<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A nasty taste</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.samizdata.net/2003/06/a-nasty-taste/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2003/06/a-nasty-taste/</link>
	<description>A blog for people with a critically rational individualist perspective</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 07:52:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Jennings</title>
		<link>http://www.samizdata.net/2003/06/a-nasty-taste/#comment-241206</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Jennings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Jun 2003 12:44:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://192.168.200.139/?p=3785#comment-241206</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I &lt;a href=&quot;http://michaeljennings.blogspot.com/2003_05_04_michaeljennings_archive.html#93983336&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;wrote&lt;/a&gt; about the precautionary principle a while back. Basically, the idea is silly, and ultimately immoral. (If you could have done something that could have saved a life, and you don&#039;t do it through excessive caution, you are just as culpible if you cause a death through excessive zeal). That said, I spend most of the post actually criticising an opponent of the precautionary principle who in my mind lacks balance the other way.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I <a href="http://michaeljennings.blogspot.com/2003_05_04_michaeljennings_archive.html#93983336" rel="nofollow">wrote</a> about the precautionary principle a while back. Basically, the idea is silly, and ultimately immoral. (If you could have done something that could have saved a life, and you don&#8217;t do it through excessive caution, you are just as culpible if you cause a death through excessive zeal). That said, I spend most of the post actually criticising an opponent of the precautionary principle who in my mind lacks balance the other way.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
