]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And the new series of Swag has a new gimmick: they interview the criminals afterwards.  It&#8217;s brilliant.  It just doesn&#8217;t dawn on them that anything they say might be viewed negatively by viewers.  </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
